UDC

811.161.1.37+81ʼ373.612.2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V143

Authors

<b><i>Nadezhda A. Iliukhina</i></b><br>
Samara National Research University; Moskovskoe sh. 34, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation;<br>
ОRCID: <a href="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-2725">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-2725</a> e-mail: <a href="mailto:ilnadezhda@rambler.ru">ilnadezhda@rambler.ru</a><br>
<br>
<b><i>Ol’ga V. Chausova</i></b><br>
Samara National Research University; Moskovskoe sh. 34, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation;<br>
ORCID: <a href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-5681">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-5681</a> e-mail: <a href="mailto:olgachausova@yandex.ru">olgachausova@yandex.ru</a><br>

Abstract

This article describes the results of the study on the psychophysiological phenomenon of synaesthesia projected onto language and speech. Synaesthesia is considered on the basis of words with the root myagk- (myagky, myagko, myagkost’, smyagchit’), which in their original meaning name the tactile sensation of softness. The paper aimed to identify the potential of this vocabulary and the sensory impression behind it as a means of conceptualizing knowledge about the world as well as to study the mechanism for the development of metaphorical, primarily synaesthetic, semantics. It is important to assess the sequence of expression of synaesthetic semantics and meanings that go beyond synaesthetic meanings, as well as to study whether vocabulary with the original semantics of softness can figuratively conceptualize knowledge. The research revealed a universal ability of this kind of vocabulary to conceptualize all types of sensory impressions (visual, auditory, olfactory and gustatory) when used metaphorically. In addition to conveying a multimodal perception of the world, these words can express new sensory sensations, unusual for the speaker, for which there are no special names in the language. Along with the synaesthetic semantics itself, vocabulary with the meaning of softness is able to reflect the psychological impressions of comfort, pleasure and enjoyment, as well as the psychological characteristics of a person and the psychological aspect of interpersonal interaction, including speech. The next stage of abstraction of the tactile impression is the development on its basis of quantitative semantics, i.e. the meaning of low intensity of the manifestation of an attribute or an action in their psychological perception. The results obtained can be used to identify the mechanism for conceptualizing sensory impressions and forming synaesthetic metaphors, as well as applied in the practice of lexicographic description of cognitive metaphors.

For citation: Iliukhina N.A., Chausova O.V. Semantic Potential of Tactile Metaphors (Based on Words Naming the Property of Softness). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 64–74. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V143

Keywords

Russian linguistic worldview, sensory vocabulary, cognitive metaphor, sensory metaphor, tactile synaesthesia

References

1. Galeev B.M. Literatura kak “poligon” dlya izucheniya sinestezii [Literature as a “Testing Ground” for Studying Synaesthesia]. Mezhdistsiplinarnye svyazi pri izuchenii literatury [Interdisciplinary Connections in the Study of Literature]. Saratov, 2003, pp. 33–38. Available at: http://synesthesia.prometheus.kai.ru/literat_r.htm (accessed: 30 July 2021).
2. Bardovskaya A.I. Problema sinestezii i integratsionnye tendentsii v yazykovedcheskikh issledovaniyakh [The Problem of Synaesthesia and Integration Trends in Linguistic Research]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2011, no. 1-1, pp. 131–137.
3. Voronin S.V. Osnovy fonosemantiki [Fundamentals of Phonosemantics]. Leningrad, 1982. 244 p.
4. Prokof’eva L.P. Sinesteziya v sovremennoy nauchnoy paradigme [Synaesthesia in a Modern Scientific Paradigm]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser.: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2010, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–10. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sinesteziya-v-sovremennoy-nauchnoy-paradigme/viewer (accessed: 30 July 2021).
5. Kobyakova I.A., Garamyan A.V., Filatova N.I. Semanticheskiy sinkretizm osyazatel’nykh prilagatel’nykh (na materiale russkogo, angliyskogo i ispanskogo yazykov) [Semantic Syncretism of Tactile Adjectives (Based on the Material of Russian, English and Spanish Languages)]. Aktual’nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 135–142. DOI: 10.29025/2079-6021-2020-1-135-142
6. Telegin L.A., Telegina D.A. Sinesteziya prilagatel’nykh s pertseptivnymi priznakami “myagkiy” i “zhestkiy” v russkom, angliyskom i frantsuzskom yazykakh [Synaesthetic Meanings of the Adjectives with Perceptual Features “Soft” and “Hard” in Russian, English and French]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika, 2017, no. 6, pp. 95–105. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2017-6-95-105
7. Gutova N.V. O semanticheskom sinkretizme empiriynykh imen prilagatel’nykh v  khudozhestvennom tekste [On the Semantic Syncretism of Sensory Adjectives in the Literary Text]. Tekst kak edinitsa filologicheskoy interpretatsii [Text as a Unit of Philological Interpretation]. Novosibirsk, 2015, pp. 42–45.
8. Mukina O.G. Fenomen sinestezii kak stileobrazuyushchiy element poeticheskogo teksta [The Phenomenon of Synaesthesia as a Style-Forming Element of a Poetic Text]. Puzyrev A.V. (ed.). Yazyk i myshlenie: Psikhologicheskie i lingvisticheskie aspekty [Language and Thinking: Psychological and Linguistic Aspects]. Moscow, 2018, pp. 134–136. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_35650766_30048348.pdf (accessed: 2 September 2021).
9. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 1980. 242 p.
10. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, 1987. 233 p.
11. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, 1990. 632 p.
12. Iliukhina N.A. Metaforicheskiy obraz v semasiologicheskoy interpretatsii [Metaphorical Image in a Semasiological Interpretation]. Moscow, 2016. 321 p.
13. Iliukhina N.A., Dolgova I.A., Kirillova N.O. Metafora i sistemnost’: semasiologicheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty [Metaphor and Consistency: Semasiological and Cognitive Aspects]. Samara, 2016. 188 p. Available at: http://repo.ssau.ru/handle/Monografii/Metafora-i-sistemnost-semasiologicheskii-i-kognitivnyi-aspekty-monografiya-Tekstelektronnyi-85895?mode=full (accessed: 29 August 2021).
14. Teliya V.N. Metaforizatsiya i ee rol’ v sozdanii yazykovoy kartiny mira [Metaphorization and Its Role in Creating a Linguistic Worldview]. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira [Role of the Human Factor in Language: Language and Worldview]. Moscow, 1988, pp. 173–203. Available at: http://genhis.philol.msu.ru/article_66.shtml (accessed: 30 August 2021).
15. Ullmann S. Semanticheskie universalii [Semantic Universals]. Novoe v lingvistike [News of Linguistics]. Moscow, 1970. Iss. 5, pp. 250–299. Available at: https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/novoe/text.pdf (accessed: 30 August 2021).
16. Medarić M. Vladimir Nabokov i roman XX stoletiya [Vladimir Nabokov and the Russian Novel]. Available at: http://nabokov-lit.ru/nabokov/kritika/medarich-nabokov-i-roman-xx-stoletiya.htm (accessed: 1 September 2021).
17. Kuznetsov S.A. (ed.). Bol’shoy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. St. Petersburg, 1998. Available at: http://www.gramota.ru/slovari/info/bts/ (accessed: 1 September 2021).
18. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N.Yu. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: 80 000 slov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazheniy [Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language: 80,000 Words and Phraseological Units]. Moscow, 1994. 928 p.
19. Semenyuk A.A., Gorodetskaya I.L., Matyushina M.A. (eds.). Leksicheskie trudnosti russkogo yazyka [Lexical Difficulties of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1994. 586 p.