UDC

101.3+165.62

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V067

Authors

Boris V. Podoroga
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences; ul. Goncharnaya 12, str. 1, Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0057-9457 e-mail: boris.podoroga@gmail.com

Abstract

This article discusses the relationship between the concepts of writing and tertiary memory in Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology. It is demonstrated that tertiary memory, being a process of sensuality exteriorization (espacement) that defines the specifics of human existence, is almost identical to Derrida’s writing. Tertiary memory is expressed in everything that falls under the rubric “record”, from the most primitive tools to socio-political institutions and cybernetic technologies. Unlike Derrida, Stiegler believed that tertiary memory is most clearly expressed in material and technical objects. As an example the paper takes Stiegler’s critical analysis of Husserl’s phenomenology and Martin Heidegger’s existential ontology. Stiegler shows that in Husserl’s phenomenology, tertiary memory is represented by tertiary retention (determining a set of symbols, signs and images that implicitly constitute phenomenological experience), while in Heidegger’s philosophy, by the world-historical, determining the objective historical heritage of humankind, without which, as Stiegler demonstrates, there can be no existential experience. Further, the article discusses Stiegler’s thesis about historical and ontological duality of tertiary memory, containing both creative and destructive potential. Referring to Derrida, Stiegler shows that technics should be understood as what Plato called pharmakon, meaning a substance that can be both poison and remedy. This thesis defines the contemporary problem of lacking reflexion of the above-mentioned structural technical duality, which leads to excessive instrumentalization of the technics and its destructive effect on humans, similar to that during the time of Greek sophists.

Keywords

Bernard Stiegler, philosophy of technology, prosthesis, tertiary memory, Jacques Derrida, writing, trace

References

1. Kralechkin D. Razum i glupost’ v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Reason and Stupidity in the Digital Age]. Logos, 2013, no. 3, pp. 178–187.
2. James I. Bernard Stiegler and the Time of Technics. Cult. Politics, 2010, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 207–228.
3. Colebrook C. Impossible, Unprincipled, and Contingent: Bernard Stiegler’s Project of Revolution and Redemption. Boundary 2, 2017, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 213–237.
4. Stiegler B. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, 1998. 298 p.
5. Haworth M. Bernard Stiegler on Transgenerational Memory and the Dual Origin of the Human. Theory Cult. Soc., 2016, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 151–173.
6. Kapp E., Kunov G., Noiré L., Espinas A. Rol’ orudiya v razvitii cheloveka [The Role of Tools in Human Development]. Leningrad, 1925. 172 p.
7. Leroi-Gourhan A. Gesture and Speech. Cambridge, 1993. 432 p.
8. Abbinnett R. The Thought of Bernard Stiegler: Capitalism, Technology and the Politics of Spirit. New York, 2017. 196 p.
9. Derrida J. De la Grammatologie. Paris, 1967. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. Moscow, 2000. 513 p.).
10. Derrida J. L’écriture et la différence. Paris, 1967. 439 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. Pis’mo i razlichie. Moscow, 2007. 496 p.).
11. Avtonomova N.S. Filosofskiy yazyk Zhaka Derrida [The Philosophical Language of Jacques Derrida]. Moscow, 2011. 510 p.
12. Turner B. Ideology and Post-Structuralism After Bernard Stiegler. J. Polit. Ideol., 2017, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 92–110.
13. Husserl E. Sobranie sochineniy T. Ι. Fenomenologiya vnutrennego soznaniya vremeni [Collected Works. Vol. 1. Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time]. Moscow, 1994. 104 p.
14. Howells C., Moore G. (eds.). Stiegler and Technics. Edinburgh, 2013. 312 p.
15. Stiegler B. Symbolic Misery. Cambridge, 2014. 144 p.
16. Derrida J. La voix et le phénomène: Introduction au problème du signe dans la phénoménologie de Husserl. Paris, 1967. 117 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. “Golos i fenomen” i drugie raboty po teorii znaka Gusserlya. St. Petersburg, 2014. 208 p.).
17. Heidegger M. Bytie i vremya [Being and Time]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 452 p.
18. Stiegler B. La technique et le temps, 2: La désorientation. Paris, 1996. 281 p.
19. Heidegger M. The Concept of Time. Oxford, 1992. 40 p.
20. Tinnell J. Grammatization: Bernard Stiegler’s Theory of Writing and Technology. Comput. Compos., 2015, vol. 37, pp. 132–146.
21. Roberts B. Introduction to Bernard Stiegler. Parallax, 2007, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 26–28.
22. Stiegler B. La technique et le temps, 3: Le temps du cinéma et la question du mal- être. Paris, 2001. 329 p.
23. Dvoretskiy I.Kh. Drevnegrechesko-russkiy slovar’ [Ancient Greek-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow, 1958. 1905 p.
24. Derrida J. La dissémination. Paris, 1972. 445 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. Disseminatsiya. Yekaterinburg, 2007. 608 p.).