UDC

[81-139+811.134.2]:070

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V062

Authors

Yuliya A. Gornostaeva
Siberian Federal University; prosp. Svobodnyy 82a, Krasnoyarsk, 660018, Russian Federation; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-4995 e-mail: yulyatald@yandex.ru

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of discourse designing of the negative image of Russia in Spanish mass media using metaphorical models with the target domain “Russia”. Within the framework of this study, a metaphorical model is defined as a mental scheme of connections between different conceptual domains, which is formed and fixed in the minds of native speakers. The material includes Spanish articles from reputable sources (El País and BBC News in Spanish) mentioning Russia (over 500,000 characters in total). With the use of discourse, corpus and lexical-semantic analysis as well as conceptual analysis of metaphorical models, the author found that the negative image of Russia is constructed in Spanish political media discourse through the following metaphorical models: “Russia is the country of Putin”, “Russia is the heir to the USSR” and “Russia is a pseudo-saviour of the world”. The following frames can be distinguished within the structure of the model “Russia is the country of Putin”: 1) Russia belongs to Putin; 2) Putin is a lifelong president; 3) Putinism is an ideology of Russian citizens. The metaphorical model “Russia is the heir to the USSR” includes the following stereotypical scenarios: 1) authoritarian, undemocratic methods of governance; 2) “Soviet” way of living; 3) backward economy. The frame that exists within the model “Russia is a pseudo-saviour of the world” actualizes the scenario of providing humanitarian aid for show. Among the lexical and grammatical representatives of these metaphorical models are the following: prepositional construction with de and the proper name Putin; adjectives with the semes “infinitely long, eternal” and “entire”; adjectives containing semes of distance/separateness; lexeme soviético, etc. The nominative field of the considered image contains both direct nominations, represented by the toponyms Rusia, Moscú and Kremlin, and metaphors that are mainly related to the size of the state. The stereotypical features of the source domain make it possible to create a negative image of Russia as an authoritarian, undemocratic state with an almost monarchical system, outdated Soviet governance methods, saviour-ofthe-world ambitions, and ostentatious behaviour in the international arena.

Keywords

negative image of Russia, metaphorical model, frame, source domain, target domain, toponym, discourse design, political media discourse

References

1. Krestinina E.S. Moskvich kak “vnutrenniy drugoy”: reprezentatsiya obrazov Moskvy i moskvichey v SMI drugikh regionov RF [Muscovite as an “Internal Other”: Representation of Images of Moscow and Muscovites in the Mass Media of Other Regions of Russia]. Dnevnik Altayskoy shkoly politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2008, no. 24, pp. 35–38.
2. Tarasheva E. The Image of a Country Created by International Media: The Case of Bulgaria. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2014. 185 p.
3. Berendeev M.V. Obraz i diskurs: k voprosu o diskursivnom kharaktere formirovaniya politicheskikh obrazov [Image and Discourse. On the Discursive Nature of Political Image Formation]. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 2011, no. 6, pp. 91–99.
4. Semenenko I.S. Obrazy i imidzhi v diskurse natsional’noy identichnosti [Depictions and Images in the Discourse of National Identity]. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 2008, no. 5, pp. 7–18.
5. Nikogosyan N.M. Konstruirovanie obrazov “svoy”, “drugoy” i “chuzhoy” v SMI [Constructing the Images of “Us”, “Them” and “Other” in Mass Media]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 9: Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika, 2010, no. 3, pp. 232–238.
6. Chernobrov D.V. Evolyutsiya “obraza drugogo” v konfliktakh sovremennosti: konstruktivistskiy podkhod [Evolution of the Other in Modern Conflict: A Constructivist Experience of Conflict]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2012, no. 6, pp. 47–53.
7. Posternyak K., Boeva-Omelechko N.B. The Formation of the Image of Russia in the British Political Mass Media Discourse. Acta Scientiarum. Lang. Cult., 2018, vol. 40, no. 2. Art. no. e41086.
8. Milovanova M.V., Svinkina M.Yu. Reprezentatsiya obraza Rossii v mediadiskurse Germanii v kontekste Chempionata mira po futbolu 2018 [Representation of Russia’s Image in German Media Discourse in the Context of the 2018 FIFA World Cup]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Yazykoznanie, 2018, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 148–157. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.3.15
9. Repina E.A., Zheltukhina M.R., Kovaleva N.A., Popova T.G., Garcia Caselles C. International Media Image of Russia: Trends and Patterns of Perception. XLinguae, 2018, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 557–565.
10. Ilyushkina M., Chudinov A. Metaphorical Modeling of Russia’s Image in the Mass Media: The Case of American Press. Yazyk i kul’tura, 2019, no. 45, pp. 20–30. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/45/2
11. Budaev E.V., Chudinov A.P. Metafora v politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Metaphor in Political Communication]. Moscow, 2008. 247 p.
12. Chudinov A.P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Metaphorical Mosaic in Modern Political Communication]. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 248 p.
13. Kalashnikova L.V. Metafora – moshchnyy lingvisticheskiy instrument, preobrazuyushchiy deystvitel’nost’ v mir voobrazhaemyy [Metaphor as Powerful Linguistic Instrument Transforming Reality into Imaginary World]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2011, no. 3, pp. 69–72.
14. Baranov A.N. Metaforicheskie modeli kak diskursivnye praktiki [Metaphorical Models as Discursive Practices]. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Ser. literatury i yazyka, 2004, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 33–43.
15. Lakoff G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Ortony A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, 1993, pp. 202–251.
16. Baranov A.N. O tipakh sochetaemosti metaforicheskikh modeley [On the Types of Combinability of Metaphorical Models]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2003, no. 2, pp. 73–94.
17. Chudinov A.P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: Kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoy metafory (1991–2000) [Russia in a Metaphorical Mirror: A Cognitive Study of Political Metaphor (1991–2000)]. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 238 p.
18. Ricœur P. Metaforicheskiy protsess kak poznanie, voobrazhenie i oshchushchenie [Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination and Sensation]. Arutyunova N.D., Zhurinskaya M.A. (eds.). Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 416–456.
19. Solov’eva A.S. Verbal’naya realizatsiya sotsiomorfnoy metafory so sferoy-mishen’yu “Evrosoyuz” v britanskikh SMI [Verbal Implementation of Sociomorphic Metaphor with the Target Domain “European Union” in British Media]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2013, no. 4-2, pp. 177–179.