UDC

81’373:821.161.1

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V309

Authors

Nadezhda A. Iliukhina
Samara National Research University;
Moskovskoe sh. 34, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation;
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-2725 e-mail: ilnadezhda@rambler.ru

Abstract

This article considers the connection between cognitive and speech activity through the prism of the concept of shifting the focus of attention. The object of the research is language and speech material that reflects the results of shifting the focus of attention within the framework of information being communicated. The study is aimed to identify and generalize such phenomena as well as analyse the mechanism bringing to the front the most important part of information in an utterance. The shift in the focus of attention, related to the cognitive sphere, projected onto language and speech results in multiform processes that are associated with units of different levels and implement the said intention. Among the most obvious linguistic projections of the shift in the focus of attention, the article describes lexical metonymy in its classical and broader sense, transfer of attribute from one component to another, changes in the lexical content of the positions of the grammatical subject and object, introduction or omission of arguments of a predicate, functional sentence perspective, converse terms, expansion of the metaphorical image as a means of conceptualizing one and the same denotative sphere, etc. Comparison of projections of the shift in the focus of attention onto units of different levels of the language system allows us to identify a general mechanism that ensures the communicative effect of bringing to the front a certain element of the content of an utterance. The general condition for this mechanism is contiguity between the elements of an utterance or the elements of a situation. At the cognitive level, the contiguity of elements is determined by their belonging to one and the same concept, in the case of the phenomena under study, primarily by belonging to the proposition as a type of concept. Based on this, a consistent multilateral variation occurs among the elements associated with the structure of an utterance: words, sentences, concepts, etc. Variation is observed in the form, semantics and denotative reference of a unit. As a result of the analysis, a conclusion was made about a strong community of completely different systemic linguistic phenomena that are associated with bringing to the front a part of an utterance; in other words, they perform one and the same cognitive function.

Keywords

shift in the focus of attention, contiguity in language, metonymy, variation between elements of an utterance, attribute transfer, functional sentence perspective, cognitive metaphor

References

1. Makashova A.V., Mudruk A.A., Smirnova Ya.K. Aytreker issledovanie defitsita sovmestnogo vnimaniya [Eye Tracker Study of Joint Attention Deficit]. Trudy molodykh uchenykh Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, no. 17, pp. 174–177.
2. Chubina E.A. Sdvig fokusa vnimaniya i drugie priemy ukhoda ot dostovernosti v reklame. Smozhet li pomoch’ lingvist pravoprimenitelyu? [Shifting the Focus of Attention and Other Techniques for Avoiding Authenticity in Advertising. Can a Linguist Help a Law Enforcement Officer?]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Theory and Practice of Forensic Examination in Modern Conditions]. 2019, pp. 539–546.
3. Iriskhanova O.K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [Focus Games in Language: Semantics, Syntax and Pragmatics of Defocusing]. Moscow, 2014. 319 p.
4. Kustova G.I. Tipy proizvodnykh znacheniy i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya [Types of Derived Meanings and Mechanisms of Language Expansion]. Moscow, 2004. 472 p.
5. Uryson E.V. Fokus vnimaniya govoryashchego, sdvig semanticheskogo aktsenta i polisemiya [Speaker’s Focus of Attention, Shift in Semantic Emphasis, and Polysemy]. Apresyan V.Yu., Babaeva E.E., Boguslavskaya O.Yu., Galaktionova I.V., Glovinskaya M.Ya., Iomdin B.L., Krylova T.V., Levontina I.B., Ptentsova A.V., Sannikov A.V., Uryson E.V. Prospekt aktivnogo slovarya russkogo yazyka [Prospectus of an Active Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 677–726.
6. Sandakova M.V. Metonimiya prilagatel’nogo v russkom yazyke [Metonymy of the Adjective in the Russian Language: Diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 439 p.
7. Gazheva I.D. Aspekty i metody izucheniya metonimii v sovremennoy lingvistike [Aspects and Methods of Study of Metonymy in Modern Linguistics]. Mova, 2014, no. 21, pp. 150–153.
8. Lisitsyna I.V. Sdvig fokusa vnimaniya kak odin iz osnovnykh mekhanizmov semanticheskoy derivatsii [The Semantic Shift as One of the Most Important Methods in Semantic Derivation]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2007, no. 2-1, pp. 23–27.
9. Trukhanovskaya N.S. Metonimicheskiy sdvig pri kontseptualizatsii denotativnoy situatsii: v sfere predikatov fizicheskogo vozdeystviya [Metonymic Shift in the Conceptualization of a Denotative Situation: In the Sphere of Predicates of Physical Influence: Diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 280 p.
10. Petrova I.M. Variativnost’ kognitivnogo fokusa v glagol’nykh binomakh tipa sow and plough [Variability of the Cognitive Focus in Verbal Binomials Such as Sow and Plough]. Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie, 2020, no. 2, pp. 83–88.
11. Talmy L. Fenomeny vnimaniya [Attention Phenomena]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 2006, no. 2, pp. 23–44.
12. Paducheva E.V. O roli metonimii v kontseptual’nykh strukturakh [On the Role of Metonymy in Conceptual Structures]. Narin’yani A.S. (ed.). Trudy Mezhdunarodnogo seminara “Dialog-99” po komp’yuternoy lingvistike i ee prilozheniyam. T. 1. Teoreticheskie problemy [Proceedings of the International Seminar “Dialogue-99” on Computational Linguistics and Its Applications. Vol. 1. Theoretical Issues]. Tarusa, 1999, pp. 241–251.
13. Paducheva E.V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic Models in the Semantics of Vocabulary]. Moscow, 2004. 608 p.
14. Iliukhina N.A. O tipologii leksicheskoy metonimii v svete kognitivnogo printsipa [On the Typology of Lexical Metonymy in the Light of Cognitive Principle]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, no. 7, pp. 36–48.
15. Iliukhina N.A., Dolgova I.A., Kirillova N.O. Metafora i sistemnost’: semasiologicheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty [Metaphor and Systematicity: Semasiological and Cognitive Aspects]. Samara, 2016. 186 p.
16. Iliukhina N.A. Rol’ otnosheniy smezhnosti v mekhanizme perenosa opredeleniy [The Role of Contiguity in the Mechanism of Attribute Transfer]. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’: lingvokul’turologicheskiy i pragmaticheskiy aspekty [Language System and Speech Activity: Linguoculturological and Pragmatic Aspects]. Iss. 1. Rostov-on-Don, 2007, pp. 86–87.
17. Iliukhina N.A. Transformatsiya metonimii v metaforu v zerkale frazeologii [Transformation of Metonymy into Metaphor in the Mirror of Phraseology]. Koval’ V.I. (ed.). Slavyanskaya frazeologiya v sinkhronii i diakhronii [Slavic Phraseology in Synchrony and Diachrony]. Iss. 1. Gomel, 2011, pp. 258–261.