UDC

[32+327(98)]:94(4)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V310

Authors

Marina M. Panikar
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
nab. Severnoy Dviny 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-8924 e-mail: m.panikar@narfu.ru

Abstract

The article attempts to analyse the international Arctic region during the period from the end of the Cold War to the present. In this timespan, the author identifies two main stages, which differ in the logic of building relations between the regional powers. Special attention is paid to the transformation of the theoretical approaches to the concept of region, characterized by a shift in emphasis from the territorial principle, which defines a region as a specific territory, to the spatial principle, based on functional features. This allows us to explain the processes that took place in the Arctic after the end of the Cold War, when a global region started to form on this territory. In addition, the article highlights the uniqueness of the Arctic due to the impact of rapid climate change on the region’s geopolitical position. The paper analyses the reasons for the change in the logic of the development of international processes in the Arctic from the idea of a global region with intensive international cooperation to confrontation. The author inclines to interpret the main reason for it through the prism of a systematic approach: as a result of the rearrangement of elements in the system of international relations due to the emergence of new poles of power, disagreements with the world hegemon arise, which leads to a redistribution of power. Another specific feature of the international relations in the Arctic is the configuration of regional players, when seven countries create a counterbalance to one Arctic power. This is clearly demonstrated through NATO’s activities in the region and the blocking of Russia’s participation in all forms of regional cooperation. The Arctic countries’ continued reluctance to collaboratе with Russia in the same way as before can also be explained by their growing state egoism.

Keywords

Arctic, global region, international cooperation, climate change, international confrontation, Ukraine crisis

References

1. Heininen L. Special Features of Arctic Geopolitics: A Potential Asset for World Politics. Finger M., Heininen L. (eds.). The Global Arctic Handbook. Cham, 2019, pp. 215–234.
2. Voskresenskiy A.D. Kontseptsii regionalizatsii, regional’nykh podsistem, regional’nykh kompleksov i regional’nykh transformatsiy v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Concepts of Regionalization, Regional Subsystems, Regional Complexes and Regional Transformations in Modern International Relations]. Sravnitel’naya politika, 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 30–58.
3. Kaliev I.A., Temirov A.O. Ponyatie regiona i regional’nykh podsistem v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Concept of Region and Regional Subsystems in International Relations]. Nor. J. Dev. Int. Sci., 2021, no. 68, pp. 39–45. DOI: 10.24412/3453-9875-2021-68-39-45
4. Hettne В., Söderbaum F. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. New Political Econ., 2000, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 457–473. DOI: 10.1080/713687778
5. Lagutina M.K. Global’nyy region kak element mirovoy politicheskoy sistemy XXI veka (na primere Evraziyskogo soyuza) [Global Region as an Element of the World Political System in the 21st Century (the Case of the Eurasian Union): Diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2016. 422 p.
6. Sergunin A., Konyshev V. Russia in the Arctic. Hard or Soft Power? Stuttgart, 2016. 180 p.
7. Sergunin A. Arctic Regional Security. Erokhin V., Gao T., Zhang X. (eds.). Handbook of Research on International Collaboration, Economic Development, and Sustainability in the Arctic. Chicago, 2019, pp. 79–98.
8. Sergunin A.A., Konyshev V.N., Lagutina M.L. Conceptualizing the Arctic. Pak E.V., Krivtsov A.I., Zagrebelnaya N.S. (eds.). The Handbook of the Arctic: A Broad and Comprehensive Overview. Singapore, 2022, pp. 3–17.
9. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. U.S.-Russia Relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or Competition? World Econ. Int. Relat., 2018, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 103–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111
10. Goldin V.I. Arktika v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i geopolitike v XX – nachale XXI veka: vekhi istorii i sovremennost’ [The Arctic Region in the International Relations and Geopolitics in the XX – Early XXI Centuries: Milestones of the History and Modern Times]. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2011, no. 2, pp. 22–34.
11. Goldin V.I. Geopolitika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya v Arktike: uroki istorii, sovremennye protsessy i tendentsii [Geopolitics and International Relations in the Arctic Region: History Lessons, Modern Processes and Trends]. Klio, 2012, no. 5, pp. 129–133.
12. Goldin V.I. Arkticheskaya geopolitika: sovremennye tendentsii i perspektivy [Arctic Geopolitics: Contemporary Tendencies and Perspectives]. Klio, 2014, no. 1, pp. 129–133.
13. Lukin Yu.F. Velikiy peredel Arktiki [The Great Redivision of the Arctic]. Arkhangelsk, 2010. 400 p.
14. Lukin Yu.F. Rossiyskaya Arktika v izmenyayushchemsya mire [Russian Arctic in the Changing World]. Arkhangelsk, 2013. 281 p.
15. Pilyasov A.N. Arkticheskoe sredizemnomor’e: predposylki formirovaniya novogo makroregiona [The Arctic Mediterranean Region: Prerequisites for the Formation of a New Macroregion]. EKO. Vserossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2010, no. 12, pp. 54–75.
16. Timofeev I.N. et al. (comps.). Arkticheskiy region: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [The Arctic Region: Problems of International Cooperation]. Moscow, 2013. 663 p.
17. Zagorskiy A.V. (ed.). Arktika: zona mira i sotrudnichestva [The Arctic: A Zone of Peace and Cooperation]. Moscow, 2011. 195 p.
18. Pak E.V., Krivtsov A.I., Zagrebelnaya N.S. (eds.). The Handbook of the Arctic: A Broad and Comprehensive Overview. Singapore, 2022. 1223 p.
19. Finger M., Heininen L. (eds.). The Global Arctic Handbook. Cham, 2019, pp. 215–234.
20. Finger M., Rekvig G. (eds.). Global Arctic: An Introduction to the Multifaceted Dynamics of the Arctic. Cham, 2022. 486 p.
21. Heininen L. (ed.). Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate. New York, 2016. 141 p.
22. Byers M. International Law and the Arctic. Cambridge, 2013. 314 p.
23. Keskitalo C. International Region-Building: Development of the Arctic as an International Region. Coop. Confl., 2007, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 187–205. DOI: 10.1177/0010836707076689
24. Stokke O.S. Environmental Security in the Arctic: The Case for Multilevel Governance. Int. J., 2011, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 835–848.
25. Hurrell A. Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Rev. Int. Stud., 1995, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 331–358. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210500117954
26. Toynbee A.J. Postizhenie istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow, 2004. 640 p.
27. Kaplan M.A. System and Process in International Politics. New York, 1957. 260 p.