UDC

130.2:331

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V289

Authors

Aleksey I. Ivanenko
Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design; ul. Ivana Chernykh 4, St. Petersburg, 198095, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-7179 e-mail: iwanenkoalexy@hotmail.com

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of the definition of labour, which has been gaining relevance in the conditions of the post-industrial society and recognition of such practices as active rest, domestic work, services, volunteering etc. A classical interpretation viewed labour as a productive activity to transform nature. Nowadays, however, it is becoming increasingly important to protect the environment rather than transform it. The paper describes the paradoxes of hunter and peasant, where one and the same activity, depending on the perspective, can be regarded as work, play, rest or exploitation. The author suggests the following definition of labour: a socially demanded human activity. Special attention is given here to the analysis of unproductive labour, which can be subdivided into service and services. While the former is aimed to meet the needs of society as a whole (Fatherland), the latter are performed for individuals. Thus, the following activities can be considered as service: teaching, medical practice, military activities, civil service and transportation. Work is opposed to rest, which can be passive (sleep and relaxation) as well as active (eating, communication, walking and certain games). The author points out that the work–play opposition is not absolute, since professional sport and acting are now considered labour. In the Soviet Union, for instance, state awards, such as the Hero of Socialist Labour, were given to the ballet dancers Galina Ulanova and Maya Plisetskaya as well as to the football player Lev Yashin. At the same time, when there is no longer a social demand for certain work, it can be transformed into rest, thus becoming a hobby.

Keywords

philosophy of labour, services, rest, service, play, leisure, hobby, sport

References

1. Nekhoda E.V. Transformatsiya truda i sotsial’no-trudovykh otnosheniy v usloviyakh perekhoda k postindustrial’nomu obshchestvu [Transformation of Labour and Social-Labour Relations Under Condition to Postindustrial Society]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 302, pp. 160–166.
2. Engels F. Anteil der Arbeit an der Menschwerdung des Affen. Dialektik der Natur. Available at: http://www.mlwerke.de/me/me20/me20_444.htm (accessed: 28 January 2023).
3. Dzoblaeva V.Kh., Zaytseva M.V. Sootnoshenie kategoriy truda i otdykha [The Ratio of the Categories of Work and Rest]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2019, vol. 4-2, pp. 211–213. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10844
4. Pushkin A.V. Okhota – chast’ dukhovnoy zhizni obshchestva [Hunting as a Part of the Cultural Life of the Society]. Gumanitarnye aspekty okhoty i okhotnich’ego khozyaystva, 2016, no. 1, pp. 17–20.
5. Le Goff J. La сivilisation de l’Occident médiéval. Paris, 1984 (Russ. ed.: Le Goff Zh. Tsivilizatsiya srednevekovogo Zapada. Moscow, 1992. 376 p.).
6. Aristotle. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 4. Moscow, 1983. 830 p.
7. Marx K. Capital. Vol. 1. Available at: https://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Kapital1/index.html (accessed: 15 March 2023) (in Russ.).
8. Kravchenko A.L. Trudovye praktiki v optike postdelezianskikh teoriy: sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz [Labor Practices in the Optics of Post-Deleuze Theories: Socio-Philosophical Analysis]. Gumanitarnyy vestnik, 2021, no. 5. Art. no. 3. DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2021-5-740
9. Volkova A.A. Sfera uslug: teoreticheskiy analiz [The Sphere of Services: A Theoretical Analysis]. Izvestiya SanktPeterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 4, pp. 11–16.
10. Malkova M.A., Roshchina Ya.M. Tipologicheskiy analiz domashnego truda v sovremennoy rossiyskoy sem’e [Typological Analysis of Domestic Work in the Modern Russian Family]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2011, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 147–166.
11. Karakhanova T.M. Domashniyy trud kak potrebitel’skaya deyatel’nost’ [Domestic Work as Consumption Behavior]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii, 2014, no. 1, pp. 108–130.
12. Baudrillard J. L’échange symbolique et la mort. Paris, 1976. 347 p.
13. Huizinga J. Homo ludens; Stat’i po istorii kul’tury [Homo Ludens; Articles on Cultural History]. Moscow, 1997. 416 p.
14. Marx K. Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844]. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/marx/1844/manuscr/index.htm (accessed: 15 October 2023).