CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

The Semantics of Actionality in the Ethnopolitical Context (Exemplified by Russian and English Set Phrases). P. 45–55

Версия для печати

Section: Linguistics

UDC

81’37

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V294

Authors

Anatoliy P. Vasilenko
Bryansk State Academician I.G. Petrovski University; ul. Bezhitskaya 14, Bryansk, 241036, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8777-5743 e-mail: a.p.vasilenko@mail.ru
Snezhana A. Koren’kova
Bryansk State Academician I.G. Petrovski University; ul. Bezhitskaya 14, Bryansk, 241036, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4051-6187 e-mail: snezhick.b@mail.ru

Abstract

This paper analyses the semantics of set phrases in terms of the ethnopolitical space (geopolitonyms). Phraseological units are studied here from the point of view of constructive (calling for peace) and destructive (resisting violence) actionality. The constructive actionality group represents the metaphorization of prohibition, either strict or advisory, calling for peace through nonviolent means. The set phrases of this group emphasize unity, strength and mutual support as well as a call for conflict suspension. The group of destructive actionality demonstrates aspects of confrontation aimed to prevent an adversary’s aggression. The set phrases of this group express confrontation, opposition and readiness for self-defence. Having analysed the set phrases, the authors identified the component modification of the specific reflection of reality during ethnopolitical processes. This modification reflects the national factor and the worldview of a people. In the course of ethnopolitical activity, the identified types of metaphorical structures are manifested in slogans calling for avoidance of conflict situations. Phraseological constructive actionality can be found in the settlement of disputes, while destructive actionality, in readiness for stabilization and resistance (through direct clashes) in the current destabilized situation. The main function of such set phrases is avoiding destructive actions, at the same time being able to recode information and carry hidden meanings to achieve certain goals while distracting the subject. By demonstrating actionality of constructive and destructive actions, phraseological phrases are able to exert impact of varying degrees.

Keywords

phraseological unit, constructive actionality, destructive actionality, component modification, geopolitonym
Download (pdf, 0.6MB )

References

1. Teliya V.N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’torologicheskiy aspekty [Russian Phraseology. Semantic, Pragmatic and Linguocultural Aspects]. Moscow, 1996. 288 p.
2. Vasilenko A.P. Phraseological Units Based on the Idea of Social Confrontation in Military Slang. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, no. 1, pp. 117–128 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2022-10114
3. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 1980. 242 p. (Russ. ed.: Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow, 2004. 256 p.).
4. Koren’kova S.A. Konnotativnaya semantika ‘vozdeystviya’ (na materiale frazeologizmov voennoy tematiki) [The Connotative Semantics of ‘Pressure’ (Exemplified by the Military Phraseological Units)]. Filologicheskiy aspekt: mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2023, no. 1, pp. 20-24.
5. Podol’skaya N.V. Slovar’ russkoy onomasticheskoy terminologii [Dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terms]. Moscow, 1978. 200 p.
6. Kryukova I.V. Pragmatika onima: napravleniya issledovaniy i metodika analiza [Pragmatics of Onym: Area of Research and Analysis Methods]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2011, no. 8, pp. 139–142.
7. Savchuk I.P. Evolyutsiya mifolingvisticheskikh kharakteristik geopolitonima SIBIR’ (na materiale sovremennykh SMI) [The Evolution of the Mytholinguistic Characteristics of the Geopolitonym SIBERIA (Based on the Material of Modern Media): Diss.]. Moscow, 2021. 216 p.
8. Karbulatova I.S., Patenko G.R. Osnovnye problemy imidzhevoy politiki regiona v diskurse vizual’noy kommunikatsii [The Main Problems of the Image Policy of the Region in the Discourse of Visual Communication]. Vizual’naya kommunikatsiya v sotsiokul’turnoy dinamike [Visual Communication in Sociocultural Dynamics]. Kazan, 2015, pp. 487–495.
9. Shulezhkova S.G. Krylatye vyrazheniya russkogo yazyka, ikh istochniki i razvitie [Winged Words of the Russian Language, Their Sources and Development]. Moscow, 2002. 286 p.
10. Buchanan P.J. The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. New York, 2002. 308 p. (Russ. ed.: B’yukenen P.Dzh. Smert’ Zapada. Moscow, 2003. 444 p.).

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North