UDC

94(47).084.3:67

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V280

Authors

Tat’yana I. Troshina
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
Northern State Medical University;
ul. Smol’nyy Buyan 7, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-5949

e-mail: tatr-arh@mail.ru

Abstract

This article dwells on the labour relations at the timber enterprises of the Arkhangelsk Province granted by the Soviet government as a concession to foreign entrepreneurs in the 1920s. The main sources include archival (concession contracts and reports, results of inspections of concessionary enterprises by the authorities, shorthand reports of meetings of Soviet party and trade union organizations, materials of factory rates commissions and investigative and judicial authorities), as well as published sources, primarily, contemporary (publications in newspapers and magazines). Emphasis is placed on the authorities’ attitude to labour conflicts. Timber enterprise concessions were of great international importance to the central government and economic importance to the local authorities; therefore, unlike at other concessionary enterprises, the authorities often supported the “capitalists”. The concessionaires, in their turn, being interested in attracting skilled workers to their enterprises and seeking to normalize relations with the population and the authorities on the territory designated for forest exploitation, were accommodating the employees by spending substantial funds to build housing as well as social and cultural facilities in the factory settlements. Labour relations and conflicts are examined in the article using the example of four personnel categories: skilled workers; labourers at the sawmills; peasants engaged in logging and delivering timber to the factories (loggers and rafters, united in artels); administrative and clerical employees. In addition, a conclusion is made about the specificity of labour conflicts caused by the post-revolutionary social expectations of the population.

Keywords

timber industry, foreign concessions, Arkhangelsk Province, labour conflicts, Soviet labour legislation, New Economic Policy

References

1. Zagorul’ko M.M., Yudina T.V. Problemy trudovykh i sotsial’nykh prav naseleniya SSSR na kontsessionnykh predpriyatiyakh v 1920-e gody [Problems of Labour and Social Rights of the Population of the USSR at Concessionary Enterprises in the 1920s]. Volgograd, 2007. 54 p.
2. Urazova S.A. Osobennosti raboty profsoyuzov na chastnykh predpriyatiyakh v gody nepa [Trade Unions Activity Features in Private Enterprises During New Economic Policy Period]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2012, no. 6, pt. 1, pp. 193–196.
3. Yudina T.V. Sovetskie rabochie i sluzhashchie na kontsessionnykh predpriyatiyakh SSSR v gody novoy ekonomicheskoy politiki [Soviet Workers and Office-Based Employees at Concessionary Enterprises of the USSR During the Period of the New Economic Policy: Diss.]. Volgograd, 2010. 573 p.
4. Yudina T.V. Sotsial’no-trudovye konflikty na kontsessionnykh predpriyatiyakh SSSR v 1920-e gg. [Social and Labour Conflicts at Soviet Concessionary Enterprises in the 1920s]. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik, 2009, no. 1, pp. 45–53.
5. Krasilnikov S.A. Power Сrises and Labor Conflicts During the NEP Period. EKO, 2021, no. 4, pp. 45–70 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-4-45-70
6. Rasskazimov A.A. Vseobshchaya zabastovka 1930 g. v Sibiri kak sredstvo likvidatsii kontsessii “Lena Gol’dfil’ds Limited” [The General Strike of 1930 in Siberia as a Means to Liquidate the Concession of “Lena Goldfields Ltd”]. Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri, 2018, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 100–104. DOI: 10.15372/HSS20180418
7. Levin M.I., Sheveleva I.V. Foreign Concessions in the Soviet Union of the 1920s: “Why Split Up”? Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no. 1, pp. 138–158 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-1-138-158
8. Kiselev A.A. Kontsessii na Evropeyskom Severe SSSR [Concessions in the European North of the USSR]. Voprosy istorii, 1972, no. 7, pp. 26–35.
9. Abrahamsen E. Vinter i Seregovo-skogen: Erindringer fra det norske trelasteventyret i Russland. Orkana, 2015. 185 p. (Russ. ed.: Abrakhamsen E. Iz Seregova v Onegu. Vospominaniya o norvezhskom lesnom biznese v Rossii. Arkhangelsk, 2016. 213 p.).
10. Troshina T.I. “Krest’yanstvo rubit les dlya sebya v shirokikh razmerakh, bez vsyakikh razresheniy, net sredstv prekratit’ samovol’nye porubki”. Severnaya derevnya v 1917 g. [“Peasants Cut Down Trees Wholesale for Their Own Use, Without License, and There’s No Way of Putting a Stop to This Unauthorized Felling”: Northern Village in 1917]. Vestnik arkhivista, 2017, no. 2, pp. 87–101.
11. Gernet S.M. Arkhangel’sk v istorii russko-shvedskikh otnosheniy [Arkhangelsk in the History of Russia–Sweden Relations]. Nizov V.V. (ed.). Shvedy i Russkiy Sever: istoriko-kul’turnye svyazi [Swedes and the Russian North: Historical and Cultural Ties]. Kirov, 1997, pp. 195−199.