UDC

[122/129+32]:37

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V272

Authors

Artem V. Makulin
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
nab. Severnoy Dviny 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.o rg/0000-0002-7028-9650

e-mail: a.makulin@narfu.ru

Мoris А. Mirelli
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
nab. Severnoy Dviny 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-7109

e-mail: moris.mirelli@yahoo.com

Abstract

This article examines the socio-epistemological functions of science, the scientific community and the education system as the most important elements of soft power. A socio-philosophical interpretation of the concept of soft power through the prism of social epistemology is provided. Further, the author identifies the fundamental structural and functional features of this phenomenon, originating from the modern specifics of civilizational interaction, based on the agenda of globalization and on the making of the information society. The results of the study revealed methodological difficulties in interpreting the role of science in the manifestations and use of soft power due to the fact that science and the education system inherent in it are traditionally considered as a universal cognitive activity of humankind involving obtaining and disseminating new knowledge and cannot be directly reduced to instruments of political influence. However, the article notes that the scientific communities and the results of their activities are actually used as a soft (smart) power aimed at controlled transformation of global geopolitical actors. It is not only the problems of cognitive capitalism, tragedies of the anticommons and brain drain, but also the strategies of Russian science and education for establishing the country’s cognitive sovereignty that are considered to be new conditions for the functioning of science and education as elements of soft power in the system of digital globalization. The primary purpose of this article is to study the socioepistemological significance of soft power in the transformation of the role of science and education on the one hand, and geopolitical interaction of global players on the other. The research methodology is based on the ideas of historicism, social epistemology and complexity of open social systems, as well as on the theoretical analysis of socio-political and socio-philosophical literature. The article concludes by outlining ways of creating a new interpretation of the manifestations of soft power in the field of science and education.

Keywords

soft power, reflexive control, science, education system, social epistemology, cognitive sovereignty, instruments of political influence

References

1. Antyukhova E.A. Education as a Soft Power in Modern Foreign and Russian Politological Research. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 197–209 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.4.17
2. Lebedeva M.M., Fort J. Vysshee obrazovanie kak potentsial “myagkoy sily” Rossii [Higher Education as Soft Power Potential of Russia]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2009, no. 6, pp. 200–205.
3. Torkunov A.V. Obrazovanie kak instrument “myagkoy sily” vo vneshney politike Rossii [Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russia’s Foreign Policy]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2012, no. 4, pp. 85–93.
4. Masich V.A. Nauka i obrazovanie kak instrumenty “myagkoy sily” [Science and Education as the Instruments of “Soft Power”]. Vestnik RGGU. Ser.: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie, 2015, no. 1, pp. 117–125.
5. Nye J.S. Jr. “Myagkaya sila” i amerikano-evropeyskie otnosheniya [Soft Power and European-American Affairs]. Svobodnaya mysl’-XXI, 2004, no. 10. Available at: http://smartpowerjournal.ru/soft-power/ (accessed: 20 February 2022).
6. McClory J. The Soft Power 30: A Global Ranking of Soft Power. Portland, 2015. Available at: https://portlandcommunications.com/pdf/The-Soft-Power_30.pdf (accessed: 20 February 2022).
7. Kharitonova E.M. Reyting “myagkoy sily” The Soft Power 30 [The Soft Power 30 Ranking]. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/news/events/text/reyting-myagkoy-sili-the-soft-power-30?ret=640 (accessed: 20 February 2022).
8. Vainrauh V. Indeks “Global’noy myagkoy sily” Global Soft Power Index 2022: Soedinennye Shtaty stali liderom [Global Soft Power Index 2022: The US Is on Top]. Available at: https://internationalwealth.info/news-of-the-offshore/indeks-globalnoj-mjagkoj-sily-global-soft-powe... (accessed: 20 February 2022).
9. Thomas T.L. Refleksivnoe upravlenie v Rossii: teoriya i voennye prilozheniya [Russia’s Reflexive Control: Theory and Military Uses]. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie, 2002, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–89.
10. Merton R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, 1968. 702 p. (Russ. ed.: Merton R.K. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura. Moscow, 2006. 873 p.).
11. Makulin A.V. Syr’evaya nauka i el’dorado kolonial’nykh uchenykh [Resource-Based Science and the El Dorado of Colonial Scientists]. Opravin A.S. (ed.). Meditsinskoe obrazovanie v XXI veke: traditsii i innovatsii [Medical Education in the 21st Century: Traditions and Innovations]. Arkhangelsk, 2015, pp. 58–60.
12. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York, 1997. 223 p. (Russ. ed.: Bzhezinskiy Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska: gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy. Moscow, 2014. 702 p.).
13. Graham L.R. Lonely Ideas: Can Russia Compete? Cambridge, 2013. 204 p.
14. Dynnik M.A. (ed.). Materialisty drevney Gretsii. Sobranie tekstov Geraklita, Demokrita i Epikura [Materialists of Ancient Greece. Collected Texts by Heraclitus, Democritus and Epicurus]. Moscow, 1955. 238 p.
15. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, 1984. 241 p.
16. Korzina M.I. Sotsial’no-filosofskiy aspekt tekhnologiy vizual’nykh kommunikatsiy v usloviyakh novykh vyzovov Chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii [Socio-Philosophical Aspect of Visual Communication Technologies in the Context of New Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Diss.]. Arkhangelsk, 2021. 239 p.
17. Makulin A.V. Evolyutsiya tablichnogo metoda v istorii filosofii: ot mistiki Drevnego Vostoka do novoevropeyskogo myshleniya [The Evolution of the Tabular Method in the History of Philosophy: From Mysticism of the Ancient East to the Early Modern Thought]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura, 2015, no, 6, pp. 24–26.
18. Montaigne M. Opyty [The Essays]. Moscow, 1954–1960. Vol. 1. 1954. 558 p.
19. Anisimova V.B., Askarov U.Y., Bakaev I.V., et al. Aktual’nye problemy istorii i filosofii nauki [Topical Issues of the History and Philosophy of Science]. Moscow, 2018. 153 p.
20. Chernozub S.P. Kontsept natsional’noy nauki v novom diskurse tsivilizatsiy [The Concept of National Science in the New Civilization Discourse]. Istoricheskaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya istorii, 2012, no. 1, pp. 43–61.
21. Fominykh A. “Myagkaya moshch’” obmennykh programm [“Soft” Power of Exchange Programs]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–85.
22. Ikonnikova N.K. Professional’naya i grazhdanskaya identichnost’ uchenykh v zerkale global’noy akademicheskoy mobil’nosti [Professional and Civic Identity of Scientists in the Mirror of Global Academic Mobility]. Voprosy sotsial’noy teorii, 2011, vol. 5, pp. 319–336.
23. Shevchenko V.N. Zhiznesposobnost’ Rossiyskogo gosudarstva kak filosofsko-politicheskaya problema [Viability of the Russian State as a Philosophical and Political Problem]. Shevchenko V.N. (ed.). Zhiznesposobnost’ Rossiyskogo gosudarstva kak filosofsko-politicheskaya problema [Viability of the Russian State as a Philosophical and Political Problem]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 5–40.
24. 2021 HEPI Soft-Power Index: UK Slips Further Behind the US (Again). Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2021/09/02/2021-hepi-soft-power-index-uk-slips-further-behind-the-us-again/ (accessed: 20 February 2023).