UDC

13:2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V261

Authors

Mariya S. Lyutaeva
Vladimir State University;
ul. Gor’kogo 87, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9972-6674 e-mail: liutaeva@yandex.ru

Abstract

The conceptual network used in modern religious studies is being constantly updated and supplemented with new terms, while “classical” concepts are undergoing semantic shifts as well. This paper is focused on the history of the notions of lived religion and vernacular religion, which entered the scientific lexicon in the late 20th century. Both terms relate to the study of everyday life and its philosophical understanding and are based on extensive empirical research as well as anthropological data. The concepts of lived religion and vernacular religion were proposed by scholars as an alternative to the traditional and widespread binary schemes for describing religion, which contrast the high/low, elite/folk and institutionalized/non-institutionalized forms of religion. The genesis and spread of these concepts reflected the general trend, which consists in refraining from applying a uniform Western European model and denominational theological discourse to the variable phenomena of religious experience. The term lived religion, which originated in memoirs and biographical literature, characterized the personal experience of Christians, extending to the daily religious practices of various traditions. Vernacular religion goes back to the Latin word vernaculus, which had been used to describe something native, local, domestic and, later, to distinguish the local language from the official Latin. The term was proposed by philologists to solve religious problems of studying unorganized, spontaneous, everyday and individual forms of manifestation of religion. Currently, both terms are being successfully used, including in Russian scientific discourse, in religious studies on various phenomena of materialization, kitsch, gender and many other aspects of religion.

Keywords

lived religion, vernacular religion, religion of everyday life, religious studies

References

1. Smirnov M.Yu., Bokova O.A. Metodologiya religiovedeniya kak problema [Methodology of Religious Studies as a Problem]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2017, no. 3, pp. 133–146.
2. Harvey G. Food, Sex and Strangers: Understanding Religion as Everyday Life. Routledge, 2014 (Russ. ed.: Kharvi G. Seks, eda i neznakomtsy. Religiya kak povsednevnaya zhizn’. Moscow, 2020. 368 p.).
3. Elbakyan E. Povsednevnost’ religii ili religiya povsednevnosti? [Everyday Life of Religion or Religion of Everyday Life]. Available at: http://www.religiopolis.org/religiovedenie/5985-povsednevnost-religii-ili-religija-povsednevnosti.html (accessed: 18 October 2022).
4. Bikbov A.T. Grammatika poryadka: Istoricheskaya sotsiologiya ponyatiy, kotorye menyayut nashu real’nost’ [The Grammar of Order: Historical Sociology of Concepts That Change Our Life]. Moscow, 2014. 432 p.
5. Luhmann N. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, 1990. 732 p. (Russ. ed.: Luman N. Istina, znanie, nauka kak sistema. Moscow, 2016. 408 p.).
6. Niedźwiedź A. Ot “narodnoy religioznosti” k “prozhivaemoy religii”: diskussiya v pol’skoy antropologii religii [From “Folk Religiosity” to “Lived Religion”: Terminological Debate Within the Polish Anthropology of Religion]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2016, no. 3, pp. 172–188.
7. Wanner C. Perezhivaemaya religiya: kontseptual’naya skhema dlya ponimaniya pogrebal’nykh obryadov v prigranichnykh rayonakh Sovetskoy Ukrainy [Lived Religion: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Death Rituals in Soviet Ukrainian Borderlands]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2012, no. 3-4, pp. 464–484.
8. Trubina E.G., Saeed L. Ot issledovaniy povsednevnosti k issledovaniyam religioznoy povsednevnosti: ponyatie “zhivoy religii” [From “Everyday Life” to “Everyday Religion”: “Lived Religion” Notion]. Manuskript, 2020, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 185–188. DOI: 10.30853/mns200514
9. Hughes A.W., McCutcheon R.T. Religion in 50 Words: A Critical Vocabulary. New York, 2022. 320 p.
10. James W. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York, 1902. 534 p. (Russ. ed.: Dzheyms U. Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta. Moscow, 1993. 432 p.).
11. Waardenburg J.D.J. Official and Popular Religion as a Problem in Islamic Studies. Vrijhof P.H., Waardenburg J. (eds.). Official and Popular Religion: Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies. The Hague, 1979, pp. 340–386.
12. Samarina T.S. Religiovedcheskoe nasledie Zhaka Vaardenburga: kriticheskiy analiz [Religious Heritage of Jacques Waardenburg: A Critical Analysis]. Religiovedenie, 2019, no. 3, pp. 117–126. DOI: 10.22250/20728662.2019.3.117-126
13. Orsi R. Everyday Miracles: The Study of Lived Religion. Hall D.D. (ed.). Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice. Princeton, 1997, pp. 3–21.
14. McGuire M.B. Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York, 2007. 290 p.
15. Primiano L.N. Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious Folklife. West. Folk., 1995, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 37–56.
16. Panchenko A.A. Khristovshchina i skopchestvo: fol’klor i traditsionnaya kul’tura russkikh misticheskikh sekt [Khlysts and Skoptsy: Folklore and Traditional Culture of Russian Mystical Sects]. Moscow, 2002. 544 p.
17. Smilyanskaya E.B. Volshebniki. Bogokhul’niki. Eretiki: narodnaya religioznost’ i “dukhovnye prestupleniya” v Rossii XVIII v. [Wizards. Blasphemers. Heretics: Folk Religiosity and “Spiritual Crimes” in 18th-Century Russia]. Moscow, 2003. 464 p.
18. Kryukova N.V. Vernakulyarnoe khristianstvo v sel’skoy Armenii [Vernacular Christianity in Rural Armenia]. Anchabadze Yu.D. (ed.). Armyane v istoricheskikh i etnokul’turnykh protsessakh XVIII–XXI vv. [Armenians in the Historical and Ethnocultural Processes of the 18th – 21st Centuries]. Moscow, 2021, pp. 177–198.
19. Radchenko D.A. “Ne zabyvayte Boga”: vernakulyarnaya religioznost’ sovetskikh “svyatykh pisem” [“Do Not Forget God”. Vernacular Religiosity in Soviet Heavenly Letters]. Vestnik RGGU. Ser.: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie, 2018, no. 9, pp. 90–101. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6355-2018-9-90-101
20. Arinin E.I. “Vernakulyarnaya religioznost’”: urovni autopoyezisa v global’nom i lokal’nom kontekstakh [“Vernacular Religiosity”: Levels of Autopoiesis in Global and Local Contexts]. Kasavin I.T., Nevvazhay I.D., Shipovalova L.V., Artamonov D.S. (eds.). Posle postpozitivizma [After Postpositivism]. Moscow, 2022, pp. 483–485.
21. Markova N.M., Liutaeva M.S. People’s Religion in Cross-Cultural Communication: Conceptualization of Native / Vernacular. Concept Philos. Relig. Cult., 2022, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 125–137 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24833/2541-8831-20221-21-125-137
22. Frazer J.G. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. London, 1923. 756 p. (Russ. ed.: Frezer D.D. Zolotaya vetv’: Issledovanie magii i religii. Moscow, 1986. 702 p.).