UDC

811.161.1’42:821.161.1Бродский(045)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V268

Authors

Alina R. Galimullina
Udmurt State University;
ul. Universitetskaya 1, korp. 2, Izhevsk, 426034, Respublika Udmurtiya, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-2416 e-mail: alina.galimullina.rus@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper is focused on the phenomenon of functional-grammatical maximalism of the independent infinitive, exemplified by Joseph Brodsky’s poetic texts. The expression in them of three predicative categories of the infinitive – time, person and mood – is analysed. The specific features of this expression include: a unique temporal plane of action, expressed in a literary text by the infinitive through its internal time, i.e. the aspect; a composite image of the subject of an infinitive text, i.e. a meta-subject, in which the Self of the speaker merges with the Self of the listener, represented by both the second and the third person or by the seeming absence of the person; and meditative modality characteristic of Brodsky’s infinitive writing, gravitating towards semantic hyperbolism, i.e. the theme of another, unattainable existence. The author used the functional-grammatical, semantic and contextual analyses, generally applied in poetic grammar. The analysis found a combination of homogeneity, formal minimalism and functional maximalism of the infinitive. In addition, the following lexical-grammatical methods of expressing this phenomenon were identified in Brodsky’s poems: the category of aspect and semantics of infinitives, which contribute to changing the nature of time in a poetic text and to expressing the subject’s attitude to the action of debitive, epistemic and meditative modality; additional temporal indicators in the form of secondary parts of the sentence helping to create a time cycle in the text; personal pronouns indicating the presence of persons in contact with the subject of the infinitive action. The phenomenon analysed in this paper can be explained by the nature of the infinitive, which is indefinite and ambiguous and, therefore, has high functional potential. This makes the topic under discussion interesting for linguists and calls for an in-depth study of this linguistic unit using different types of texts.

Keywords

infinitive, infinitive poetry, temporality, meta-subject, meditative modality, J. Brodsky

References

1. Zholkovskiy A.K. Infinitivnoe pis’mo: tropy i syuzhety [ Infinitive Writing: Tropes and Plots]. Vakhtina P.L., Dolinin A.A., Kats B.A., et al. (eds.). Etkindovskie chteniya I [Etkind Readings I]. St. Petersburg, 2003, pp. 250–271.
2. Zholkovskiy A.K. Brodskiy i infinitivnoe pis’mo. Materialy k teme [Brodsky and Infinitive Writing (Materials on the Subject)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000, no. 45, pp. 187–198.
3. Jakobson R.O. Poeziya grammatiki i grammatika poezii [Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry]. Stepanov Yu.S. (ed.). Semiotika [Semiotics]. Moscow, 1983, pp. 462–482.
4. Zolotova G.A., Onipenko N.K., Sidorova M.Yu. Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communicative Grammar of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1998. 528 p.
5. Kovtunova I.I. Poeticheskiy sintaksis [Poetic Syntax]. Moscow, 1986. 206 p.
6. Panchenko O.N. Nominativnye i infinitivnye ryady v stroe stikhotvoreniya [Nominative and Infinitive Rows in the Structure of a Poem]. Krasil’nikova E.V. (ed.). Ocherki istorii yazyka russkoy poezii XX veka. Grammaticheskie kategorii. Sintaksis teksta [Essays on the History of the Language of 20th-Century Russian Poetry. Grammatical Categories. Syntax of the Text]. Moscow, 1993, pp. 81–100.
7. Zmazneva O.A. Infinitivnye ryady v poeticheskom sintaksise Maksimiliana Voloshina [Infinitive Rows in Maximilian Voloshin’s Poetic Syntax]. Shtayn K.E. (ed.). Yazykovaya deyatel’nost’: perekhodnost’ i sinkretizm [Linguistic Activity: Transitivity and Syncretism]. Iss. 7. Moscow, 2001, pp. 345–347.
8. Chernyakov A.N. Infinitivnoe ili nominativnoe pis’mo? K opisaniyu odnogo fragmenta “poezii grammatiki” [Infinitive or Nominative Writing? A Description of One Fragment of the “Poetry of Grammar”]. Tsvigun T.V., Chernyakova A.N. (eds.). Al’ternativnyy tekst: versiya i kontrversiya [Alternative Text: Version and Counterversion]. Kaliningrad, 2007. Iss. 2, pp. 80–90.
9. Chernyakov A.N. “Fevral’” B. Pasternaka: infinitivnoe pis’mo i ego perevody [B. Pasternak’s “February”: Infinitive Writing and Its Translations]. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 2014, no. 8, pp. 28–32.
10. Milyutina M.G. Functional Grammar in the Service of Poetry (Infinitive Writing in Poetical Texts by B. Akhmadulina, I. Brodsky, A. Kushner). Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, 2021, no. 4, pp. 276–288 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/18137083/77/21
11. Bondarko A.V., Belyaeva E.I., Biryulin L.A., et al. Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki: Temporal’nost’. Modal’nost’ [Theory of Functional Grammar: Temporality. Modality]. Leningrad, 1990. 262 p.
12. Bondarko A.V. Lingvistika teksta v sisteme funktsional’noy grammatiki [Text Linguistics in the System of Functional Grammar]. Tekst. Struktura i semantika [Text. Structure and Semantics]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2001, pp. 4–13. Available at: http://philology.ru/linguistics1/bondarko-01.htm (accessed: 14 June 2022).
13. Zholkovskiy A.K. (comp.). Russkaya infinitivnaya poeziya XVIII–XX vekov. Antologiya [Russian Infinitive Poetry of the 18th – 20th Centuries. An Anthology]. Moscow, 2020. 560 p.
14. Zholkovskiy A.K. K probleme infinitivnoy poezii: Ob intertekstual’nom fone stikhotvoreniya S. Gandlevskogo “Ustroit’sya na avtobazu…” [On Infinitive Poetry: Intertextual Background of S. Gandlevsky’s Poem “To Get a Job at the Motor Depot...”]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 2002, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 34–42.
15. Guillaume G. Printsipy teoreticheskoy lingvistiki [Principles of Theoretical Linguistics]. Moscow, 1992. 224 p.
16. Ionova I.A. Esteticheskaya produktivnost’ morfologicheskikh sredstv yazyka v poezii [Aesthetic Productivity of Morphological Means of Language in Poetry]. Kishinev, 1989. 139 p.
17. Stahl H., Evgrashkina E. (eds.). Sub”ekt v noveyshey russkoyazychnoy poezii – teoriya i praktika [Subject in Contemporary Russian-Language Poetry: Theory and Practice]. Berlin, 2018. 440 p. Available at: https://www.peterlang.com/document/1110741 (accessed: 20 August 2022).
18. Sidorova M.Yu., Lipgart A.A. Grammatika sovremennoy russkoy poezii: sub”ektnaya perspektiva, predikativnye kategorii, modusnye ramki (chast’ 1) [Grammar of Modern Russian Poetry: Subjective Perspective, Predicative Categories, Modus Frames (Part I)]. Filologiya i chelovek, 2018, no. 3, pp. 21–38. DOI: 10.14258/filichel(2018)3-02
19. Adamec P. Semanticheskaya interpretatsiya “znachimykh nuley” v russkikh predlozheniyakh [Semantic Interpretation of “Meaningful Zeros” in Russian Sentences]. Birnbaum H., Flier M.S. (eds.). Yazyk i stikh v Rossii [Language and Verse in Russia]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 9–18.
20. Onipenko N.K. Kategoriya sub”ekta i egotsentricheskaya grammaticheskaya tekhnika v khudozhestvennom tekste [Category of Subject and Egocentric Grammatical Technique in the Literary Text]. Gramatyka a tekst [Grammar and Text]. Katowice, 2011, pp. 64–79.
21. Vinogradov V.V. O kategorii modal’nosti i modal’nykh slovakh v russkom yazyke [On the Category of Modality and Modal Words in the Russian Language]. Issledovaniya po russkoy grammatike [Research on Russian Grammar]. Moscow, 1975, pp. 53–87.
22. Timofeev K.A. Ob osnovnykh tipakh infinitivnykh predlozheniy v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke [On the Main Types of Infinitive Sentences in the Modern Russian Literary Language]. Voprosy sintaksisa sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Issues of the Syntax of the Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, 1950. 410 p.
23. Vinogradov V.V. Russkiy yazyk (Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove) [The Russian Language (Grammatical Teaching About the Word)]. Moscow, 1947. 784 p.