CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

General Effective Aktionsart in the Modern Ossetian Language (Compared with Russian). C. 56-65

Версия для печати

Section: Linguistics

UDC

81ʼ44; 811.221.18

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V263

Authors

Alina A. Levitskaya
Institute of History and Archeology of the Republic of North Ossetia – Alania;
ul. Vatutina 46, Vladikavkaz, 362025, Respublika Severnaya Osetiya – Alaniya, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-0078
e-mail: 54alina.levitskaya@gmail.com

Abstract

In the functional-semantic field of aspectuality in the modern Ossetian language, one of its most actionally expressive components is effective Aktionsarten: general effective and special effective. This paper studied verbs with the fæ- prefix, which marks, along with special effective Aktionsarten, verbs of general effective Aktionsarten. The most productive in the formation of the latter in the Ossetian language, just like in Russian, are telic verbs of certain lexico-semantic groups that form variants of the general effective Aktionsart. Verbs with the fæ- prefix have a richer palette of actional shades than verbs with other prefixes, deriving effective Aktionsarten from both telic and atelic verbs. In addition, prefixed forms with fæ- act as functional translation equivalents of Russian verbs containing the idea of effectiveness in certain aspectual and aspectual-temporal forms, namely: in the perfective subtype of the generalized-actual type of use of the imperfective aspect; in the total subtype of the concrete-actual type of use of the perfective aspect; in the present tense in the meaning of irrelevant abstract tense, in the descriptive and commenting subtypes, as well as in the meaning of habituality/usuality. A comparison of all types of use of Ossetian verbs with the fæ- prefix with their Russian translations and functional translation equivalents reveals a similar perception of the same facts of objective reality by speakers of the two languages. In addition, it allows us to establish differences in describing the progression and distribution of an effective action in time and, thereby, fill in some gaps in the comparative Ossetian-Russian aspectology.

Keywords

comparative aspectology, Ossetian language, Russian language, general effective Aktionsart, idioethnic components
Download (pdf, 0.6MB )

References

  1. Bondarko A.V. Printsipy funktsional’noy grammatiki i voprosy aspektologii [Principles of Functional Grammar and Issues of Aspectology]. Moscow, 2016. 208 p.
  2. Bondarko A.V. K problematike funktsional’no-semanticheskikh kategoriy (Glagol’nyy vid i “aspektual’nost’” v russkom yazyke) [On the Problems of Functional-Semantic Categories (Verbal Aspect and “Aspectuality” in the Russian Language)]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1967, no. 2, pp. 18–31.
  3. Bondarko A.V. Soderzhanie i tipy aspektual’nykh otnosheniy [The Content and Types of Aspectual Relationships]. Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki: Vvedenie. Aspektual’nost’. Vremennaya lokalizovannost’. Taksis [Theory of Functional Grammar: Introduction. Aspectuality. Temporal Localization. Taxis]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 40–63.
  4. Maslov Yu.S. Glagol’nyy vid v sovremennom bolgarskom literaturnom yazyke (znachenie i upotreblenie) [Verbal Aspect in the Modern Bulgarian Literary Language (Role and Usage)]. Bernshteyn S.B. (ed.). Voprosy grammatiki bolgarskogo literaturnogo yazyka. Moscow, 1959, pp. 157–312.
  5. Shelyakin M.A. Sposoby deystviya v pole limitativnosti [Lexical Aspects in the Field of Limitativeness]. Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki: Vvedenie. Aspektual’nost’. Vremennaya lokalizovannost’. Taksis [Theory of Functional Grammar: Introduction. Aspectuality. Temporal Localization. Taxis]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 63–85.
  6. Shelyakin M.A. Pristavochnye sposoby glagol’nogo deystviya i kategoriya glagol’nogo vida v sovremennom russkom yazyke: (K teorii funktsional’no-semanticheskoy kategorii aspektual’nosti) [Prefixal Aktionsarten and the Category of Verbal Aspect in Modern Russian: (On the Theory of the Functional-Semantic Category of Aspectuality): Diss.]. Leningrad, 1972. 566 p.
  7. Levitskaya A.A. O vidovoy nesootnositel’nosti v sovremennom osetinskom yazyke (vliyanie universal’nykh i idioetnicheskikh faktorov) [On Aspect Incongruity in Contemporary Ossetic (Influence of Universal and Idioethnic Factors)]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2007, no. 5, pp. 89–107.
  8. Abaev V.I. Grammaticheskiy ocherk osetinskogo yazyka [Essay on the Grammar of the Ossetian Language]. Osetinsko-russkiy slovar’ [Ossetian-Russian Dictionary]. Ordzhonikidze, 1962, pp. 194–662.
  9. Vydrin A.P. Gl. 8. Vzaimodeystvie glagol’nykh kategoriy v osetinskom yazyke [Ch. 8. Interaction of Verbal Categories in the Ossetian Language]. Khrakovskiy V.S., Mal’chukov A.L. (eds.). Ierarkhiya i vzaimodeystvie grammaticheskikh kategoriy glagola [Hierarchy and Interaction of Grammatical Categories of the Verb]. St. Petersburg, 2020, pp. 245–281. DOI: 10.30842/97856040926512020
  10. Bondarko A.V. Upotreblenie vidov [Use of Aspects]. Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1980, pp. 604–613.
  11. Levitskaya A.A. Features of the Aspectually-Temporal Potential of the Ossetian Verbs of Present Time in Comparison with Their Aspect-Temporary Russian Equivalents. Izvestiya YuFU. Filologicheskie nauki, 2022, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 81–94 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18522/1995-0640-2022-2-81-94
  12. Osetinsko-russkiy slovar’ [Ossetian-Russian Dictionary]. Ordzhonikidze, 1962. 662 p.
  13. Guriev T.A., Gutieva E.T. (comps.). Osetinsko-russkiy slovar’ [Ossetian-Russian Dictionary]. Vladikavkaz. Vol. 1, 2016. 679 p.; Vol. 2, 2017. 724 p.; Vol. 3, 2018. 720 p.; Vol. 4, 2019. 749 p.
  14. Maslov Yu.S. Kategoriya predel’nosti/nepredel’nosti glagol’nogo deystviya v gotskom yazyke [The Category of Telicity/Atelicity of Verbal Action in the Gothic Language]. Maslov Yu.S. Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologiya. Obshchee yazykoznanie [Selected Works: Aspectology. General Linguistics]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 249–266.
  15. Fadeyev A.A. Molodaya gvardiya [The Young Guard]. Fadeyev A.A. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 1972. 678 p.
  16. Fadeyev A.A. Ærygon gvardi. Vladikavkaz, 1953. 839 p.
  17. Maslov Yu.S. K osnovaniyam sopostavitel’noy aspektologii [On the Foundations of Comparative Aspectology]. Maslov Yu.S. Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologiya. Obshchee yazykoznanie [Selected Works: Aspectology. General Linguistics]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 305–364.
  18. Tsalieva A.A. Aspektual’nost’ v osetinskom yazyke, ee geneticheskie i areal’nye svyazi [Aspectuality in the Ossetian Language, Its Genetic and Geographical Links: Diss.]. Leningrad, 1983. 268 p.
  19. Tsabolov R.L. K istorii osetinskikh preverbov [On the History of Ossetian Preverbs]. Izvestiya Severo-Osetinskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta, 1957, vol. 19, pp. 319–354.
  20. Bondarko A.V. Vvedenie. Osnovaniya funktsional’noy grammatiki [Introduction. Foundations of Functional Grammar]. Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki: Vvedenie. Aspektual’nost’. Vremennaya lokalizovannost’. Taksis [Theory of Functional Grammar: Introduction. Aspectuality. Temporal Localization. Taxis]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 5–39.

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North