UDC

122

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V257

Authors

Zulfia A. Aksyutina
Omsk State Pedagogical University; ul. Partizanskaya 4А, Omsk, 644099, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-4673 e-mail: aksutina_zulfia@mail.ru

Abstract

The issue of addressing the phenomenon of sociality and its research are designed to help identify the characteristics of its typological, dynamic, structural and functional properties. The problems of sociality are most acutely actualized during crises, becoming the basis for studying society. The purpose of this article was to identify and describe the categorical series of sociality based on the generalization of its characteristics. In the course of the research, the author applied the categorical systems methodology. The theoretical analysis revealed no unified interpretation of the category of sociality. Sociality is often considered to be a result of social reality, a human trait, although there are attempts to consider sociality as a general category in relation to a specific category, namely, social reality. Sociality reflects a person’s ability to exist in society, to be its full member. Using the results of the theoretical analysis, generalizations and conclusions on understanding the category of sociality, the author developed a model of the structure and elements of the categorical series of sociality based on the categorical pendulum method. This model includes the following categories: society, social life, social reality, culture, historical development, politics, citizenship, sociability, exchange, connections, dependence and interdependence. The paper revealed sociality trends in the pessimal scenario of its development. Asociality, prosociality and antisociality, in contrast to sociality, manifest themselves to varying degrees. At the same time, the information society contributes to the formation of asociality, while prosociality is a consequence of the sociocultural penetration of alien values, and antisociality is seen as a consequence of alienation, including in upbringing. Further study into the pessimal tendencies of sociality will contribute to new scientific research aimed to fulfil preventive practice-oriented tasks of counteracting the indicated antagonistic types of sociality.

Keywords

categorical series, category, sociality, asociality, prosociality, antisociality

References

1. Dal’ V.I. Tolkovyy slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language]. Moscow, 1982. Vol. 4. 683 p.

2. Gubskiy E.F., Korableva G.V., Lutchenko V.A. (eds.). Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2002. 576 p.

3. Kemerov V.E. (ed.). Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar’ [Modern Dictionary of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2004. 863 p.

4. Mareev S.N. E.V. Ilyenkov. Moscow, 2005. 111 p. (in Russ.).

5. Momdzhyan K.Kh. Sotsial’naya filosofiya [Social Philosophy]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Encyclopaedia of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2010. Vol. 3, pp. 609–611.

6. Rozin V. Sociality of Modernity and the Phenomenon of the “Left”. Idei i idealy, 2020, vol. 12, no. 4, pt. 1, pp. 145–161 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.4.1-145-161

7. Rozin V.M. Reflection of the Foundations of an Interdisciplinary Study of Sociality. Voprosy filosofii, 2020, no. 1, pp. 64–73 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2020-1-64-73

8. Zorin V. (ed.). Evraziyskaya mudrost’ ot A do Ya: tolkovyy slovar’ [Eurasian Wisdom from A to Z: Explanatory Dictionary]. Almaty, 2002. 408 p. Available at: https://terme.ru/slovari/evraziiskaja-mudrost-ot-a-do-ja-tolkovyi-slovar. html (accessed: 2 July 2018).

9. Brushlinskiy A.V. (ed.). Sub”ekt i sotsial’naya kompetentnost’ lichnosti [The Subject and Social Competence of an Individual]. Moscow, 1995. 167 p.

10. Adulo T.I. Uyasnenie sushchnosti sotsial’nosti – klyuch k ponimaniyu global’nykh problem sovremennosti [Clarification of the Essence of Sociality Is the Key to Understanding the Global Problems of Modernity]. Filosofiya i gumanitarnye nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve, 2019, no. 4, pp. 12–43.

11. Aksyutina Z.A. Kharakteristika ponyatiya “sotsial’nost’” [Characteristic of the Concept “Sociality”]. SMAL”TA, 2020, no. 1, pp. 5–13.

12. Baklanova O.A. Sotsial’nost’ kak problema sotsial’noy filosofii [Sociality as a Problem of Social Philosophy]. Filosofiya prava, 2013, no. 5, pp. 62–65.

13. Zolotovitskiy R.A. Sotsial’naya real’nost’ [Social Reality]. Mazur I.I., Chumakov A.N. (eds.). Globalistika: entsiklopediya [Global Studies: Encyclopaedia]. Moscow, 2003, p. 939.

14. Slyusarev V.V., Khusyainov T.M. Proyavlenie sotsial’nosti, asotsial’nosti i antisotsial’nosti v virtual’nom prostranstve [The Development of Sociality, Asociality and Antisociality in the Virtual Space]. Sibirskiy filosofskiy zhurnal, 2018, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 114–124. DOI: 10.25205/2541-7517-2018-16-4-114-124

15. Filimonova O.F. Changes of Changes: Sociality and the Lack of Protection. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser.: Psikhologiya. Filosofiya. Pedagogika, 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 298–303 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2021-21-3-298-303