UDC

101.1+130.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V244

Authors

Nikolay I. Petev
Vladimir State University; ul. Gor’kogo 87, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-4400 e-mail: cyanideemo@mail.ru

Abstract

This paper analyses and compares two related phenomena, namely, game/play and mythology. Particular attention is given to the practical side of mythology, i.e. its implementation within the framework of rituals and other religious practices. First, the study investigates the correlation between mythology/ ritual and playing in terms of their historical transformations, in particular, in the aspect of dependence of the aforementioned religious elements on the game/play and their derivation from the game/play. Next, the author compares the following elements that correspond to the structure of the phenomenon of the game/ play and myth/cult actions: staging (illustrativeness, visualization), experience, dressing up (special role of costume and other attributes), space and time, participants (group), rules, language, and implementation channel. This paper investigates staging and experience. The purpose of the study is to identify and analyse the game/play aspects of mythology and ritual, as well as to establish their dependent or independent relation to the game/play. The main task is a comparative analysis that will determine whether the components of religious practice and playing are identical or just similar. To fulfil the purpose and the task, a number of methods are applied here: analysis and synthesis, comparative historical method, as well as religious, cultural, and psychological approaches. The generally accepted comparative religious method is not applicable in this case due to the specific nature of one of the objects under study (games), in contrast to the general comparative method. As a result of the research, the author comes to the following conclusions: 1) no phylogenetic or historical dependence of mythology and cult actions on the game/play was revealed; 2) ritual practices often resemble such a class of games as Mimicry and have tendencies similar to paidia and ludus; 3) the practical side of mythology is autonomous from the phenomenon of the game/play; 4) a special existential tension inherent in both the game/play and ritual practices was identified. However, the contents of these states are not identical, each having their own characteristics and peculiarities. The established contradictions do not imply ascent to some unity that would determine the dependence of the myth/ritual, making the latter just a derivative of playing (a form of the game/play).

Keywords

mythology, game/play, ritual, cult, shamanism, genesis of myth/ritual, genesis of game/play, staging, experience

References

1. Evangelopoulou O., Xinogalos S. MYTH TROUBLES: An Open-Source Educational Game in Scratch for Greek Mythology. Simul. Gaming, 2018, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–91. DOI: 10.1177/1046878117748175

2. Prasetio Y.L., Rambito S., Yudhistira A., Aulia S.F., Chowanda A. Teaching Social Critique to Adults with a Desktop Horror Myth Game. Procedia Comput. Sci., 2018, vol. 135, pp. 624–631. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.224

3. Artamonov D.S., Tikhonova S.V. Mythologization of Time in the Computer Games. 2022 Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS). St. Peterburg, 2022, pp. 125–128. DOI: 10.1109/comsds55328.2022.9769161

4. Xidakis I. Neomythology: A New Religious Mythology. Religions, 2022, vol. 13, no. 6. Art. no. 536. DOI: 10.3390/rel13060536

5. Otto R. Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. Breslau, 1917 (Russ. ed.: Otto R. Svyashchennoe: ob irratsional’nom v idee bozhestvennogo i ego sootnoshenii s ratsional’nym. St. Petersburg, 2008. 269 p.).

6. Huizinga J. Homo Ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur. Haarlem, 1938. 309 p. (Russ. ed.: Kheyzinga Y. Homo Ludens. Chelovek igrayushchiy: opyt opredeleniya igrovogo elementa kul’tury. St. Petersburg, 2011. 409 p.).

7. Eliade M. Le chamanisme et les techniques archaïques de l’extase. Paris, 1951. 447 p. (Russ. ed.: Eliade M. Shamanizm i arkhaicheskie tekhniki ekstaza. Moscow, 2015. 552 p.).

8. Guénon R. Krizis sovremennogo mira [The Crisis of the Modern World]. Moscow, 2008. 781 p.

9. Eliade M. Aspects du mythe. Paris, 1963. 246 p. (Russ. ed.: Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. Moscow, 2010. 251 p.).

10. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa [The Dialectics of Myth]. St. Petersburg, 2014. 316 p.

11. Jung K.G. Dusha i mif: Shest’ arkhetipov [Soul and Myth: Six Archetypes]. Moscow, 1997. 382 p.

12. James W. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York, 1902. 534 p. (Russ. ed.: Dzheyms U. Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta. Moscow, 1993. 432 p.).

13. Lévy-Bruhl L. Le surnaturel et la nature dans la mentalite primitive. Paris, 1931. 526 p. (Russ. ed.: Levi-Bryul’ L. Sverkh”estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. Moscow, 2015. 428 p.).

14. Barthes R. Mythologies. Paris, 1957. 233 p. (Russ. ed.: Bart R. Mifologii. Moscow, 2014. 351 p.).

15. Horwitz J. Shamanic Rites Seen from a Shamanic Perspective. Scr. Instituti Donneriani Abo., 1993, vol. 15, pp. 39–52. DOI: 10.30674/scripta.67205

16. van Löben Sels R. Shamanic Dimensions of Psychotherapy: Healing Through the Symbolic Process. London, 2019. 256 p.

17. England D. Soulfulness: The Marriage of Shamanic and Contemporary Psychology. London, 2017. 282 p.

18. Boyer P. Et l’homme créa les dieux: Comment expliquer la religion. Paris, 2001 (Russ. ed.: Buaye P. Ob”yasnyaya religiyu: priroda religioznogo myshleniya. Moscow, 2017. 496 p.).

19. Caillois R. Igry i lyudi: stat’i i esse po sotsiologii kul’tury [Man, Play and Games: Articles and Essays on the Sociology of Culture]. Moscow, 2007. 302 p.