UDC

7.01:130.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V232

Authors

Elena L. Yakovleva
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov; ul. Moskovskaya 42, Kazan, 420110, Respublika Tatarstan, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-604X 
e-mail: mifoigra@mail.ru

Abstract

Since the 20th century, along with the introduction of innovations, society has seen the processes of ignoring/destroying/transforming the values of previous historical stages of development. The changes that have been taking place are controversial, which makes us investigate them in order to preserve/restore the best of the past. The sphere of art and the phenomenon of the aura of a work of art were chosen as the object of this research. The paper applies the phenomenological, analytical and biographical methods. They help to describe the phenomenon of the aura of a work of art, identify some of the reasons for its origination, reveal the causes of its disappearance/transformation in modern times and consider the situation on the basis of the philosophical and aesthetic position and works of the representative of pop art Andy Warhol. It should be noted that the aura is something difficult to comprehend. Originating in the process of creating a work of art, it (immaterially) manifests itself when the work is being perceived. The origins of the aura are traced to the author: due to his/her individual characteristics and creative resources, the work of art acquires its uniqueness and philosophical poetry. In modern conditions, the artist’s use of devices (audio/video and document-reproduction/digital) and technologies, as well as constant replication of art lead to the transformation or disappearance of the aura. The latter fact was pointed out as early as in 1936 by W. Benjamin. To illustrate this phenomenon, the paper studies the works of Andy Warhol, who actively used technology and various devices to create them. As a result, his pieces of art are devoid of the aura, their perception by the audience is alienated. Moreover, Warhol himself, having deliberately turned into a man-machine, felt no joy from the process. A similar analysis can be used to study other forms of art and creators. The results of the analysis will help in constructing the concept of the aura of art and describing this phenomenon, in understanding the transformation of the aura in contemporary works, as well as in finding ways to bring the aura to life in the creative process.

Keywords

work of art, technique and technology, aura, reproduction of art through technique and technology, philosophical poetry, Andy Warhol, man-machine

References

1. Benjamin W. Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Taschenbuch, 1996 (Russ. ed.: Ben’yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. Moscow, 1996. 240 p.).
2. Krivtsun O.A. Aura proizvedeniya iskusstva: uznavaemoe i uskol’zayushchee [Aura of an Artwork: Recognizable and Eluding]. Chelovek, 2010, no. 2, pp. 95–106.
3. Krivtsun O.A. Aura proizvedeniya iskusstva: uznavaemoe i uskol’zayushchee [Aura of an Artwork: Recognizable and Eluding]. Chelovek, 2010, no. 3, pp. 107–119.
4. Drikker A.S., Makovetskiy E.A. Muzeynaya aura v tsifrovom formate [Museum Aura in a Digital Format]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie, 2020, no. 40, pp. 49–58. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/4
5. Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie [Self-Knowledge]. Moscow, 2021. 544 p.
6. Mazanenko O.M. Esteticheskie korrelyaty tvorcheskogo soznaniya [The Aesthetic Correlates of Creative Consciousness]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Filosofiya, 2019, no. 1, pp. 70–80.
7. Kruglov V.L. Khudozhestvenno-poeticheskie nachala kul’tury kak dispozitsii lichnosti [Artistic and Poetic Principles of Culture as Personal Dispositions]. Materiali za 8-a mezhdunarodna nauchna praktichna konferentsiya, “B”deshchite izsledvaniya”. T. 26. Filosofiya. Muzika i zhivot [Materials of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference, “Future Research”. Vol. 26. Philosophy. Music and Life]. Sofia, 2012, pp. 39−47. Available at: http://www.rusnauka.com/6_PNI_2012/Philosophia/4_102762.doc.htm (accessed: 1 July 2022).
8. Deleuze G. Logique du sens. Les Éditions de Minuit, 1969 (Russ. ed.: Delez Zh. Logika smysla. Moscow, 2011. 472 p.).
9. Baudrillard J. Sovershennoe prestuplenie. Zagovor iskusstva [The Perfect Crime. The Conspiracy of Art]. Moscow, 2019. 347 p.
10. Fromm E. Anatomie der menschlichen Destruktivität. Stuttgart, 1974. 473 p. (Russ. ed.: Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti. Moscow, 2009. 635 p.).
11. Benjamin W. Kratkaya istoriya fotografii [A Short History of Photography]. Moscow, 2015. 176 p.
12. Andy Warhol. Interview with Gene Swenson, Art News (1963). Available at: https://studylib.net/doc/8406529/andy-warhol-interview-with-gene-swenson--art-news--1963--aw (accessed: 1 July 2022).
13. Goldsmith K. (ed.). I’ll Be Your Mirror: The Selected Andy Warhol Interviews. New York, 427 p. (Russ. ed.: Goldsmit K. (ed.). Ya stanu tvoim zerkalom: izbrannye interv’yu Endi Uorkhola (1962–1987). Moscow, 2016. 431 p.).
14. Nuridsany M. Warhol. Moscow, 2019. 664 p. (in Russ.).
15. Rouillé A. La photographie: Entre document et art contemporain. Paris, 2005. 704 p. (Russ. ed.: Ruye A. Fotografiya. Mezhdu dokumentom i sovremennym iskusstvom. St. Petersburg, 2014. 712 p.).
16. Honnef K. Pop Art. Moscow, 2005. 96 p. (in Russ.).
17. Warhol A., Hackett P. POPism: The Warhol ‘60s. New York, 1980. 310 p. (Russ. ed.: Uorkhol E., Khekett P. Popizm: Uorkholovskie 60-e. St. Petersburg, 2012. 350 p.).
18. Baudrillard J. The Illusion of the End. Stanford, 1994. 123 p.
19. Rose B. Amerikanskaya zhivopis’. Dvadtsatyy vek [American Art Since 1900]. Bookking, 1995. 175 p.
20. Warhol A. The Philosophy of Andy Warhol (from A to B and Back Again). London, 1975. 241 p. (Russ. ed.: Uorkhol E. Filosofiya Endi Uorkhola (ot A k B i naoborot). Moscow, 2014. 268 p.).