CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

Nation and Civilization: The Classical Distinctions. P. 94–101

Версия для печати

Section: Philosophy

UDC

008+130.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V226

Authors

Ruslan Kh. Kasimov
Industrial University of Tyumen; ul. Volodarskogo 38, Tyumen, 625000, Russian Federation; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-3860 e-mail: rhkasimov@mail.ru

Abstract

The theory of nation and the theory of civilization attract considerable attention in the field of political and social sciences as well as in philosophy. However, the categories of nation and civilization are usually regarded separately, due to the fact that these two approaches have developed independently. Key thinkers of the theory of nation, as a rule, either ignore the category of civilization or give it only formal attention. The leading figures of the theory of civilization, on the contrary, could not but consider the distinction between nation and civilization. It should be noted that the concept of civilization could only be constructed proceeding from the category of nation, which had acquired a normative status in the social disciplines as early as in the 19th century. This article dwells on the distinction between nation and civilization in the works of the classical theorists of civilization, namely, O. Spengler, A. Toynbee and S. Huntington. In spite of the fact that all of the above authors make this differentiation, it is only in the works of Toynbee and Huntington that nation and civilization are presented as commensurable. Toynbee distinguishes nation and civilization as a part and as a whole, recognizing the subjectivity of civilization. Huntington proposes a hybrid differentiation that both preserves the qualities of the classical theory of civilization and includes elements of constructivism. The latter forms the basis for non-classical theories of civilization, such as G. Therborn’s concept. The non-classical approach allows us to draw not only a quantitative, but also a qualitative distinction between nations and civilizations: while nation-states arise as a result of a break with the past and develop within the framework of modernity, civilizations continue and restore the tradition.

Keywords

nation, civilization, nation-state, civilization-state, theory of civilization, O. Spengler, A. Toynbee, S. Huntington
Download (pdf, 0.5MB )

References

  1. Acharya A. The Myth of the “Civilization State”: Rising Powers and the Cultural Challenge to World Order. Ethics Int. Aff., 2020, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 139–156. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679420000192

  2. Coker C. The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge, 2019. 224 p.

  3. Maçães Β. The Attack of the Civilization-State. Noema, 15 June 2020. Available at: https://www.noemamag.com/the-attack-of-the-civilization-state/ (accessed: 7 October 2022).

  4. Duan L. From Nation-State to “New Civilization”: Li Dazhao in the May Fourth Period. Contemp. Chin. Thought, 2019, vol. 50, no. 1-2, pp. 26–38. DOI: 10.1080/10971467.2019.1755003

  5. Churin V.V. Etnos, natsiya, tsivilizatsiya kak kategorii sotsial’noy filosofii [Ethnic Group, Nation, Civilization as a Category of Social Philosophy]. Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filosofskie nauki, 2011, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 18−25.

  6. Sichkar’ T.V., Kirsanov K.A. Podkhody k ponimaniyu natsii, naroda, etnosa i tsivilizatsii [Approaches to Understanding the Nation, People, Ethnos and Civilization]. Mirovye tsivilizatsii, 2018, vol. 3, no. 1. Available at: https://wcj.world/PDF/06IAMZ118.pdf (accessed: 2 October 2022).

  7. Zevelev I.A. Budushchee Rossii: natsiya ili tsivilizatsiya? [Russia’s Future: Nation or Civilization?]. Rossiya v global’noy politike, 2019, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 176−193.

  8. Posadskiy A.V. Russkiy vopros: Rossiya kak natsiya i tsivilizatsiya v usloviyakh ideologicheskikh vyzovov sovremennosti [The Russian Question: Russia as a Nation and Civilization in the Conditions of Modern Ideological Challenges]. Metaparadigma. Al’manakh: bogoslovie, filosofiya, estestvoznanie, 2016, no. 9, pp. 89−141.

  9. Spengler O. Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. Munich, 1950 (Russ. ed.: Shpengler O. Zakat Zapadnogo mira: ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. Moscow, 2017. 1085 p.).

  10. Spengler O. Gody resheniy [The Hour of Decision]. Spengler O. Politicheskie proizvedeniya [Works on Politics]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 45−221.

  11. Toynbee A.J. A Study of History. Oxford University Press, 1946 (Russ. ed.: Toynbi A.Dzh. Issledovanie istorii: vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy. Moscow, 2009. 670 p.).

  12. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, 1996 (Russ. ed.: Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy. Moscow, 2007. 571 p.).

  13. Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford, 1983. 150 p.

  14. Therborn G. States, Nations, and Civilizations. Fudan J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 225–242. DOI: 10.1007/s40647-020-00307-1


Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North