UDC

141.5+122/129

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V209

Authors

Marina V. Nenasheva
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; ul. Smol’nyy Buyan 1, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-5638 e-mail: m.nenasheva@narfu.ru

Abstract

The modern world lives in the era of globalization. Problems arising in this process negatively affect the lives of individuals and the world community as a whole. In this regard, the search for answers to global challenges becomes urgent. The article demonstrates that a significant contribution to the understanding of global processes was made by the Club of Rome, an international organization that offered various solutions to world problems. However, it was not until the early 21st century that science came to the understanding that remedies to global crises should be sought in the sphere of human existence. Therefore, the author turned to the study of the phenomenon of human and social resilience as a possible response to the current global challenges. The article presents a detailed analysis of the phenomenon of personal resilience in existential philosophy and psychology, as well as identifies external and internal factors that determine the resilience of a person and society in global crises. It is shown that despite the wide range of definitions of individual resilience, there is no clarity as to what is meant by social resilience and how communities can develop such resilience in practice. Based on scientific research on this topic, it is concluded that the internal resource of communities is social ties and interaction that form their resilience in times of crisis. The results of this study can be used to find solutions to global challenges and ways to manage them.

Keywords

globalization, global challenges, global crisis, social resilience, individual resilience

References

1. Ivanov O.B. Global’nye riski i novye vyzovy chelovecheskoy tsivilizatsii [Global Risks and New Challenges ofHum an Civilization]. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika, 2020, no. 2, pp. 7–20. DOI: 10.24411/2071-6435-2020-10009

2. Kostenko O.N., Plastunenko N.N., Timoshenko N.V. Global’nye ekonomicheskie vyzovy i perspektivy razvitiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki [Global Economic Challenges and Development Prospects for Russian Economy]. Chelovek. Sotsium. Obshchestvo, 2022, no. 1, pp. 43–46.

3. Kholikov I. Rasprostranenie epidemiy, pandemiy i massovykh zabolevaniy kak global’nyy vyzov sovremennosti [The Spread of Epidemics, Pandemics, and Mass Diseases as a Contemporary Global Challenge]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, 2020, no. 2, pp. 27–40. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2020-2-27-40

4. Veber A.B. Chelovechestvo pered global’nym ekologicheskim vyzovom [Mankind Facing a Global Environmental Challenge]. Vek globalizatsii, 2011, no. 1, pp. 110–121.

5. Warren B., Burton N. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York, 1985. 244 p.

6. Cascio J. Facing the Age of Chaos. Available at: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaosb00687b1f51d (accessed: 16 April 2022).

7. Belkina G.L. (ed.). Chelovek v global’nom mire: riski i perspektivy [Human in the Global World: Risks and Prospects]. Moscow, 2021. 368 p.

8. Il’in I.V., Shestova T.V. Globalistika i global’nye issledovaniya [Globalistics and Global Studies]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. XXVII. Globalistika i geopolitika, 2015, no. 1/2, pp. 66–76.

9. Toynbee A.J. Postizhenie istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow, 2002. 565 p.

10. Leybin V.M. Rimskiy klub: khronika dokladov [The Club of Rome: Brief Reports]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 1997, no. 6, pp. 204–221.

11. Nekhamkin V.A. Osnovnye podkhody k resheniyu global’nykh problem: vozmozhnosti i predely [Basic Approaches to the Solution of Global Problems: Possibilities and Limits]. Sotsium i vlast’, 2014, no. 4, pp. 13–17.

12. Peccei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva [The Human Quality]. Moscow, 1985. 311 p.

13. Frolov I.T. Perspektivy cheloveka. Opyt kompleksnoy postanovki problemy, diskussii, obobshcheniya [Prospects for the Human. Experience of a Comprehensive Formulation of the Problem, Discussions, Generalizations]. Moscow, 1983. 350 p.

14. Tillich P. Muzhestvo byt’ [The Courage to Be]. Tilliсh P. Izbrannoe: Teologiya kul’tury [Selected Works: Theology of Culture]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 7–131.

15. May R. Man’s Search for Himself. New York, 1953. 281 p. (Russ. ed.: Mey R. Chelovek v poiskakh sebya. Moscow, 2013. 223 p.).

16. May R. The Courage to Create. New York, 1975. 143 p. (Russ. ed.: Mey R. Muzhestvo tvorit’. St. Petersburg, 2020. 160 p.).

17. Frankl V.E. The Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. New York, 1988. 198 p. (Russ. ed.: Frankl V. Volya k smyslu. Moscow, 2018. 228 p.).

18. Maddi S.R. Smysloobrazovanie v protsesse prinyatiya reshenii [Creating Meaning Through Making Decision]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 2005, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 87–101.

19. Grishina N.V. Ekzistentsial’nye problemy cheloveka kak zhiznennyy vyzov [Existential Human Problems as Ontological Challenge]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika, 2011, no. 4, pp. 109–116.

20. Korezin A.S., Murashov S.B. Rezil’entnost’ sotsial’nykh sistem: sushchnost’ kontsepta i ego primenimost’ na raznykh urovnyakh sotsiuma [Resilience of Social Systems: The Essence of the Concept and Its Applicability at Different Levels of Society]. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsial’nykh i marketingovykh issledovaniy, 2021, no. 1, pp. 17–22. DOI: 10.51692/1994-3776_2021_1_17

21. Selivanova O.A., Bystrova N.V., Derecha I.I., Mamontova T.S., Panfilova O.V. Studying the Phenomenon of Resilience: Problems and Prospects. World Sci. Pedagog. Psychol., 2020, vol. 8, no. 3 (in Russ.). Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/04PSMN320.pdf (accessed: 3 March 2022).

22. Robertson T., Docherty P., Millar F., Ruck A., Engstrom S. Theory and Practice of Building Community Resilience to Extreme Events. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 2021, vol. 59. Art. no. 102253. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102253

23. Fukuyama F. Sotsial’nyy kapital [Social Capital]. Harrison L., Huntington S. (eds.). Kul’tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu [ Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress]. Moscow, 2002, pp. 129–148.

24. Bourdieu P. Formy kapitala [The Forms of Capital]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 2002, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 60–74. DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2002-5-60-74

25. Putnam R. Social Capital and Public Affairs. Bull. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 1994, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 5−19. Available at: https://www.benjaminjameswaddell.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/putnam-social-capital-and-public-affairs.pdf (accessed: 18 March 2022).