CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

The “Mystery” of Kierkegaard’s Pseudonyms. P. 106–112

Версия для печати

Section: Philosophy

UDC

1(091):130.3

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V200

Authors

Nikolay B. Tetenkov
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
prosp. Lomonosova 4, Arkhangelsk, 163006, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-7419 e-mail: tenibo@yandex.ru

Abstract

Unriddling S. Kierkegaard’s pseudonyms is important for interpretation of his philosophical views. That is why the issue of his pseudonyms remains one of the most important problems for historians of philosophy and commentators on Kierkegaard’s works. This paper analyses various points of view on the reasons for Kierkegaard’s use of pseudonyms in his philosophical works. Among the opinions of various philosophers presented in the article, key hypotheses can be distinguished viewing pseudonyms as the following: literary characters; Kierkegaard’s experiment; a search for self-identification; understanding the past; an alternative to Hegel’s The Phenomenology of Spirit; alternative forms of human existence; roles played by S. Kierkegaard, who is also the author of these plays; demonstration of representative figures showing the boundaries of forms of human existence; a way to overcome loneliness; means of indirect communication; dissociation of Kierkegaard’s personality. The author believes that the concept of conceptual persona (or character) used by Deleuze and F. Guattari allows us to reveal the “secret” of Kierkegaard’s pseudonyms, since this concept demonstrates the complexity and multidimensionality of pseudonyms. Applying the concept of conceptual persona is relevant since pseudonyms have the same properties as conceptual personae: 1) like conceptual personae, pseudonyms are autonomous from their creator and express their own worldview; 2) dialogism, intrinsic to them, allows them to reveal through dialogue the idea embodied in a pseudonym; 3) among the pseudonyms there are no sympathetic pseudonyms expressing the author’s point of view or antipathetic pseudonyms opposing the author; 4) like conceptual personae, pseudonyms form a plane of immanence; 5) pseudonyms are not identical to a social role or the concept of literary character.

Keywords

pseudonym, conceptual persona, Kierkegaard’s pseudonyms, indirect communication, Deleuze, Kierkegaard, Adorno, Fеnger
Download (pdf, 0.5MB )

References

  1. Gorkin A.P. (ed.). Literatura i yazyk. Sovremennaya illyustrirovannaya entsiklopediya [Literature and Language. Modern Illustrated Encyclopaedia]. Moscow, 2006. 984 p.
  2. Lowrie W. A Short Life of Kierkegaard. Princeton, 1942. 315 p.
  3. Rohde P.P. Sören Kierkegaard: mit Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Rowohlt, 1995 (Russ. ed.: Rode P.
  4. Seren Kirkegor, sam svidetel’stvuyushchiy o sebe i o svoey zhizni. Chelyabinsk, 1998. 429 p.).
  5. Bibikhin V.V. K’erkegor i Gogol’ [Kierkegaard and Gogol]. Mir K’erkegora: russkie i datskie interpretatsii tvorchestva Serena K’erkegora [The World of Kierkegaard: Russian and Danish Interpretations of Søren Kierkegaard’s Works]. Moscow, 1994, pp. 82–90.
  6. Dru A. (ed.). The Journals of Kierkegaard 1834–1854. London, 1960. 254 p.
  7. Taylor M.C. Journeys to Selfhood: Hegel and Kierkegaard. Berkley, 1980. 298 p.
  8. Fenger H. Kierkegaard, the Myths and Their Origins: Studies in the Kierkegaardian Papers and Letters. New Haven, 1980. 233 p.
  9. Adorno T.W. Kierkegaard: Konstruktion des Ästhetischen: mit einer Beilage. Frankfurt am Main, 1962. 294 p.
  10. Bykhovskiy B.E. Kierkegaard. Moscow, 1972. 238 p. (in Russ.).
  11. Thust M. Sören Kierkegaard, der Dichter des Religiösen: Grundlagen eines Systems der Subjektivität. Munich, 1931. 619 p.
  12. Thompson J. The Lonely Labyrinth: Kierkegaard’s Pseudonymous Works. Carbondale, 1967. 242 p.
  13. Heiss R. Die grossen Dialektiker des 19. Jahrhunderts: Hegel, Kierkegaard, Marx. Cologne, 1963. 437 p.
  14. Le Blanc C. Kierkegaard. Paris, 1998. 140 p. (Russ. ed.: Blan Sh. le. K’erkegor. Moscow, 2021. 256 p.).
  15. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Paris, 1991. 206 p. (Russ. ed.: Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? Moscow, 1998. 288 p.).
  16. Tetenkov N.B., Lashov V.V. Kontseptual’nye personazhi S. K’erkegora [S. Kierkegaard’s Conceptual Characters]. Moscow, 2012. 360 p.

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North