UDC

94(47).05/08:130.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V193

Authors

Nataliya E. Mazalova
Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography, Russian Academy of Sciences;
Universitetskaya nab. 3, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-4506 e-mail: mazalova.nataliya@mail.ru

Abstract

Petersburg mythology reflects the perception of the city by its residents and their experience of it. This article considers Petersburg mythology as a replica of the “Petersburg text of Russian literature”. The author examines the phenomena characteristic of contemporary Petersburg mythology of the postmodern period: indeterminacy, free quotation, fragmentation, hybridization, “little history”, etc. Further, the paper analyses the meanings that Petersburg dwellers attach to Fyodor Dostoevsky’s famous expression “Petersburg is the most intentional town in the world”. One of the main features of postmodern thinking is manifested in the ideas about St. Petersburg, when various sources – first of all, literary, but also historical and architectural – make up contemporary Petersburg mythology. For this reason, the author chose the structural-typological method: comparing new mythological motifs with archaic and literary ones. Petersburg dwellers assign both positive (something thought out beforehand, an idea, a plan) and negative (something impetuous, a mistake, a crime) to the phrase “intentional Petersburg”. The author analyses the relationship between the concept of intentional town and the main myths of St. Petersburg: the creation myth and the eschatological myth, which are inseparable. Ideas about the intentionality of St. Petersburg are also associated with utopian ideas: creation at the will of an autocrat of an ideal city out of chaos, on swamp, but according to the rules of regular European urban planning. The author concludes that studying the concept of “intentional Petersburg” is relevant at present due to the following: the city’s creation and subsequent existence serve as a potential for an “intentional” impulse for the development of not only St. Petersburg, but of Russia as a whole.

Keywords

intentional Petersburg, Petersburg mythology, postmodernism, features of postmodern thinking, creation myth, eschatological myth, Peter I

References

1. Lur’e L. Predumyshlennyy gorod [An Intentional Town]. Lur’e L.Ya. Peterburg Dostoevskogo. Istoricheskiy putevoditel’ [Dostoevsky’s Petersburg: A Historical Guide]. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 6–35.
2. Toporov V.N. Peterburgskiy tekst [Petersburg Text]. Moscow, 2009. 820 p.
3. Bocharov S.G. Peterburgskiy peyzazh: kamen’, voda, chelovek [Petersburg Landscape: Stone, Water, Human]. Novyy mir, 2003, no. 10, pp. 134–141.
4. Bystrov N.L., Polyakova I.G. Peterburg kak utopiya: filosofsko-semioticheskiy etyud [St. Petersburg as a Utopia: A Philosophical and Semiotic Study]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury, 2004, no. 29, pp. 43–51.
5. Faybusovich E.L. Tebe spoyu zadushevnuyu pesnyu svoyu [I Will Sing My Heartfelt Song to You]. Geografiya, 2003, no. 20. Available at: https://geo.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200302003 (accessed: 20 February 2022).
6. Hassan I. The Culture of Postmodernism. Theory Cult. Soc., 1985, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 119–132.
7. Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford, 1989. 378 p. (Russ. ed.: Kharvi D. Sostoyanie postmoderna: Issledovanie istokov kul’turnykh izmeneniy. Moscow, 2021. 576 p.).
8. Caillois R. Le Mythe et l’Homme. Paris, 1994. 188 p. (Russ. ed.: Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral’noe. Moscow, 2003. 296 p.).
9. Toporov V.N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Research into the Poetics of Myth]. Moscow, 1995. 624 p.
10. Dostoevsky F.M. Zapiski iz podpol’ya [Notes from Underground]. Dostoevsky F.M. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 4. Leningrad, 1989, pp. 452–550.
11. Mazur-Matusevich E. Peterburg kak aziatskiy gorod [St. Petersburg as an Asian City]. Elektronnyy filosovskiy zhurnal. Vox / Golos, 2013, no. 14, pp. 1–18. Available at: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/219/223 (accessed: 25 March 2022).
12. Jangfeldt B. Ot varyagov do Nobelya. Shvedy na beregakh Nevy [From Varangians to Nobel: Swedes on the Banks of the Neva River]. Moscow, 2010. 392 p.
13. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1963. 900 p.
14. Toporov V.N. Khaos pervobytnyy [Primordial Chaos]. Tokarev S.A. (ed.). Mify narodov mira [Myths of the World]. Moscow, 1997. Vol. 2. K – Ya, pp. 585–586.
15. Foucault M. Les Mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris, 1966, 405 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. St. Petersburg, 1994. 405 p.
16. Deleuze G. Logika smysla [The Logic of Sense]. Foucault M. Theatrum philosophicum. Moscow, 1998. 480 p.
17. Brokgauz F.A., Efron I.A. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. T. XXXIVA (68). Uglerod – Usilie [Encyclopaedic Dictionary. Vol. XXXIVA (68). Nitrogen – Effort]. St. Petersburg, 1902. 960 p.
18. Dostoevsky F.M. Podrostok [The Adolescent]. Dostoevsky F.M. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 8. Leningrad, 1990, pp. 139–692.
19. Wierzbicka A. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Poznanie [Language. Culture. Cognition]. Moscow, 1996. 412 p.