UDC

94(470):327.5

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V164

Authors

Vladimir Yu. Luk’yanov
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation; ul. Bol’shaya Morskaya 67, St. Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-1733
e-mail: Volodya.luckyanov2017@yandex.ru

Abstract

This article analyses the problems of the рost-Soviet space as the most important factors affecting both Russia–West (US–Russia in the first place) relations and global geopolitical processes. The development of the approaches of Russia and the West to the former Soviet republics during the 1990s and 2020s is analysed. The evolution of Russia’s foreign policy in the post-Soviet space is demonstrated: from uncertainty during the 1990s to a tough, forceful defence of the country’s geopolitical interests in the region in the 2000s – 2020s. Further, key stages of Russia’s foreign policy are considered: the foundation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization and Eurasian Economic Union, the Russo-Georgian War of 2008, and the accession of Crimea to Russia in 2014. In addition, the main concepts and projects of the West are analysed here, i.e. Z. Brzeziński’s concept of geopolitical pluralism, A. Lake’s democratic enlargement, the Eastern Partnership project, and NATO’s eastward expansion. Moreover, the paper demonstrates the gradual deterioration of Russia–West relations in the post-Soviet space, the latter being transformed into a region of relentless rivalry between the two parties. The author concludes that relations between Russia and the West in the post-Soviet space have practically reached a dead end. Both Russia and the West have adopted a position of deliberate denial and condemnation of steps taken by the opposing side. In conclusion, the author attempts to forecast the development of the situation in the post-Soviet space and suggests ways to solve the existing problems.

Keywords

post-Soviet space, Russia–West opposition, geopolitical pluralism, democratic enlargement, NATO’s expansion, Eastern Partnership, Collective Security Treaty Organization, reset policy

References

1. Agreement on Measures to Ensure the Security of the Russian Federation and Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization: Draft. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 17 December 2021. Available at: https://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790803/ (accessed: 9 January 2022) (in Russ.).

2. Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Dekabr’ 1992 g. [Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. December 1992]. Shakleina T.A. (ed.). Vneshnyaya politika i bezopasnost’ sovremennoy Rossii. 1991–2002. T. IV. Dokumenty [Foreign Policy and Security of Modern Russia. 1991–2002. Vol. 4. Documents]. Moscow, 2002, pp. 19–50.

3. Putin Said That the Post-Soviet States Are Gradually Overcoming the Fears of the Revival of the USSR. TASS, 19 April 2020. Available at: http://www.tass.ru/politika/8281131 (accessed: 11 September 2021) (in Russ.).

4. Putin Urged Not to Interfere in the Affairs of the Post-Soviet States. RIA NOVOSTI, 22 October 2020. Available at: http://www.ria.ru/20201022/vmeshatelstvo-1581074895.html (accessed: 10 September 2021) (in Russ.).

5. Putin: The Situation in the Post-Soviet Space Is Our Foreign Policy Priority. ROSBALT, 7 August 2020. Available at: http://www.rosbalt.ru/russia/2020/08/07/1857587.html (accessed: 14 September 2021) (in Russ.).

6. Pikekatlet N. Putin zayavil o planakh Zapada pomeshat’ rostu vliyaniya RF na postsovetskom prostranstve [Putin Announced the Plans of the West to Impede Russia’s Growing Influence in the Post-Soviet Space]. Gazeta.Ru, 14 February 2021. Available at: http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2021/02/14/n_15617822.shtml (accessed: 11 September 2021).

7. Arbatova N. The CIS Factor in Russia–West Relations: Origins of Conflict. World Eсon. Int. Relat., 2018, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 77–87 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-8-77-87

8. Arbatova N. Three Dimensions of the Post-Soviet “Frozen” Conflicts. World Eсon. Int. Relat., 2019, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 88–100 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-5-88-100

9. Markedonov S.M. Ukrainskiy krizis: vozdeystvie na postsovetskie konflikty [The Ukrainian Crisis: Impact on the Post-Soviet Conflicts]. Postsovetskie issledovaniya, 2019, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 951–962.

10. Brzeziński Z. The Premature Partnership. Russian Archipelago: Network Project of the “Russian World”. Available at: http://www.archipelag.ru/authors/brzezinski/?library=430 (accessed: 21 September 2021) (in Russ.).

11. Lake A. Novaya strategiya SShA: ot “sderzhivaniya” k “rasshireniyu” [New US Strategy: From Containment to Enlargement]. SShA: ekonomika, politika, ideologiya, 1994, no. 3, pp. 29–38.

12. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. The White House. February 1995. Available at: https://archive.org/details/ ANationalSecurityStrategyof EngagementandEnlargementpage/n1/ mode/2up (accessed: 21 September 2021).

13. Eastern Partnership. European Union External Action Service. 19 October 2016. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_ru/30602/Vostochnoe%20partnerstvo (accessed: 19 September 2021) (in Russ.).

14. Shcherbak I.N. Problema Nagornogo Karabakha v fokuse antikrizisnoy diplomatii ES [Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict in the Center of the EU Crisis Diplomacy]. Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN, 2020, no. 5, pp. 60–67. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran520206067

15. Putin Called NATO Expansion a Potential Threat. RIA NOVOSTI, 3 December 2019. Available at: http://www.ria.ru/20191203/1561916284.html (accessed: 11 October 2021) (in Russ.).

16. NATO’s Expansion to the East Is of Practical Importance for Russia – Putin. BELTA – Novosti Belarusi, 10 June 2021. Available at: https://www.belta.by/world/view/rasshirenie-nato-na-vostok-imeet-prakticheskoe-znachenie-dlja-rossiiputin-445288-2021 (accessed: 11 October 2021) (in Russ.).

17. Sergunin A.A. “Vostochnoe partnerstvo”: vyzov rossiyskoy diplomatii v Vostochnoy Evrope [Eastern Partnership: A Challenge to Russian Diplomacy in Eastern Europe]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2010, no. 1, pp. 205–210.

18. Lavrov Spoke About the EU Initiative Aimed to Separate Neighboring Countries from Russia. Interfax, 18 December 2019. Available at: http://www.interfax.ru/world/688394 (accessed: 9 November 2021) (in Russ.).

19. Manoylo A.V. Tsvetnye revolyutsii i problemy demontazha politicheskikh rezhimov v menyayushchemsya mire [Color Revolutions and Problems of Dismantling of Political Regimes in a Changing World]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta, 2014, no. 2, pp. 1–14.

20. Tsvetkova N.A. Diskurs “tsvetnykh revolyutsiy” [Discourse of Color Revolutions]. Postsovetskie issledovaniya, 2019, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 940–950.

21. Maksimova E.N. Predposylki “tsvetnykh revolyutsiy”: sravnitel’nyy analiz [Prerequisites for Color Revolutions: Comparative Analysis]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12: Politicheskie nauki, 2019, no. 2, pp. 24–36.

22. The UN Does Not Recognize Accession of Crimea to Russia. BBC News. Russian Service, 27 March 2014. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/international/2014/03/140327_un_crimea_russia_referendum_illegal (accessed: 18 September 2021) (in Russ.).

23. Lavrov: NATO’s Maneuvers in the Black Sea Were a Deliberate Provocation. Federal’noe agentstvo novostey, 18 November 2021. Available at: http://www.riafan.ru/1556822-lavrov-manevry-nato-v-chernom-more-stalisoznatelnoi-provokaciei (accessed: 20 September 2021) (in Russ.).

24. “We Have Serious Problems”. The Maneuvers of the Russian Army Puzzled Americans. RIA NOVOSTI, 11 August 2021. Available at: http://www.ria.ru/20210811/amerikantsy-1745355424.html (accessed: 24 September 2021) (in Russ.).

25. Statement by President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, and President of the Russian Federation. Presidential Administration of Russia. 10 November 2020. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64384 (accessed: 22 September 2021) (in Russ.).

26. Kazennov S.Yu., Kumachev V.N., Koroleva E.M. Postsovetskoe prostranstvo i natsional’naya bezopasnost’ RF: zadachi perezagruzki [Post-Soviet Space and National Security of the Russian Federation: Tasks of the Reset]. Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya [Russia: Trends and Development Prospects]. Moscow, 2021. Iss. 16, pt. 1, pp. 147–151.

27. US National Security Strategy 2010. Russian Legal Portal: Pashkov’s Library. Available at: http://www.constitutions.ru/?p=5602 (accessed: 11 January 2022) (in Russ.).

28. Trump on Foreign Policy. The National Interest, 27 April 2016. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/trump-foreign-policy-15960 (accessed: 6 January 2022).

29. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf (accessed: 7 January 2022).

30. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. March 2021. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf (accessed: 8 January 2022).

31. A Foreign Policy for the American People. Available at: https://www.state.gov/a-foreign-policy-for-the-americanpeople/(accessed: 8 January 2022).

32. Shmelev B.A. Sotsial’no-politicheskaya turbulentnost’ na postsovetskom prostranstve: prichiny i posledstviya [Social and Political Turbulence in the Post-Soviet Space: Causes and Consequences]. Rossiya i sovremennyy mir, 2021, no. 4, pp. 85–100. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2021.04.04