UDC

115.4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V120

Authors

Rail’ R. Gazizov
Bashkir State University; ul. Zaki Validi 32, Ufa, 450000, Respublika Bashkortostan, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-8559 e-mail: rael888@mail.ru

Aydar T. Kayumov
Moscow State Linguistic University; ul. Ostozhenka 38, str. 1, Moscow, 119034, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-488X e-mail: atkayum@gmail.com

Abstract

This article deals with the philosophical analysis of social memory in the conditions of the development of today’s information society. In the paper, the social and intellectual cross-sections of information space and time are investigated. These cross-sections are directly related to the analysis of society’s legal consciousness, which seems to, so to say, lag behind the reflections about information space and time. The authors note that social space and time are formed through achieving the unity of information space and time. This is largely facilitated by social memory, which in its essence is a culture, and culture is connected with self-awareness. Culture as memory – historical and moral, obtained through social practice – provides the practice of material and spiritual production. Social memory acts as a kind of qualitative indicator of the state of society and contributes to the transition of information into knowledge, whose elements are characterized by the intense nature of their interaction. This intensity is explained by the fact that knowledge, unlike information, stands guard over the past, protecting it from external attempts to present anything positive that had been as something that had never happened and make it disappear in the annals of time. Philosophy is related to the analysis of the ultimate grounds of information space and time, which increases the intensity of interaction between the elements of the social system. At the same time, social memory increases the degree of interaction between existing values. It should be noted that social memory is very important for further research on the functioning of information society. It is a prerequisite for social forecasting of the development of cultural and social relations. Social memory is a way of existence of knowledge as a form of realization of human creative potential.

For citation: Gazizov R.R., Kayumov A.T. Social Memory in the Light of the Study of Information Space and Time. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 93–99. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V120

Keywords

social memory, information space, information time, human culture, self-awareness, information product, information society

References

1. Fedotova V.G. Apatiya na Zapade i v Rossii [Apathy in the West and in Russia]. Voprosy filosofii, 2005, no. 3, pp. 3–19.
2. Khasanova L.R. Sotsial’naya pamyat’ natsii (sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz traditsiy bashkirskogo naroda) [Social Memory of the Nation (Socio-Philosophical Analysis of the Traditions of the Bashkirs): Diss.]. Ufa, 2000. 131 p.
3. Bloch E. Tübinger Einleitung in die Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main, 1963 (Russ. ed.: Blokh E. Tyubingenskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu. Yekaterinburg, 1997. 400 p.).
4. Mamardashvili M.K. Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii [Lectures on Ancient Philosophy]. St. Petersburg, 2014. 256 p.
5. Gorskiy D.P. (ed.). Filosofiya lyubvi [Philosophy of Love]. Pt. 1. Moscow, 1990. 510 p.
6. Solovyov V.S. Smysl lyubvi [The Meaning of Love]. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1988, pp. 493–547.
7. Soloveychik S. “Agu” and “Buka”. Novyy mir, 1985, no. 3, pp. 179–199 (in Russ.).
8. Gromyko N.V. Internet i postmodernizm – ikh znachenie dlya sovremennogo obrazovaniya [The Internet and Postmodernism: Their Importance for Education Today]. Voprosy filosofii, 2002, no. 2, pp. 175–180.
9. Man’kovskaya N.B. “Parizh so zmeyami” (Vvedenie v estetiku postmodernizma) [Paris with Serpents: An Introduction to Postmodern Aesthetics]. Moscow, 1995. 220 p.
10. Marx K. Tezisy o Feyerbakhe [Theses on Feuerbach]. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, 1955. vol. 3, pp. 1–4.
11. Khaziev V.S. Istiny bytiya i poznaniya (izbrannye sochineniya) [Truths of Being and Knowledge (Selected Works)]. Ufa, 2007. 287 p.
12. Galimov B.S., Vasil’eva I.G. Novye perspektivy filosofskogo issledovaniya problemy dukhovnogo razvitiya cheloveka [New Prospects for Philosophical Research into Human Spiritual Development]. Ufa, 2001. 284 p.
13. Gaydenko P.P. Proryv k transtsendentnomu: novaya ontologiya XX veka [A Breakthrough to the Transcendent: A New Ontology of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow, 1997. 495 p.
14. Gott V.S., Delokarov K.Kh. Marks i nekotorye filosofskie problemy nauki [Marx and Some Philosophical Problems of Science]. Filosofskie nauki, 1984, no. 4, pp. 3–11.