UDC

81’42:[81-116::811.111]

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V119

Authors

Marina A. Sukhomlinova
Southern Federal University; ul. Bol’shaya Sadovaya 105/42, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-1480 e-mail: sukhomlinovam@mail.ru

Abstract

The academic lecture is considered to be one of the basic genres of modern English-language academic discourse. The study of the compositional structure of the lecture text is extremely important, since a correctly arranged composition contributes to a better presentation of the topic by the lecturer and systemic learning of the material by the students. The purpose of this research was to identify the compositional features of the text of the English-language academic lecture. To achieve this goal, eight English-language lectures on the humanities were selected and carefully analysed. In the course of the analysis, phases of the lecture were singled out, the hierarchy of its elements was revealed, and the composition matrix of the lecture text was built. The main compositional elements of the lecture are as follows: the pre-text part (title complex), the text part (introduction, body, and conclusion) and the aftertext part (references and expression of gratitude for attention). As a result, the author proved that the lecture text has a matrix structure, whose elements are nonuniform, each being designed to perform its own specific function. The compositional-semantic structure of the lecture captures the movement from the “old” knowledge to the “new”. Further, English-language lectures demonstrate both strong and weak positions. This means that some elements in the text are more important than others. At the same time, the strong position does not have to be rigidly connected with the structure of the text. The following are regarded as strong positions: title of the lecture, names of its subsections, beginning and end of subsections, introductory and closing parts of the lecture, conclusions, semantic repetitions of key information, questions-and-answers part, and in-text references.

For citation: Sukhomlinova M.A. Peculiarities of the Compositional Structure of the Text of the English-Language Academic Lecture. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 83–92. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V119

Keywords

English-language academic lecture, compositional arrangement of the academic lecture, matrix of the academic lecture text, strong position of a text, text-forming means

References

1. Nagieva E.B. Sredstva dialogichnosti publichnoy lektsii v aspekte spetsifiki zhanra [The Dialogueness Means of Public Lecture in Terms of Genre Specificity]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, 2015, no. 4, pp. 80–87.
2. Burmakina N.G., Kulikova L.V. Akademicheskiy diskurs: Institutsional’nost’, stil’, zhanry [Academic Discourse: Institutionalism, Style, Genres]. Moscow, 2019. 200 p.
3. Yaakob S.A. Genre Analysis and Corpus Based Study of University Lecture Introductions. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The University of Birmingham. Birmingham, 2013. 316 p.
4. Živković B. A Corpus-Based Study of the Structure of University Lecture Introductions. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., 2014, vol. 5, no. 13. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n13p107
5. Thompson S.E. Text-Structuring Metadiscourse, Intonation and the Signalling of Organisation in Academic Lectures. J. Engl. Acad. Purp., 2003, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–20. DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-X
6. Nikolaev S.G., Sukhomlinova M.A. Syntactic Organization of an English Lecture: Discourse Specificity in Academic Communication. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. Future Academy, 2020. Vol. 92, pp. 3200–3207. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.05.425
7. Talanina A.A. The Logical and Compositional Organization of the Lecture (Based on a Lecture from M. Mamardashvili’s Course “Lectures on Proust”). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 6, pp. 72–81. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V065
8. Dronova G.E. Kommunikativnaya kategoriya “yasnost’ rechi” v zhanre lektsii [Communicative Category “Speech Clarity” in the Lecture Genre: Diss.]. Yekaterinburg, 2006. 165 p.
9. Sukhomlinova M.A. Transformatsiya zhanra angloyazychnoy akademicheskoy lektsii v usloviyakh tsifrovoy kommunikatsii [Transformation of the English-Language Academic Lecture Genre in the Conditions of Digital Communication]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2019, no. 6, pp. 172–178.
10. Sukhomlinova M.A. Sistemnye zhanrovo-stilisticheskie otnosheniya v tekste akademicheskoy lektsii (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Systemic Genre and Stylistic Relations in Academic Lecture Text (by the Material of the English Language)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2017, no. 5-2, pp. 144-148.
11. How to Prepare and Present a Lecture English Language Essay. November 2018. Available at: https://www.ukessays.com/essays/english-language/how-to-prepare-and-present-a-lecture-english-language-essay.php?vref=1 (accessed: 15 August 2018).
12. Cioffi-Revilla C. Science and Complexity in Foreign Policy: Insights from the Frontiers of Computational Social Science. 2009. Available at: https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/stas/series/154209.htm (accessed: 20 August 2016).
13. Lin L., Challapalli S. In Search of Utopium: The Elusive Metal. 2013. Available at: https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/stas/2013/215307.htm (accessed: 5 April 2016).
14. Goodenow M. A Global Health Paradigm for Defense, Development, and Diplomacy. 2013. Available at: https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/stas/series/212175.htm (accessed: 20 August 2016).
15. Learning to Teach, Teaching to Learn: A Handbook for NUS Teachers. Singapore, 2008. 200 p.
16. Burns K. The Jefferson Lecture. National Endowment for the Humanities. 2016. Available at: https://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/ken-burns-biography (accessed: 18 August 2016).
17. Bazhenova E.A. Kompozitsiya (teksta) [Composition (of the Text)]. Kozhina M.N. (ed.). Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Stylistic Encyclopaedic Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 168–173.
18. Nikolaev S.G. Fenomenologiya bilingvizma v tvorchestve russkikh poetov. Ch. I: Teoreticheskie osnovy izucheniya inoyazychiya v poezii [Phenomenology of Bilingualism in the Works of Russian Poets. Part I: Theoretical Foundations of the Study of Foreign Language in Poetry]. Rostov-on-Don, 2004. 176 p.
19. Skovorodnikov A.P. Pozitsionno-leksicheskiy povtor kak stilisticheskoe yavlenie [Positional Lexical Repetition as a Stylistic Phenomenon]. Filologicheskie nauki, 1984, no. 5, pp. 71–76.
20. Strel’tsova E.V. Sil’nye pozitsii khudozhestvennogo teksta: nachalo i konets proizvedeniya (na materiale proizvedeniy R. Dalya) [The Beginning and the End of a Fiction Text as Its Foregrounding Elements (Based on the Stories by R. Dahl)]. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–37.