UDC

81’373.612.2:82-1

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V104

Authors

Oksana D. Kolokol’nikova
Smolensk State University; ul. Przheval’skogo 4, Smolensk, 214000, Russian Federation; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-679X e-mail: oksana.kolokolnikova@gmail.com

Abstract

The study of the author’s individual style is an intensively developing area of modern linguistics. Currently, the author’s individual style is considered as a system characterized by both statics and dynamics. Metaphors are some of the most reliable markers of individual style, since they give an idea of the writer’s personality and mental worldview. This article analyses the individual style in the lyric poetry of Robert Bridges, an outstanding English poet of the late 19th – early 20th centuries. The obtained results made it possible to establish that the stable part of Bridges’ individual style is a set of concepts forming his conceptual sphere as well as the central opposition of his oeuvre: the microcosm–macrocosm opposition. The varying characteristics of Bridges’ individual style are the ranks of concepts, changes in which are associated with a shift in the focus of the author’s attention and transformation in his worldview. The quantitative changes in Bridges’ later lyric poems compared to the early ones include a growing share of negatively coloured vocabulary and number of substantive metaphors, as well as an increasing variety of metaphorization of certain concepts. The main trends in Bridges’ individual style transformation are the tendency towards compensation, manifesting itself in various aspects of metaphorization, and the tendency towards simplification and concretization. The analysis of the evolution of Bridges’ metaphorical system showed that at the initial stage of his writing, he is equally interested in both the inner world of a person and the outside world, while in his later lyric poems Bridges focuses on the outside world, in particular, society.

For citation: Kolokol’nikova O.D. Evolution of Robert Bridges’ Style Through the Lens of Metaphor. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 65–75. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V104

Keywords

Robert Bridges’ individual style, evolution of the individual style, author’s metaphor, author’s conceptual sphere, frequency core, target concept, source concept

References

1. Andreev V.S. Modelirovanie individual’nogo stilya amerikanskikh poetov-romantikov [Modeling of Individual Styles of American Romantic Poets]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2012, no. 10, pp. 47–52.
2. Andreev V.S. Korrelyatsiya kharakteristik v metaforicheskoy modeli [Correlation of Features in Metaphoric Model]. Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016, no. 2, pp. 86–94.
3. Nikolaeva T.V. Evolyutsiya individual’nogo stilya (na materiale metaforicheskoy sistemy Roberta Brauninga) [Individual Style Evolution (Based on the Material of Robert Browning’s Metaphorical System)]. Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, no. 2, pp. 190–205.
4. Efron B., Thisted R. Estimating the Number of Unseen Species: How Many Words Did Shakespeare Know? Biometrika, 1976, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 435–447.
5. Kestemont M., Moens S., Deploige J. Collaborative Authorship in the Twelfth Century: A Stylometric Study of Hildegard of Bingen and Guibert of Gembloux. Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit., 2015, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 199–224.
6. Akhmanova O.S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Moscow, 2010. 576 p.
7. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 2003. 276 p. (Russ. ed.: Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow, 2004. 256 p.).
8. Bridges R.S. Poetical Works of Robert Bridges: Excluding the Eight Dramas. London, 1913. 486 p.
9. Hamilton L.T. Robert Bridges: An Annotated Bibliography, 1873–1988. Newark, 1991. 243 p.
10. Pavlovich N.V. Yazyk obrazov: paradigmy obrazov v russkom poeticheskom yazyke [The Language of Images: Paradigms of Images in the Russian Poetic Language]. Moscow, 1995. 491 p.
11. Andreev V.S. Klassifikatsiya stikhotvornykh tekstov (na materiale liriki amerikanskikh poetov-romantikov) [Classification of Poetic Texts (Based on the Works of American Romantic Poets): Diss.]. Smolensk, 2002. 163 p.
12. Andreev V.S. Yazykovaya model’ razvitiya individual’nogo stilya (na materiale stikhotvornykh tekstov amerikanskikh poetov-romantikov) [Linguistic Model of Individual Style Development (Based on the Works of American Romantic Poets): Diss.]. Smolensk, 2012. 391 p.
13. Tishina A.E. Evolyutsiya metaforicheskoy modeli v obraznoy sisteme A.Ch. Suinberna [Evolution of the Metaphorical Model in A.C. Swinburne’s Figurative System: Diss.]. Smolensk, 2016. 230 p.
14. Popova V.V. Variativnost’ metaforicheskoy sistemy Roberta Sauti v sinkhronii i diakhronii [Variation of Robert Southey’s Metaphorical System in Synchrony and Diachrony: Diss.]. Smolensk, 2019. 230 p.
15. Nikolaeva T.V. Evolyutsiya individual’nogo stilya R. Brauninga [Evolution of R. Browning’s Individual Style: Diss.]. Smolensk, 2019. 155 p.