UDC

101+130.3

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V095

Authors

Aleksey E. Shishkin
Medical University “Reaviz”; ul. Chapaevskaya 227, Samara, 443001, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6684-2962 e-mail: ladomir12345@rambler.ru

Abstract

The transformation of value meanings in Russia under the influence of the socio- political technologies of “consciental warfare” took place several times. The first turmoil occurred during the reign of Prince Vladimir through change of religion (from Vedism to Judeo-Christianity) and replacement of Glagolitic script by Cyrillic alphabet. The second unrest was organized in the period of the Seven Boyars; the third, during the October Revolution, while the fourth began under President Yeltsin’s rule and continues to the present day. Vasily Klyuchevsky believed that the essence of the turmoil lies in the national rifts between “soil” and “civilization”. According to Vladimir Solovyov, the struggle between clan and state relations is the main content of the history of Russia. The essence of civilizational rifts lies in the contradiction between globalization and localization in the conditions of cyclic stages of human development, especially pronounced in an era of change, when the clash of cultures intensifies. Nowadays, we have an understanding of how ersatz values are intentionally implanted with the help of soft power, but in order to resist national and civilizational entropy, we must create sociopolitical technologies that ensure consistent security. According to the author, a balance of power in a society can be established through restoring and preserving traditional community values. For Jean Monnet, the communal approach involves gathering the entire humanity into a single fraternal family (the mondialist project) to restrain the power of the market. The “communard methodology” of I.P. Ivanov and A.V. Mudrik considers the communal way of life as a “social phenomenon”, “part of culture” and “national heritage”. This paper suggests constructs for transforming society in the context of communitarianism, where people are authorized to create their own social reality. The new communitarian self-developing system, as an original solution for long-term development of Russia, should become an obstacle to national and civilizational rifts, manifested in social instability and colour revolutions.
For citation: Shishkin A.E. Transformation of Values in the Context of National and Civilizational Rifts. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 130–140. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V095

Keywords

transitivity and transparency of values, terminal and instrumental values, transformation of values, communitarianism, mondialism, national rifts, civilizational rifts, consciental security

References

1. Kunde J. Unique Now...or Never: The Brand Is the Company Driver in the New Value Economy. Harlow, 2002. 352 p. (Russ. ed.: Kunde Y. Unikal’nost’ teper’… ili nikogda. Brend – dvizhushchaya sila kompanii v novoy ekonomike tsennostey. St. Petersburg, 2004. 350 p.).
2. Fedotova V.G. Khoroshee obshchestvo [Good Society]. Moscow, 2005. 544 p.
3. Sorokin P.A. Krizis nashego vremeni [The Crisis of Our Age]. Sorokin P.A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow, 1992, pp. 427–504.
4. Sorokin P.A. Sotsial’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika: Issledovanie izmeneniy v bol’shikh sistemakh iskusstva, istiny, etiki, prava i obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law, and Social Relations]. St. Petersburg, 2000. 1054 p.
5. Yachin S.E. Smysl i tsennosti. K kritike teorii tsennosti v sovremennoy filosofii [Sense and Values. On the Criticism of the Theory of Values in Modern Philosophy]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovatel’skoy kul’tury, 2016, no. 2, pp. 32–39.
6. Votintseva N.N. Spetsifika tsennostey i tsennostnogo soznaniya v transformiruyushchemsya obshchestve [Specificity of Values and Value Consciousness in a Transforming Society: Diss.]. Perm, 2008. 187 p.
7. Vyzhletsov G.P. Aksiologiya kul’tury na rubezhakh vekov [Axiology of Culture at the Turn of the Centuries]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovatel’skoy kul’tury, 2016, no. 2, pp. 15–26.
8. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values. New York, 1973. 438 p.
9. Vegas J.M. Tsennosti i vospitanie. Kritika nravstvennogo relyativizma [Values and Education. Criticism of Moral Relativism]. St. Petersburg, 2007. 225 p.
10. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality. New York, 1954. 411 p. (Russ. ed.: Maslou A.G. Motivatsiya i lichnost’. St. Petersburg, 1999. 230 p.).
11. Döring A. Philosophische Güterlehre: Untersuchungen über die Möglichkeit der Glückseligkeit und die wahre Triebfeder des sittlichen Handelns. Berlin, 1888. 438 p.
12. Ribot T. La Logique des sentiments. Paris, 1905. 200 p. (Russ. ed.: Ribo T. Logika chuvstv. St. Petersburg, 1905. 145 p.).
13. Rickert H. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen, 1910. 151 p. (Russ. ed.: Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture. Moscow, 1998. 193 p.).
14. Fomina Z.V. Chelovecheskaya dukhovnost’: bytie i tsennosti [Human Spirituality: Being and Values]. Saratov, 1997. 190 p.
15. Tugarinov V.P. O tsennostyakh zhizni i kul’tury [On the Values of Life and Culture]. Leningrad, 1960. 156 p.
16. Zdravomyslov A.G., Yadov V.A. Otnoshenie k trudu i tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti [Attitude Towards Labour and Value Orientations of a Person]. Sotsiologiya v SSSR [Sociology in the USSR]. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1965, pp. 189–208.
17. Solov’ev S.S. Transformatsiya tsennostey voennoy sluzhby [Transformation of Military Service Values]. Sotsis, 1996, no. 9, pp. 17–25.
18. Rozov N.S. Tsennosti v problemnom mire: filosofskie osnovaniya i sotsial’nye prilozheniya konstruktivnoy aksiologii [Values in a Problematic World: Philosophical Foundations and Social Applications of Constructive Axiology]. Novosibirsk, 1998. 292 p. Available at: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s01/z0001097/st000.shtml (accessed: 28 April 2014).
19. Kant I. Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh [Works in German and Russian]. Moscow, 1997. 248 p.
20. Drobnitskiy O.G. Mir ozhivshikh predmetov: problema tsennosti i marksistskaya filosofiya [The World of Objects Come Alive: The Problem of Value and Marxist Philosophy]. Moscow, 1967. 351 p.
21. Shokhin V.K. Filosofiya tsennostey i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl’ [The Philosophy of Values and Early Axiological Thought]. Moscow, 2006. 457 p.
22. Gorshkov M.K. Rossiyskoe obshchestvo v usloviyakh transformatsii (sotsiologicheskiy analiz) [Russian Society in the Context of Transformation (Sociological Analysis)]. Moscow, 2000. 384 p.
23. Zaslavskaya T.I., Kalugina Z.I. (eds.). Sotsial’naya traektoriya reformiruemoy Rossii. Issledovaniya Novosibirskoy ekonomiko-sotsiologicheskoy shkoly [The Social Trajectory of Russia in the Process of Reformation. Research of the Novosibirsk School of Economics and Sociology]. Novosibirsk, 1999. 736 p.
24. Imamichi T. Krizis morali i problemy metatekhniki [Moral Crisis and Metatechnical Problems]. Voprosy filosofii, 1995, no. 3, pp. 73–82.
25. Sharov A.V. Transformatsiya tsennostey v menyayushchemsya mire [Transformation of Values in a Changing World]. Vyzovy sovremennosti i otvetstvennost’ filosofa [Challenges of the Present Time and Philosopher’s Responsibility]. Bishkek, 2003, pp. 85–88.
26. Buzgalin A.V. (ed.). Ekonomika znaniy i innovatsiy: perspektivy Rossii [The Economy of Knowledge and Innovation: Prospects for Russia]. Moscow, 2007. 364 p.
27. Rozov M.A. Problema tsennostey i razvitie nauki [The Problem of Values and the Development of Science]. Nauka i tsennosti [Science and Values]. Novosibirsk, 1987, pp. 5–26.
28. Akhiezer A.C. Kak “otkryt’” zakrytoe obshchestvo [How to “Open” a Closed Society]. Moscow, 1997. 318 p.
29. Burlachuk V.F. Simvol i vlast’: Rol’ simvolicheskikh struktur v postroenii kartiny sotsial’nogo mira [Symbol and Power: The Role of Symbolic Structures in Forming a Social World View]. Kiev, 2002. 266 p.
30. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, 1990. 808 p.
31. Heidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat’i i vystupleniya [Being and Time: Articles and Speeches]. Moscow, 1993. 447 p.
32. Habermas J. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main, 1983. 207 p. (Khabermas Yu. Moral’noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deystvie. St. Petersburg, 2000. 377 p.).
33. Makeychik A.A. Aksiologiya [Axiology]. St. Petersburg, 2004. 130 p.
34. Baeva L.V. Tsennosti izmenyayushchegosya mira: ekzistentsial’naya aksiologiya istorii [Values of a Changing World: Existential Axiology of History]. Astrakhan, 2004. 275 p.
35. Zlobin N.S., Kelle V.Zh. (eds.). Tsennostnye aspekty razvitiya nauki [Value Aspects of the Development of Science]. Moscow, 1990. 292 p.
36. Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya tipy [Types of Civilizational Development]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Encyclopaedia of Philosophy]. Moscow, 2001. Vol. 4: T–Ya, pp. 330–332.
37. Suprun V.I. Tsennosti i sotsial’naya dinamika [Values and Social Dynamics]. Nauka i tsennosti [Science and Values]. Novosibirsk, 1987, pp. 162–163.
38. Tolstykh V.I. Global’nye vyzovy i poiski otveta: sotsiokul’turnyy aspekt [Global Challenges and Search for Answers: A Socio-Cultural Aspect]. Grani globalizatsii: trudnye voprosy sovremennogo razvitiya [Faces of Globalization: Difficult Issues of Modern Development]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 36–41.
39. Krokinskaya O.K. Tsennosti truda i obrazovaniya v molodezhnoy srede: esli razobrat’sya [Looking into the Values of Labour and Education Among Young People]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6: Filosofiya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya. Psikhologiya. Pravo, 1993, no. 2, pp. 49–55.