UDC

[94(73)092:327](98)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V085

Authors

Flera Kh. Sokolova
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; prosp. Lomonosova 2, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-6128 e-mail: f.sokolova@narfu.ru

Aleksandr E. Shaparov
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; prosp. Lomonosova 2, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0915-4730 e-mail: a.shaparov@narfu.ru

Abstract

The current international political agenda has seen a growing importance of the Arctic region, which in the last century remained on the periphery of world politics. The interest in the Arctic is clearly manifested in the global socio-political discourse, with national interests in this region being advanced not only by the Arctic states, but also by countries having no direct geographical connection with it. Based on the analysis of key strategic documents, this article presents the dynamics of the development of the US Arctic policy in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It is demonstrated that Barack Obama’s and Donald Trump’s Arctic policies were interconnected and had common grounds, including the following: protection of the country’s national interests in the region; environmental priorities and ensuring sustainable development of the region; participation of indigenous peoples in the decision-making process concerning their interests; development of international cooperation; freedom of navigation; responsible management of the Arctic under the leadership of the United States. However, according to the authors, Obama’s and Trump’s Arctic policies had two significant differences. Firstly, Obama viewed the Arctic as a territory of cooperation and dialogue, while Trump, as an area of rivalry and competition. Secondly, in Obama’s policy, the ecological component was more pronounced, while Trump primarily focused on the country’s economic interests. In general, the two presidents’ Arctic policies were in line with the corresponding foreign policies of the Democratic and Republican Parties. Thus, it can be predicted that Joe Biden’s Arctic policy will be a continuation of Obama’s policy
For citation: Sokolova F.Kh., Shaparov A.E. The Arctic Vector of US Foreign Policy: Dynamics of Development in the Late 20th – Early 21st Centuries. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 30–41. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V085

Keywords

international relations in the Arctic, US Arctic policy, US Arctic strategy, Barack Obama, Donald Trump

References

1. Lukin Yu.F. Mnogomernost’ prostranstva Arktiki [Multidimensionality of the Arctic Space]. Arkhangelsk, 2017. 250 p.
2. Arktika v fokuse sovremennoy geopolitiki [The Arctic in the Focus of Attention of Contemporary Geopolitics]. Moscow, 2015. 56 p.
3. Selin V.S., Skuf’ina T.P., Bashmakova E.P., Toropushina E.E. Sever i Arktika v novoy paradigme mirovogo razvitiya: aktual’nye problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy [The North and the Arctic in the New Paradigm of Global Development: Current Problems, Trends, Prospects]. Apatity, 2016. 420 p.
4. Zagorskiy A.V. (ed.). Arktika: zona mira i sotrudnichestva [The Arctic: A Zone of Peace and Cooperation]. Moscow, 2011. 195 p.
5. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. Arktika v mezhdunarodnoy politike: sotrudnichestvo ili sopernichestvo? [The Arctic in International Politics: Cooperation or Rivalry?]. Moscow, 2011. 194 p.
6. Shaparov A.E., Chuvashova N.I. Geopoliticheskaya situatsiya v Arktike: rezhim negativnoy bezopasnosti [The Geopolitical Situation in the Arctic: Negative Security Regime]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2015, no. 6, pp. 109–118. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2015.6.109
7. Perry C.M., Andersen B. New Strategic Dynamics in the Arctic Region. Washington, 2012. 192 p. Available at: http://www.ifpa.org/pdf/StrategicDynamicsArcticRegion.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
8. Keil K. The Arctic: A New Region of Conflict? The Case of Oil and Gas. Cooperation Confl., 2014, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 162–190. DOI: 10.1177/0010836713482555
9. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. Strategii inostrannykh gosudarstv v Arktike: obshchee i osobennoe [Foreign Countries’ Strategies in the Arctic: The Common and the Specific]. Arkticheskiy region: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [The Arctic Region: Problems of International Cooperation]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2013, pp. 112–144.
10. Heininen L. State of the Arctic Strategies and Policies – A Summary. Arctic Yearb., 2012. 46 p. Available at: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2012/Scholarly_Papers/1.Heininen.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
11. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. Arkticheskaya strategiya SShA i natsional’nye interesy Rossii [US Arctic Strategy and Russia’s National Interests]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’, 2012, no. 48, pp. 2–10.
12. Bergh K. The Arctic Policies of Canada and the United States: Domestic Motives and International Context. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security, 2012, no. 1, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/insight/SIPRIInsight1201.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
13. Lamy S.L. The U.S. Arctic Policy Agenda: The State Trumps Other Interests. Heininen L. (ed.). Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate. London, 2016, pp. 77–98.
14. Huebert R. United States Arctic Policy: The Reluctant Arctic Power. SPP Briefing Papers, 2002, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–27. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292257748_United_States_Arctic_Policy_The_Reluctant_Arctic_Power (accessed: 3 January 2021).
15. United States Policy on the Arctic and Antarctic Regions. Presidential Decision Directive / NSC-26. June 9, 1994. Available at: https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd/pdd-26.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
16. Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle. USGS Fact Sheet. 2008. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
17. National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive NSPD-66/HSPD-25. January 9, 2009. Available at: https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm (accessed: 3 January 2021).
18. U.S. Navy Arctic Roadmap. November 10, 2009. Available at: https://climateandsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/us-navy-arctic-roadmap-nov-2009.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
19. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. Washington. May 10, 2013. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
20. Implementation Plan for the National Strategy for the Arctic Region. January 2014. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/implementation_plan_for_the_national_strategy_for_the_arctic_region_-_fi....pdf (accessed: 3 January 2021).
21. Republicans Oppose Obama’s Offshore Drilling Ban. Available at: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/3892605 (accessed: 3 January 2021) (in Russ.).
22. Zhuravel’ V.P. Arkticheskiy sovet: perekhod predsedatel’stva ot SShA k Finlyandii, dal’neyshee ukreplenie rossiysko-finlyandskogo sotrudnichestva [The Arctic Council: Transition of Chairmanship from the US to Finland, Further Strengthening of Russian-Finnish Cooperation]. Arktika i Sever, 2017, no. 28, pp. 24–35. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.28.24
23. Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region. Available at: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2016-Arctic-Strategy-UNCLAS-cleared-for-release.pdf
(accessed: 3 January 2021).
24. Zagorskiy A.V. Rossiya i SShA v Arktike. Rabochaya tetrad’ № 30/2016 [Russia and the United States in the Arctic. Workbook No. 30/2016]. Moscow, 2016. 24 p.
25. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, 2017. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed: 4 January 2021).
26. Tramp ob”yavil o vykhode SShA iz Parizhskogo soglasheniya po klimatu [Trump Announces US Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement]. BBC News. Russian Service. 1 June 2017. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-40120078 (accessed: 4 January 2021).
27. Strategic Outlook for the Arctic. January 2019. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2020/May/18/2002302034/-1/-1/1/NAVY_STRATEGIC_OUTLOOK_ARCTIC_JAN2019.PDF (accessed: 4 January 2021).
28. The United States Coast Guard’s Vision for the Arctic Region. Washington, 2019. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/13/2002130713/-1/-1/0/ARCTIC_STRATEGY_BOOK_APR_2019.PDF (accessed: 4 January 2021).
29. Report to Congress. Department of Defense Arctic Strategy. June 2019. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jun/06/2002141657/-1/-1/1/2019-DOD-ARCTIC-STRATEGY.PDF (accessed: 4 January 2021).
30. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf (accessed: 4 January 2021).
31. Tramp otmenil vvedennyy Obamoy zapret na shel’fovoe burenie [Trump Lifts Obama’s Offshore Drilling Ban]. BBC News. Russian Service. 28 April 2017. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-39752981 (accessed: 4 January 2021).
32. Tillerson rasskazal, v chem SShA otstali ot Rossii [Tillerson on How the United States Is Behind Russia]. Gazeta.ru, 28 November 2017. Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2017/11/28/n_10872584.shtml (accessed: 4 January 2021).
33. Mikhaylichenko D. Dve arkticheskikh linzy SShA [Two Arctic Lenses of the USA]. Go Arctic, 25 October 2020. Available at: https://goarctic.ru/politics/dve-arkticheskikh-linzy-ssha/ (accessed: 4 January 2021).
34. Khodarenok M. Prevoskhodstvo na mnogo let vpered: kakim budet voennyy byudzhet SShA [Superiority for Many Years to Come: What the US Military Budget Will Be]. Gazeta.ru, 4 December 2020. Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2020/12/04/13386439.shtml (accessed: 4 January 2021).