UDC

[94(47).083+94(420).083]:327(5)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V083

Authors

Andrey B. Larin
Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences; prosp. Leninskiy 32 a, Moscow, 119334, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-3997 e-mail: ab-larin@mail.ru

Abstract

This article covers the interaction between Russia and Great Britain on the Persian Question in 1911, when a number of internal and external factors caused a serious political crisis in Qajar Iran, which directly affected international relations in the Middle East. In late 1910 – early 1911, the Persian government initiated an invitation of foreign experts to reorganize the finances of Qajar Iran. As a result of a rather complex discussion between St. Petersburg, London and Tehran, it was decided to invite a group of American specialists headed by William Morgan Shuster, an American financial adviser who had previously been involved in similar activities in the Philippines. This choice was later proven unfortunate: in many ways, it was Shuster’s approach that provoked the emergence and contributed to the deepening of the 1911 crisis. In addition, the paper considers the main factors and stages of development of the crisis, Shuster’s role in the events, St. Petersburg’s and London’s policies on the issue, as well as the differences in the approaches of Russian and British diplomacy to its resolution. It is demonstrated that in the face of a significant threat to the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, the Foreign Office (represented by Sir Edward Grey) displayed a willingness to make compromises on the Persian Question in order to prevent a break in diplomatic relations with Russia. At the same time, the crisis clearly demonstrated how fragile the balance of positions of the two Powers in the region was and how easily even a regional conflict can jeopardize the relationship between the two Powers in a wider context.
For citation: Larin A.B. The Ups and Downs of the Agreed Course: Russia, Britain and the Persian Crisis of 1911. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V083

Keywords

Persian Question, Qajar Iran, Anglo-Russian diplomatic relations, Russia’s foreign policy, Great Britain’s foreign policy, A.A. Neratov, Edward Grey, William Morgan Shuster

References

1. Sergeev E.Yu. Bol’shaya igra, 1856–1907: mify i realii rossiysko-britanskikh otnosheniy v Tsentral’noy i Vostochnoy Azii [The Big Game, 1856–1907: Myths and Realities of Anglo-Russian Relations in Central and East Asia]. Moscow, 2012. 454 p.
2. Churchill R.P. The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907. Cedar Rapids, 1939. 365 p.
3. Kazemzadeh F. Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864–1914: A Study in Imperialism. New Haven, 1968. 711 p.
4. Nazem H. Russia and Great Britain in Iran (1900–1914): Based on British, French, German, Iranian, Russian, and the United States Diplomatic Documents. Tehran, 1975. 201 p.
5. Siegel J. Endgame: Britain, Russia and the Final Struggle for Central Asia. London, 2002. 273 p.
6. Greaves R. Some Aspects of the Anglo-Russian Convention and Its Working in Persia, 1907–14—I. Bull. Sch. Orient. Afr. Stud., 1968, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 69–91. DOI: 10.1017/S0041977X00112790
7. British Documents on the Origins of the War, 1898–1914. Vol. 10. Pt. 1. London, 1936.
8. Sbornik diplomaticheskikh dokumentov, kasayushchikhsya sobytiy v Persii. Vyp. 6 (s 1 yanvarya po 30 iyunya 1911 g.) [Collection of Diplomatic Documents Concerning the Events in Persia. Iss. 6 (from January 1 to June 30, 1911)]. St. Petersburg, 1913. 208 p.
9. Foreign Policy Archives of the Russian Empire (FPARE). Coll. 144. Inv. 489. Fol. 385b (in Russ.).
10. Medvedik I.S. Deyatel’nost’ britanskogo Persidskogo komiteta v zerkale rossiyskoy pressy (konets 1911 – nachalo 1912 g.) [Activity of British Persia Committee as It Is Viewed by the Russian Press (the End of 1911 – the Beginning of 1912)]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2017, no. 10-2, pp. 102–104.
11. Medvedik I.S. Deyatel’nost’ britanskogo Persidskogo komiteta v svyazi s anglo-rossiyskim sopernichestvom v Persii (1908–1913 gg.) [Activity of British Persia Committee in Relation to Anglo-Russian Rivalry in Persia (1908–1913)]. Manuskript, 2018, no. 12-1, pp. 45–48. DOI: 10.30853/manuscript.2018-12-1.9
12. Bonakdarian M. The Persia Committee and the Constitutional Revolution in Iran. Br. J. Middle East. Stud., 1991, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 186–207.
13. FPARE. Coll. 144. Inv. 489. Fol. 298b (in Russ.).
14. Larin A.B. “Pri grome orudiy i radostnykh krikakh tolpy shakh v”ekhal v Astrabad”: Rossiya, Britaniya i popytka restavratsii Mokhammad Ali-shakha [“To the Thunder of Cannon and Joyous Shouts of the Crowd the Shah Entered Astarabad”: Russia, Britain and the Attempt to Restore Mohammad Ali Shah]. Elektronnyy nauchno-obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal “Istoriya”, 2018, vol. 9, no. 8. Available at: http://history.jes.su/s207987840002504-3-1 (accessed: 21 December 2018).
15. Sbornik diplomaticheskikh dokumentov, kasayushchikhsya sobytiy v Persii. Vyp. 7 (s 1 iyulya po 31 dekabrya 1911 g.) [Collection of Diplomatic Documents Concerning the Events in Persia. Iss. 7 (from July 1 to December 31, 1911)]. St. Petersburg, 1913. 439 p.
16. FPARE. Coll. 144. Inv. 489. Fol. 386b (in Russ.).