UDC

141.333:[227.12:22.07]

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V080

Authors

Priest Aleksiy (Aleksey N. Razdorov)
Saints Cyril and Methodius Institute for Postgraduate Studies;
ul. Pyatnitskaya 4/2, 115035, Moscow, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-3141 e-mail: razdorov@bk.ru

Abstract

This article examines the New Testament teaching about man in the authentic epistles of Paul the Apostle. In particular, it studies the anthropological phenomenon of conscience as one of the important ethical terms in Christian worldview. In spite of the fact that this topic has been thoroughly investigated by Western biblical science, Russian theological environment has not been paying it sufficient attention. Therefore, from the position of theological and philological research within the framework of the historical and cultural approach, the article dwells on conscience expressed by Paul the Apostle through the term συνείδησις in the epistles to the Corinthians and the Romans, whose authorship as St. Paul’s is unquestioned by modern biblical studies. The research shows that Paul the Apostle used the term συνείδησις in a sense related to human awareness, without any explicit emphasis on morality as in the works by Stoic philosophers. For St. Paul, the term συνείδησις in a general sense means an autonomous anthropological instance of a person’s judgеment/assessment of his/her own behaviour in relation to the norms, laws and rules adopted by him/her. However, depending on the historical circumstances in the life of Christian communities, Paul the Apostle gave this term his own semantic connotations. According to this research, in the text of the Pauline epistles συνείδησις appears not only as a general anthropological phenomenon, but also as an independent (autonomous) personified witness to the truth, as an instance that checks the correspondence between the declared value norms in the mind and the person’s own behaviour. This instance reflects the mental activity of a conscious human as a person in any cultural and historical epoch regardless of his/her religious preferences.
For citation: Priest Aleksiy (Razdorov A.N.). New Testament Anthropology: Conscience as an Anthropological Phenomenon in the Context of the Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 114–124. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V080

Keywords

Christian anthropology, Paul the Apostle’s anthropology, epistles to the Corinthians, Epistle to the Romans, phenomenon of conscience, self-consciousness/consciousness, instance of judgеment/ assessment, witness to the truth

References

1. Shveytser A. Mistika apostola Pavla [The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle]. Chernyavskiy A.L. (comp.). Khristos ili Zakon? Apostol Pavel glazami novozavetnoy nauki [Christ or Law? Paul the Apostle Viewed by the New Testament Science]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 21–370.
2. Aleksiy (Razdorov), priest. Istoricheskiy ekskurs v issledovanie voprosa o proiskhozhdenii i opredelenii antropologicheskogo ponyatiya συνείδησις apostola Pavla v zapadnoy bibleistike [A Historical Excursion into the Study of the Origin and Definition of Paul the Apostle’s Anthropological Concept of Syneidesis in Western Biblical Studies]. Skrizhali, 2016, no. 12, pp. 31–54.
3. Iannuariy (Ivliev), archimandrite. Poslaniya Apostola Pavla k Timofeyu [Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle to Timothy]. Available at: https://spbda.ru/publications/arhimandrit-iannuariy-ivliev-poslaniya-apostola-pavla-k-timofeyu/ (accessed: 29 March 2019).
4. Lan V.L. Poslanie k Evreyam [Epistle to the Hebrews]. Martin R.P., Reid D.G., Evans C.A. (eds.). Slovar’ Novogo Zaveta. T. 2. Mir Novogo Zaveta [Dictionary of the New Testament. Vol. 2. The World of the New Testament]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 233–245.
5. Domuschi S. Fenomen sovesti v pravoslavnom bogoslovii i russkoy religiozno-filosofskoy traditsii [The Phenomenon of Conscience in Orthodox Theology and Russian Religious and Philosophical Tradition: Diss.]. Sergiev Posad, 2012. 293 p.
6. Glubokovskiy N.N. Blagovestie sv. apostola Pavla po ego proiskhozhdeniyu i sushchestvu. Bibleysko-bogoslovskoe issledovanie [The Gospel According to St. Paul: Its Origin and Essence. A Biblical and Theological Research]. Book 2. St. Petersburg, 1910. 1306 p.
7. Merkel H. Die Pastoralbriefe. Göttingen, 1991. 114 p.
8. Maurer C. Συνείδησις. Kittel G., Friedrich G. (eds.). Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, 1971. Vol. 7, pp. 898–919.
9. Jewett R. Paul’s Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden, 1971. 503 р.
10. Eckstein H.-J. Der Begriff Syneidesis bei Paulus: Eine neutestamentlich-exegetische Untersuchung zum ,Gewissensbegriff‘. Tübingen, 1983. 340 p.
11. Kampling R. Gewissen. Berlejung A., Frevel C. (eds.). Handbuch theologischer Grundbegriffe zum Alten und Neuen Testament. Darmstadt, 2006, pp. 220–221.
12. Stelletskiy N.S. Opyt nravstvennogo pravoslavnogo bogosloviya v apologeticheskom osveshchenii [Experience of Moral Orthodox Theology from the Standpoint of Apologetics]. Kharkov, 1914. Vol. 1. 502 p.
13. Iannuariy (Ivliev), archimandrite. Osnovnye antropologicheskie ponyatiya v poslaniyakh svyatogo apostola Pavla [Key Anthropological Concepts in the Epistles of St. Paul the Apostle]. Pravoslavnoe uchenie o cheloveke [Orthodox Teaching About Man]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 18–23.
14. Vevyurko I.S. Apostol Pavel: nachala khristianskoy antropologii [St. Paul the Apostle: The Fundamentals of Christian Anthropology: Diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 149 p.
15. Conzelmann H. Der erste Brief an die Korinther. Göttingen, 1981. 372 p.
16. Euripides. Orestes. Murray G. (ed.). Euripidis Fabulae. Vol. 3. Oxford, 1913. Available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/collection?collection=Perseus:collection:Greco-Roman (accessed: 28 October 2019).
17. Chadwick H. Gewissen. Klauser T. et al. (eds.). Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum: Sachwörterbuch zur Auseinandersetzung des Christentums mit der antiken Welt. Stuttgart, 1978. Vol. 10. 1285 p.
18. Schinkel A. Conscience and Conscientious Objections. Amsterdam, 2007. 638 p.
19. Fee G.D. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids, 1987. 880 p.
20. Söding T. Starke und Schwache. Der Götzenopferstreit in 1Kor 8–10 als Paradigma paulinischer Ethik. ZNW, 1994, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 69–92. DOI: 10.1515/zntw.1994.85.1-2.69
21. Keener C.S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downers Grove, 1993 (Russ. ed.: Kiner K. Bibleyskiy kul’turno-istoricheskiy kommentariy. Ch. 2. Novyy Zavet. St. Petersburg, 2005. 733 p.).
22. Schrage W. Der erste Brief an die Korinther (1Kor 1,1–6,11). Zürich, 1991. 436 p.
23. Wolff C. Der zweite Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Berlin, 1989. 269 p.
24. Fitzmyer J.A. Pauline Theology. Brown R.E., Fitzmyer J.A., Murphy R.E. (eds.). The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Upper Saddle River, 1990. 1484 p.
25. Plummer A. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians. Edinburgh, 1999. 404 p.
26. Lohse E. Der Brief an die Römer. Göttingen, 2007. 423 p.
27. Gathercole S.J. A Law unto Themselves: The Gentiles in Romans 2:14–15 Revisited. J. Study New Testam., 2002, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 27–49. DOI: 10.1177/0142064X0202400302
28. Pesch R. Römerbrief. Würzburg, 1994. 115 p. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V08