UDC

140.8:1(091)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V079

Authors

Il’ya V. Demin
Samara National Research University;
Moskovskoe sh. 34, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5821-3031 e-mail: ilyadem83@yandex.ru

Abstract

This article analyses the concept of scientific worldview in the Russian philosophical journalism of the first quarter of the 20th century. It examines and compares the interpretations of scientific worldview in the works by V.I. Vernadsky and L.M. Lopatin. Both philosophers distanced themselves from the positivist model of scientific knowledge; however, Lopatin was able to identify certain elements of positivism in Vernadsky’s ideas on the relationship between philosophy and science. It should be noted that Lopatin left unchanged the juxtaposition of metaphysics and positivism. The definitions of scientific worldview given by the two Russian philosophers are tautological, being reduced to the following: scientific worldview is a set of ideas about the world shared by the majority of scientists of a particular era. Vernadsky and Lopatin used the term scientific worldview as a synonym for the concepts of science, scientific knowledge, scientific thinking, and scientific way of comprehending the world, without attributing any additional meaning to it. The dispute over scientific worldview is actually a dispute about the metaphysical origins, foundations and prerequisites of scientific knowledge as such. The expression scientific worldview (when it implies an organized conceptual unity and not just a set of conclusions in special sciences) indicates no more than one or another metaphysical system and the principle (or set of principles) of thinking that determines it. Thus, the concept of scientific worldview in the works by Vernadsky and Lopatin expresses a vain pursuit to preserve the conceptual unity of philosophical and scientific knowledge, without dissolving philosophy in the theory and methodology of science.
For citation: Demin I.V. The Concept of Scientific Worldview in the Russian Philosophy of the First Quarter of the 20th Century (Based on the Works by V.I. Vernadsky and L.M. Lopatin). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 101–113. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V079

Keywords

scientific worldview, scientific knowledge, philosophical foundations of science, positivism, scientism, Vernadsky’s philosophical realism, Lopatin’s spiritualistic monism

References

1. Vernadsky V.I. O nauchnom mirovozzrenii [On Scientific Worldview]. Vernadsky V.I. Nauchnaya mysl’ kak planetnoe yavlenie [Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 191–234.
2. Bernal J.D. Science in History. London, 1954 (Russ. ed.: Bernal Dzh.D. Nauka v istorii obshchestva. Moscow, 1956. 735 p.).
3. Pavlov A.T. V.I. Vernadskiy i L.M. Lopatin o filosofii i ee meste v dukhovnoy zhizni chelovechestva [V.I. Vernadsky and L.M. Lopatin About Philosophy and Its Place in the Spiritual Life of Mankind]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya, 2015, no. 5, pp. 3–15.
4. Mamzin A.S. Nauchnoe mirovozzrenie, vnenauchnoe poznanie i chelovek v kognitologii V.I. Vernadskogo (k 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) [Scientific Outlook, Non-Scientific Cognition, and Man in V.I. Vernadsky’s Cognitology (to V. Vernadsky’s 150th Anniversary)]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2013, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 127–134.
5. Rickert H. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen, 1910. 151 p. (Russ. ed.: Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture. Moscow, 1998. 410 p.).
6. Kozikov I.A. V.I. Vernadskiy o nauchnom mirovozzrenii [Vernadsky on Scientific Worldview]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 2014, no. 1, pp. 164–176.
7. Borisova I.V. Professor filosofii [Professor of Philosophy]. Lopatin L.M. Aksiomy filosofii. Izbrannye stat’i [Axioms of Philosophy. Selected Articles]. Moscow, 1996, pp. 3–18.
8. Pavlov A.T. Odin iz luchshikh filosofskikh pisateley v Rossii [One of the Best Writers-Philosophers in Russia]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 96–110.
9. Schastlivtseva E.A. Lev Mikhaylovich Lopatin: kontseptsiya spiriticheskogo monizma [Lev Mihajlovitch Lopatin: Conception of Spiritual Monism]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2009, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 34–41.
10. Troitskiy I. Analiz problem ontologii v filosofskom nasledii L.M. Lopatina [Analysis of the Problems of Ontology in the Philosophical Legacy of L.M. Lopatin]. Khristianskoe chtenie, 2012, no. 2, pp. 186–216.
11. Rezvykh T. The Evolution of the Concept of Time in the Russian Leibnizianism: A.A. Kozlov, L.M. Lopatin, S.A. Askoldov. Russ. J. Philos. Sci., 2016, no. 12, pp. 59–72 (in Russ.).
12. Lopatin L.M. Aksiomy filosofii. Izbrannye stat’i [Axioms of Philosophy. Selected Articles]. Moscow, 1996. 560 p.
13. Lopatin L.M. Nauchnoe mirovozzrenie i filosofiya [Scientific Worldview and Philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii, 1903. Book 69, pp. 404–430.
14. Patkul’ A.B. Problema sootnosheniya filosofii i nauki v kontekste filosofii nauki kak distsipliny [Relationship Between Philosophy and Science in the Context of Philosophy of Science as a Discipline]. Mysl’, 2008, no. 7, pp. 98–110.
15. Demin I.V. Vladimir Vernadskiy i Lev Lopatin: spor o nauchnom mirovozzrenii [Vladimir Vernadsky and Lev Lopatin: A Dispute About Scientific Worldview]. Prokhorov S.A. (ed.). Perspektivnye informatsionnye tekhnologii (PIT 2020) [Advanced Information Technologies (AIT-2020)]. Samara, 2020, pp. 425–429.