UDC

81’373.44:811.111-26

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V075

Authors

Elena A. Moshina
Military Educational Institution of Logistics named after General of the Army A.V. Khrulyov;
ul. Zakhar’evskaya 22, St. Petersburg, 191123, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-657X e-mail: moshina@inbox.ru

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the motivating and archaic conceptual signs of the macroconcept “earth/land” through data analysis of etymological and historical-etymological dictionaries, as well as to demonstrate the solidity (syncretism) of native Old English speakers’ perception of this macroconcept. Cognitive analysis of linguocultural facts and a profound study of national mentality through language data determine the relevance of this study. The motivating and archaic conceptual signs of the macroconcept “earth/land” have not previously been the subject of a separate research. The main methods applied in the paper are descriptive, conceptual, comparative, and interpretative. The study revealed that the macroconcept “earth/land” has a long history of development. In addition to motivating signs, its structure comprises symbolic signs that go back to ancient mythology. As early as at the beginning of its development, the macroconcept “earth/land” was reflected in native speakers’ consciousness through a large number of conceptual signs (14 signs are represented by the semantic components of earth and 20 signs are represented by the semantic components of land), suggesting high importance of this macroconcept in English linguoculture. The identified conceptual signs form a rather extensive mental structure, which includes several, inextricably linked, blocks: ‘earth/land-space’, ‘earth/land-substance’, ‘earth/landproperty’, ‘earth/land-people’, ‘earth/land-material world’. The etymological analysis of dictionary definitions of the words earth and land as well as determination of the components of their lexical meaning allow us to demonstrate the diversity of English speakers’ ancient ideas about earth/land and the syncretism of these ideas within mythological consciousness.
For citation: Моshina Е.А. Syncretism of Ancient Concepts Exemplified by the Macroconcept “Earth/Land” (a Review of Motivating and Archaic Conceptual Signs). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 61–71. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V075

Keywords

macroconcept, conceptual signs, semantic components, etymological analysis, syncretism of concepts, English linguoculture, mythological consciousness, conceptualization of earth/land

References

1. Tylor E.B. Primitive Culture. Vol. 2. London, 1873.
2. Tylor E.B. Religion in Primitive Culture. New York, 1958. 552 p.
3. Frazer J.G. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. London, 1923 (Russ. ed.: Frezer Dzh.Dzh. Zolotaya vetv’: Issledovanie magii i religii. Moscow, 2017. 799 p.).
4. Lévi-Strauss C. La Pensée sauvage. Paris, 1962 (Russ. ed.: Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. Moscow, 1999. 392 p.).
5. Huizinga J. Homo Ludens; Stat’i po istorii kul’tury [Homo Ludens; Articles on Cultural History]. Moscow, 1997. 416 p.
6. Eliade M. Myth and Reality. New York, 1968. 212 p.
7. Losev A.F. Znak. Simvol. Mif [Sign, Symbol, Myth]. Moscow, 2012. 479 p.
8. Meletinskiy E.M. Mif i istoricheskaya poetika: Izbrannye stat’i [Myth and Historical Poetics: Selected Articles]. Moscow, 2018. 695 p.
9. Campbell J. The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology. London, 1960. 504 p.
10. Il’ichev L.F., Fedoseev P.N., Kovalev S.M., Panov V.G. (eds.). Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Philosophy]. Moscow, 1983. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/735/%D0%9C%D0%98%D0%A4%D0%9E%D0%9B%D0%9E%D0%93%D0%98%D0%AF (accessed: 12 March 2020).
11. Kolesov V.V. Filosofiya russkogo slova [Philosophy of the Russian Word]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 448 p.
12. Beresneva V.A. Lingvisticheskiy sinkretizm kak aktual’naya kategoriya sovremennogo yazykoznaniya [Linguistic Syncretism as an Actual Category of Modern Linguistics]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2012, no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvisticheskiy-sinkretizm-kak-aktualnayakategoriya-sovremennogo-... (accessed: 31 February 2020).
13. Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, 2010. 2112 р.
14. Partridge E. Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. New York, 1983. Available at: https://archive.org/details/originsshortetym0000part/page/n5/mode/2up (accessed: 1 March 2020).
15. Skeat W.W. A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Oxford, 1882. Available at: https://archive.org/details/conciseetymologi002983mbp (accessed: 1 March 2020).
16. Bailey N., Miller P., Gordon G. Dictionarium Britannicum, Or, A More Compleat Universal Etymological English Dictionary Than Any Extant. London, 1730. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt? id=nyp.33433002977704;view=1up;seq=262 (accessed: 1 March 2020).
17. Bailey N. An Universal Etymological English Dictionary. London, 1763. Available at: https://archive.org/details/universaletymolo00bail (accessed: 1 March 2020).
18. Craig J. A New Universal Etymological, Technological, and Pronouncing Dictionary of the English Language. London, 1859. Available at: https://archive.org/details/anewuniversalet02craigoog (accessed: 1 March 2020).
19. Donald J. (ed.). Chambers’s Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. London, 1871. Available at: https://archive.org/details/chamberssetymolo00donarich (accessed: 1 March 2020).
20. Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: https://www.etymonline.com/word/earth#etymonline_v_941 (accessed: 1 March 2020).
21. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary (accessed: 1 March 2020).
22. Klein E. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Elsevier Publishing Company, 1971. Available at: https://archive.org/details/AComprehensiveEtymologicalDictionaryOfTheEnglishLanguageByErnestKlein/page/n13/mode/2up (accessed: 1 March 2020).
23. Dictionary.com. Available at: https://www.dictionary.com/ (accessed: 1 March 2020).
24. Kolesov V.V. “Pervosmysl” kontsepta [“Pervosmysl” of the Concept]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura, 2018, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 438–452. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2018.309
25. Pimenova M.V. Kontsept serdtse: obraz, ponyatie, simvol [The Concept of Heart: Image, Notion, Symbol]. Kemerovo, 2007. 500 p.
26. Tacitus C. O proiskhozhdenii germantsev i mestopolozhenii Germanii [On the Origin and Situation of the Germans]. Sochineniya. T. 1. Annaly. Malye proizvedeniya [Works. Vol. 1. Annals. Minor Works]. Leningrad, 1969. Available at: http://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/tacit.htm (accessed: 1 March 2020).
27. Daly K.N. Norse Mythology A to Z. New York, 2010. 128 p.
28. Simek R. Dictionary of Northern Mythology. D.S. Brewer, 2008. 438 p.
29. Faith R. The English Peasantry and the Growth of Lordship. London, 1997. 303 p.
30. Moshina E.A. Ponyatiynaya osnova kontsepta Earth/Land (Zemlya) v angliyskoy yazykovoy kartine mira [Conceptual Basis of “EARTH” in English Linguistic Picture of the World]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2019, no. 10, pp. 231–239.