UDC

94(47).05:27

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V047

Authors

Aleksandr R. Pavlushkov
Vologda Law and Economics Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia (VILE of the FPS of Russia);
ul. Shchetinina 2/a, Vologda, 160002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-5459 e-mail: apavlushkov@yandex.ru

Abstract

Based on various sources, this article attempts to determine the scope and nature of the relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Secret Chancellery during the reforms of Peter I. The chronological framework of the period under study is limited to 1718–1725. It should be noted that the number of works on this topic is rather small. The article dwells on the various aspects and forms of the relationship between the penal body and the Church as a whole. The starting point is the case of Tsarevich Alexei, which exposed the dissatisfaction of the clergy with the reforms of Peter I and initiated the strengthening of punitive policies, involving the tools of the Church. According to the author, the established relationship between the Church and the Secret Chancellery cannot be called sporadic, since there had been a certain unity of mutual interests between the parties. It is emphasized that contradictions had been accumulating between them, related to the violation of the secrecy of confession, lack of legal regulation of official relations, and structural vagueness of the institutions of the Most Holy Synod that had contacts with the Secret Chancellery. Nevertheless, in practice there had been developed a certain procedure for coordinating various issues, which both sides refrained from violating. Further, the author analyses the case of Tsarevich Alexei and the role of the first chief procurators of the Most Holy Synod in the context of the development of the relationship between the Church and the Secret Chancellery. Further, the article indicates the reasons for not only mutual interest, but also the subsequent crisis in their relationship that occurred in 1725. The author concludes that the relationship between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Secret Chancellery was in line with the policy of forming a police state.
For citation: Pavlushkov A.R. The Russian Orthodox Church and the Secret Chancellery in the Context of Reforms of Peter the Great. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 5, pp. 37–45. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V047

Keywords

Secret Chancellery, Russian Orthodox Church, Most Holy Synod, reforms of Peter I, penal institutions, police state, clergy

References

1. Anisimov E.V. Petr Velikiy: lichnost’ i reformy [Peter the Great: Personality and Reforms]. Moscow, 2009. 448 p.
2. Sheparneva A.I. Rol’ Kantselyarii taynykh rozysknykh del v istorii Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi (na primere “arkhiereyskikh protsessov” perioda tsarstvovaniya imperatritsy Anny Ioannovny) [Role of the Office of Secret Intelligence Affairs in the History of the Russian Orthodox Church (for Example, “Hierarchical Processes” Period of the Reign of Empress Anna Ioannovna)]. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, no. 9, pp. 15–20.
3. Ermakova A.A. “Tragediya v sem’e i u trona”: peterburgskiy rozysk po delu tsarevicha Alekseya Petrovicha [The Tragedy of the Family and the Crown: The Petersburg Investigation Concerning Alexei Petrovitch, Crown Prince of Russian Empire]. Vestnik GSGU, 2018, no. 1, pp. 46–64.
4. Shamin S.M. “Donosheniya” voronezhskogo svyashchennika Savvy Ivanovicha Dugina v dokumentakh Taynoy kantselyarii [Reports of Savva Ivanovich Dugin, Voronezh Priest, in the Documents of Secret Office]. Vestnik tserkovnoy istorii, 2015, no. 3-4, pp. 97–147.
5. Barsov T.V. Svyateyshiy Sinod v ego proshlom [The Most Holy Synod in Its Past]. St. Petersburg, 1896. 446 p.
6. Veretennikov V.I. Istoriya Taynoy kantselyarii Petrovskogo vremeni [The History of the Secret Chancellery Under Peter the Great]. Kharkov, 1910. 306 p.
7. Semevskiy M.I. Slovo i delo! 1700–1725 [Word and Deed! 1700–1725]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 318 p.
8. Chernikova T.V. Dokumenty kantselyarii Taynykh rozysknykh del vremen Anny Ioannovny [Documents of the Secret Investigative Office During the Reign of Anna Ioannovna]. Lyudi i teksty. Istoricheskiy al’manakh, 2018, no. 11, pp. 198–226.
9. Ustryalov N.G. Istoriya tsarstvovaniya Petra Velikogo. T. 6. Tsarevich Aleksey Petrovich [The History of the Reign of Peter the Great. Vol. 6. Tsarevich Alexei Petrovich]. St. Petersburg, 1859. 660 p.
10. Russkiy biograficheskiy slovar’. T. II. Aleksinskiy – Bestuzhev-Ryumin [Russian Dictionary of Biographies. Vol. 2. Aleksinsky – Bestuzhev-Ryumin]. St. Petersburg, 1900. 796 p.
11. Smolich I.K. Istoriya Russkoy Tserkvi. 1700–1917 gg. [The History of the Russian Church. 1700–1917]. Ch. 2, par. 2/v. Available at: https://pravbiblioteka.ru/reader/?bid=72715#TOC_id1587448 (accessed: 28 April 2020).
12. Dukhovnyy reglament vsepresvetleyshego, derzhavneyshego gosudarya Petra Pervogo, imperatora i samoderzhtsa vserossiyskogo [Spiritual Regulations of the Most Serene Highness, Most Powerful Sovereign Peter the Great, Emperor and Autocrat of All Russia]. Moscow, 1904. 202 p.
13. Karpenko S.V. Mikhail Khrushchov, Stepan Sheshkovskiy i “preobrazhen’e” Taynoy kantselyarii v Taynuyu ekspeditsiyu [Mikhail Khrushchov, Stepan Sheshkovsky and the “Transformation” of the Secret Chancellery into the Secret Expedition]. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik, 2010, no. 24, pp. 58–109.
14. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel’stvo X–XX vekov. T. 4. Zakonodatel’stvo perioda stanovleniya absolyutizma [Russian Legislation of the 10th–20th Centuries. Vol. 4. Legislation During the Development of Absolutism]. Moscow, 1986. 512 p.
15. Polnoe sobranie postanovleniy i rasporyazheniy po vedomstvu pravoslavnogo ispovedaniya Rossiyskoy imperii. T. 2. 1722–1872 [Complete Collection of Resolutions and Directions for the Department of the Orthodox Confession of the Russian Empire. Vol. 2. 1722–1872]. St. Petersburg, 1872. 685 p., no. 557, 680.
16. Opisanie dokumentov i del, khranyashchikhsya v arkhive Svyateyshego Pravitel’stvuyushchego Sinoda. T. 3 (1723 g.) [Description of Documents and Folders Kept in the Archives of the Most Holy Governing Synod. Vol. 3 (1723)]. St. Petersburg, 1878. 4 p., 668, col. CCVI, 86, 2, IV p., no. 193, 264, 266, 273.
17. Pavlushkov A.R. Kolodniki Svyateyshego Sinoda: pravovoy status i gosudarstvennoe yuridicheskoe oformlenie [Kolodniki (Arrested Persons) of the Apostolic Synod: The Legal Status and Legal Implementation]. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie, 2012, no. 4, pp. 81–85.
18. Pavlushkov A.R. Karatel’no-ispravitel’naya sistema Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi v imperskiy period [The Penal and Correctional System of the Russian Orthodox Church During the Imperial Period]. Vologda, 2014. 251 p.
19. Russian State Historical Archives. Coll. 796. Inv. 205. Fol. 22. Ff. 2–26 (in Russ.).