UDC

94(47).084.8(470.11)

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V046

Authors

Vladimir P. Motrevich
Ural State Law University;
ul. Kolmogorova 54, Yekaterinburg, 620034, Sverdlovskaya obl., Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1184-3631 e-mail: vladimir.motrevich@mail.ru

Abstract

On the basis of consolidated annual reports, this paper studies the condition of the material and technical resource base and the development of agricultural production on the state farms (sovkhozes) of the Arkhangelsk Region in 1941–1945. The composition and structure of the machine and tractor fleet is analysed, showing that the deficit of fuel and lubricants in combination with worn-out equipment, lack of spare parts and underqualified machinery operators resulted in a deterioration of the use of machines. In wartime conditions, the material and technical resources of Soviet farms in the Arkhangelsk Region shrank dramatically. As a result, the volume of tractor work per farm decreased by the factor of 7.6 during the war. Unlike other regions of the country, the European North of the RSFSR saw no improvements in the material and technical resource base on its state farms at the war’s final stage. Further, the paper describes the dynamics of acreage, yield and gross harvest of agricultural crops. It was established that with the onset of war, the state farms scaled down their cropping, which was manifested in the reduction of sown areas. At the same time, the share of grain in the structure of sown areas remained unchanged, while the role of fodder crops decreased significantly and that of potatoes and vegetables increased. As a result of reduced sown areas and lower yields, the gross harvest of agricultural crops decreased. State farm animal husbandry found itself in a difficult situation as well, with reduced feed supply, deteriorated veterinary services, and widespread epizootics. The animal yield dropped markedly while the loss increased. By the end of the war, animal husbandry on the state farms of the Arkhangelsk Region was reduced to a minimum level. Simultaneously with livestock reduction, its productivity fell, which seriously affected the gross and marketable outputs of the state farms. In conclusion, the paper demonstrates the role of Soviet farms in the region’s agricultural production and determines their contribution to the victory in the war.
For citation: Motrevich V.P. State Farms of the Arkhangelsk Region During the Great Patriotic War (According to Consolidated Annual Reports). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 5, pp. 26–36. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V046

Keywords

Great Patriotic War, Arkhangelsk Region state farms, agricultural production, material and technical resources of state farms, agricultural crops, livestock farming

References

1. Bazin O.A. Deyatel’nost’ sovkhozov i kolkhozov Moskovskoy oblasti v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny (na primere Lukhovitskogo rayona) [The Activity of State and Collective Farms in the Moscow Region During the Great Patriotic War (Exemplified by the Lukhovitsy District)]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i krest’yanstvo v XIX – nachale XXI veka [The State and the Peasantry in the 19th – Early 21st Century]. Kolomna, 2015, pp. 265–269.
2. Zelenin I.E. Sovkhozy SSSR (1941–1950) [State Farms of the USSR (1941–1950)]. Moscow, 1969. 344 p.
3. Motrevich V.P. Sovkhoznoe proizvodstvo v Vostochnoy Sibiri v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny (po dannym svodnykh godovykh otchetov) [State Farm in Eastern Siberia in the Years of the Great Patriotic War (According to Consolidated Annual Reports)]. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 117–143.
4. Dimoni T.M. Agrarnoe razvitie Evropeyskogo Severa Rossii v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny [Agrarian Development of the European North of Russia During the Great Patriotic War]. Beznin M.A. (ed.). 1941–1945: uroki voyny – uroki pravdy, muzhestva i patriotizma [1941–1945: Lessons of the War Are Lessons of Truth, Courage and Patriotism]. Vologda, 2006, pp. 349–357.
5. Russian State Archives of Economics (RSAE). Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 48. F. 1; Fol. 56. F. 16 (in Russ.).
6. Mel’nik T.F. Kotlasskoe sel’khozlagotdelenie GUVS MVD SSSR: Po rassekrechennym v 1993 g. dokumentam Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Arkhangel’skoy oblasti “Prokuratura lagerey i koloniy” [Kotlas Agricultural Camp Division of the Main Directorate of Military Supply of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs: According to the Documents from the State Archives of the Arkhangelsk Region “Prosecutor’s Bodies in Camps and Colonies”, Declassified in 1993]. Virtual’nyy muzey Novomuchenikov i ispovednikov Zemli Arkhangel’skoy [Virtual Museum of the New Martyrs and Confessors of the Arkhangelsk Land]. Available at: http://arhispovedniki.ru/library/research/4359/ (accessed: 14 March 2020).
7. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. F. 31; Fol. 298. F. 22; Fol. 545. F. 92; Fol. 791. F. 35; Fol. 1257. Ff. 26, 29, 32 (in Russ.).
8. State Archives of the Russian Federation (SARF). Coll. 259. Inv. 6. Fol. 748. F. 7 (in Russ.).
9. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 1257. F. 44 (in Russ.).
10. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 323. Fol. 191. Ff. 20, 21 (in Russ.).
11. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. Ff. 18, 22; Fol. 298. Ff. 4, 7; Fol. 545. Ff. 74, 75, 77; Fol. 791. Ff. 18, 21; Fol. 1257. Ff. 26, 29, 32 (in Russ.).
12. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. Ff. 18, 22; Fol. 298. Ff. 4, 7; Fol. 545. Ff. 74, 77; Fol. 791. Ff. 18, 21; Fol. 1257. Ff. 26, 29 (in Russ.).
13. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. Ff. 18, 21; Fol. 298. Ff. 7, 9; Fol. 545. Ff. 77, 78; Fol. 791. Ff. 18, 21; Fol. 1257. Ff. 29, 30 (in Russ.).
14. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 323. Fol. 48. Ff. 1–4, 40 (in Russ.).
15. SARF. Coll. 259. Inv. 1a. Fol. 35. F. 50 (in Russ.).
16. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. F. 25; Fol. 298. F. 12; Fol. 545. F. 85 (in Russ.).
17. SARF. Coll. 5446. Inv. 1. Fol. 223. F. 156 (in Russ.).
18. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. Ff. 18, 22; Fol. 298. Ff. 13, 16; Fol. 545. Ff. 83, 86; Fol. 791. Ff. 18, 20; Fol. 1257. Ff. 35, 38 (in Russ.).
19. SARF. Coll. 259. Inv. 1. Fol. 33. F. 200 (in Russ.).
20. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. F. 18; Fol. 298. F. 16; Fol. 545. F. 86; Fol. 791. F. 12; Fol. 1257. F. 38 (in Russ.).
21. RSAE. Coll. 1562. Inv. 324. Fol. 59. F. 25; Fol. 298. F. 11; Fol. 545. F. 86; Fol. 791. F. 12; Fol. 1257. F. 38 (in Russ.).