UDC

130.2:7.046.1

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V041

Authors

Aleksandr M. Prilutskiy
The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia;
nab. reki Moyki 48, korp. 20, St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-9935 e-mail: alpril@mail.ru

Abstract

This article studies the hermeneutic and semiotic specifics of modern conspiracy theories. The conspiracy myth is a collection of mythological narratives that interpret socio-historical processes and phenomena as the result of a deliberate action by powerful forces carefully concealing their existence or any relation to these phenomena and processes. Today, conspiracy theories are turning into one of the mass ideologies, gaining supporters among various social, age, professional, and religious communities. The golden age of conspiracy myths is the postmodern era. The postmodern ideologeme of the plurality of truths and the equivalence of discourses turned out to be the paradigmatic basis for conspiracy theories. The analysis of the discursive conspiracy environment allows us to distinguish the following types of conspiracy theories: parascientific, religious, political, medical, technogenic, and fantastic. The agents and actors of a conspiracy and their opponents form hierarchical strata in terms of power, initiation into secret knowledge, and influence on social processes. Hierarchical models in conspiracy theories reinforce the illocutionary potential of discourse. The research concludes that the conspiracy myth is a special hermeneutic system that allows one to form competitive discourses claiming the ability to fulfil an etiological function and at the same time introduce sacredness into everyday life, interpreting it as a space of “sacred struggle” with powerful enemies. Being largely a product of archaic culture, the conspiracy myth preserves a special type of rationality inherent in the archaic, which is easily compatible with the epistemological ideas of contemporary mass culture.

Keywords

conspiracy myth, hermeneutics, semiotics, semiotic drift

References

1. Sunstein C.R., Vermeule A. Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. J. Polit. Philos., 2009, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 202–227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
2. Dugin A. Konspirologiya (nauka o zagovorakh, sekretnykh obshchestvakh i taynoy voyne) [Conspirology (the Science of Conspiracies, Secret Societies and Secret War)]. Moscow, 2005. 624 p.
3. Levy N. Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories. Episteme, 2007, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 181–192. DOI: 10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.181
4. Khmelevskiy S.V. Problematika, napravleniya, evristicheskiy potentsial sovremennoy konspirologii [Problem Areas, Trends, Heuristic Potential of Modern Conspirology]. Sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki, 2013, no. 2, pp. 62–73.
5. Panchenko A.A. Antropologiya i konspirologiya [Anthropology and Conspiracy Theories]. Antropologicheskiy forum, 2015, no. 27, pp. 89–94.
6. Trakhtenberg D. D’yavol i evrei: Srednevekovye predstavleniya o evreyakh i ikh svyaz’ s sovremennym antisemitizmom [The Devil and the Jews: Mediaeval Ideas of the Jews and Their Connection with Modern AntiSemitism]. Moscow, 1998. 293 p.
7. Shnirel’man V.A. Koleno Danovo: eskhatologiya i antisemitizm v sovremennoy Rossii [The Tribe of Dan: Eschatology and Anti-Semitism in Contemporary Russia]. Moscow, 2017. 617 p.
8. Dvornikov V.V. Konspirologiya kak destruktsiya poznaniya i fenomen massovoy kul’tury [Conspiracy Theories as Destruction of Knowledge and the Phenomenon of Mass Culture]. Krasnova N.A. (ed.). International Conference on Social Science, Arts, Business and Education. Vienna, 2016, pp. 634–643.
9. Andreev D.A., Prozorov V.B. Konspirologiya i eskhatologiya na rubezhe milleniumov [Conspirology and Eschatology at the Turn of the Millennia]. Mezhdu kanunami. Istoricheskie issledovaniya v Rossii za poslednie 25 let [Between the Eves. Historical Research in Russia Over the Past 25 Years]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 154–176.
10. Kormina Zh.V. Drozhzhi-ubiytsy: gastronomicheskaya konspirologiya i kul’tura nedoveriya v sovremennoy Rossii [Killer Yeast: The Gastronomic Conspiracy and Culture of Distrust in Contemporary Russia]. Antropologicheskiy forum, 2015, no. 27, pp. 142–175.
11. Shtyrkov S. Dukhovnoe videnie istorii kak diskursivnyy poryadok politicheskoy eskhatologii: ubiystvo sem’i Nikolaya II v pozdne- i postsovetskoy pravoslavnoy istoriosofii [The Spiritual Version of History and Discursive Order of Political Eschatology: Theology of Ritual in Contemporary Orthodox Historiosophy and Conspirology]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2019, no. 4, pp. 130–166.
12. Andreeva T.V. Aleksandr I i mifologema “vseevropeyskogo zagovora revolyutsionerov” [Alexander I and the Myth of All-European Conspiracy of Revolutionaries, 1820–1825]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 2, 2008, no. 4, pt. 1, pp. 25–34.
13. Prilutskiy A.M. Kontsept “zhidomasonstvo” kak pustoe ramochnoe ponyatie i semioticheskaya fiktsiya [The Concept of Jewish Freemasonry as an Empty Framework Concept and Semiotic Fiction]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2019, no. 3, pp. 117–127.
14. Brotherton R., French C.C. Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy. Appl. Cogn. Psychol., 2014, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 238–248. DOI: 10.1002/acp.2995
15. Buenting J., Taylor J. Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data. Philos. Soc. Sci., 2010, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 567–578. DOI: 10.1177/0048393109350750
16. Coady D. Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational? Episteme, 2007, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–204. DOI: 10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.193
17. Karandashov V.D., Lebedev V.Yu. Prolegomeny semio-germenevticheskogo religiovedeniya [Prolegomena of Semio-Hermeneutic Religious Studies]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, 2017, no. 3, pp. 124–133.
18. Barkov S.A., Zubkov V.I. Monologi i dialogi o postmoderne i postmodernizme [Monologues and Dialogues on Postmodernity and Postmodernism]. Moscow, 2019. 376 p.
19. Kadurina N.V. Konspirologicheskie podkhody k reprezentatsii politicheskikh protsessov [Conspirological Approaches to the Representation of Political Processes]. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem (elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal), 2013, no. 6. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konspirologicheskie-podhody-kreprezentatsii-politicheskih-protsess... (accessed: 20 June 2020). DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2013-6-26
20. Stenqvist C. The God Question. Existenz, 2012, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 49–51.
21. Jolley D., Douglas K.M., Leite A.C., Schrader T. Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Intentions to Engage in Everyday Crime. Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 2019, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 534–549.
22. Prilutskiy A.M. Semio-germenevticheskie osobennosti diskursov strakha sovremennoy marginal’noy religioznosti [Semiotic and Hermeneutic Specifics of the Discourses of Fear in Modern Marginal Religiosity]. Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 185–193.
23. Volkov V.N. Arkhaika russkoy kul’tury i modernizatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva [Russian Culture Archaic Character and Russian Society Modernization]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, no. 11, pp. 30–33.
24. Shcherbinina N.G. Arkhaika v rossiyskoy politicheskoy kul’ture [The Archaic in Russian Political Culture]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 1997, no. 5, pp. 127–139.