UDC

101.1:[316+378]

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V023

Authors

Sergey E. Sorokin
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; nab. Severnoy Dviny 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-0676 e-mail: s.sorokin@narfu.ru

Abstract

This article discusses the scientific approaches to understanding the mission of universities at different stages in history and at present. The author aims to analyse the philosophical ideas on this issue from the point of view of the liberal and the pragmatic approaches, which are fundamentally shared by most researchers in their understanding of the purpose, essence and content of the university’s activities. Proponents of the liberal approach consider the key mission of the university to be the search for pure knowledge that enriches the individual and gives him/her a reason for self-improvement. Within the framework of the utilitarian approach, the task of universities is to ensure technical progress and commercialize knowledge in close connection with economic institutions. This is becoming relevant in the context of the information society, which has replaced the post-industrial society and whose main value is information based on knowledge. Having traced the evolution of views on the role and place of mediaeval, pre-classical, classical and post-classical universities in the society, the author considers the contemporary models of their transformation (entrepreneurial, research, innovation, remote, network, and corporate). It is concluded that most models of university development today operate within the framework of the utilitarian approach, which limits the scope of their tasks, leaving highly important issues of fundamental research out of the spotlight. According to the author, the work of universities has to integrate the two approaches either by creating a new model that combines them or by functionally separating universities within the existing models, distinguishing between those prioritising the liberal values of education and those focusing on utilitarian tasks.

Keywords

mission of universities, information society, pure knowledge, commercialization of knowledge, post-classical university

References

1. Gusakovskiy M.A., Polonnikov A.A. (eds.). Ideya universiteta: paradoksy samoopisaniya [The Idea of the University: The Paradoxes of Self-Description]. Minsk, 2002. 244 p.
2. Kudryashova E.V., Sorokin S.E., Kudryashov Yu.V., Bugaenko O.D. Federal’nye universitety – realizatsiya “trekh missiy” [Federal Universities: Implementation of the “Three Missions”]. Arkhangelsk, 2019. 415 p.
3. Povzun V.D. Missiya universiteta – istoriya i sovremennost’ [The University’s Mission: History and Modernity]. Vestnik OGU, 2005, no. 1, pp. 13–21.
4. Rodachin V.M. Evolyutsiya missii vuzov i vuzovskoy nauki: istoriya i sovremennost’ [The Evolution of the Mission of Universities and of University Research: History and Modernity]. Universum: Obshchestvennye nauki: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2017, no. 4. Available at: http:7universum.com/ru/social/archive/item/4685 (accessed: 11 February 2020).
5. Roug V. Universitet kak yavlenie srednevekovoy kul’tury [The University as a Phenomenon of Mediaeval Culture]. Vestik vysshey shkoly, 1991, no. 7, pp. 100–106.
6. Sokhranyaeva T.V. K voprosu o kul’turnoy missii sovremennogo universiteta [On the Cultural Mission of the Modern University]. Vestnik MGTU, 2006, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 114–119.
7. Komenskiy Ya.A. Pansoficheskaya shkola, to est’ shkola vseobshchey mudrosti [Pansophic School, That Is, the School of Universal Wisdom]. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Selected Works on Pedagogy]. Moscow, 1982. Vol. 2, pp. 44–99.
8. Zakharov I.V., Lyakhovich E.S. Missiya universiteta v evropeyskoy kul’ture [The Mission of the University in European Culture]. Moscow, 1994. 240 p.
9. Newman J.H. Ideya Universiteta [The Idea of a University]. Minsk, 2006. 208 p.
10. Vеblеn Т. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York, 1934 (Russ. ed.: Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa. Moscow, 1984. 367 p.).
11. Hutchins R.M. The University of Utopia. Chicago, 1953. 103 p.
12. Ortega y Gasset J. Vosstanie mass [The Revolt of the Masses]. Moscow, 2001. 512 p.
13. Dukhavneva A.V., Stolyarenko L.D. Istoriya zarubezhnoy pedagogiki i filosofiya obrazovaniya [The History of Foreign Pedagogy and the Philosophy of Education]. Rostov-on-Don, 2000. 480 p.
14. Dewey J. How We Think. Boston, 1910. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: D’yui Dzh. Psikhologiya i pedagogika myshleniya. Moscow, 1997. 208 p.).
15. Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture of Social Forecasting. New York, 1973 (Russ. ed.: Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo: Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya. Moscow, 1999. 785 p.).
16. Konstantinov G.N., Filonovich S.R. Chto takoe predprinimatel’skiy universitet [What Is a Business-Oriented University?]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007, no. 1, pp. 49–62.
17. Grudzinskiy A.O. Universitet kak predprinimatel’skaya organizatsiya [University as a Business Organization]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2003, no. 4, pp. 113–121.
18. Knyazev E.A., Drantusova N.V. Seti v professional’nom obrazovanii [Nets in Professional Education]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 2010, no. 5, pp. 24–31.