CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

On Linguistic Means of Metaphorical Influence in Georgian Pre-Election Discourse. P. 15–23

Версия для печати

Section: Linguistics

UDC

[81’42+81’373.612.2]:811.353.1

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V015

Authors

Oksana F. Akhmetgareeva
Military University of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation; ul. Bol’shaya Sadovaya 14, Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7010-3211 e-mail: oksanafed1979@mail.ru

Abstract

This article analyses the role of metaphor in the texts of public election speeches of Georgian politicians. Metaphor is a form of artistic representation of reality through language and an effective tool that contributes to the formation of the linguistic worldview. This tool has the strongest pragmatic effect, since it combines pragmatic, cognitive, and linguistic knowledge in relation to culture, ideology, and history. Often we understand and accept reality through the prism of metaphorical models, established stereotypes, and prototypes. Moreover, it is obvious that political activity cannot exist without the use of language, which implies a certain pragmatic goal. Metaphor is one of the most effective tools of persuasion in pre-election political discourse, while the analysis of political texts in the pre-election period is one of the most interesting topics for scholars in the field of political communication. Indeed, metaphor can be considered as one of the ways to creatively present one’s ideas and postulates during the election campaign. The use of metaphors is characteristic of contemporary political discourse in many languages. This article attempts to illustrate the main trends in the use of metaphor in political discourse, which is typical of Georgian candidates. The choice of texts from the contemporary preelection discourse in Georgia is explained by the fact that there are no works related to the study of Georgian-language political texts in the framework of political linguistics. The author believes that the materials presented in this paper can be of interest and use for linguists, experts in Kartvelian languages and specialists in cross-cultural communication.

Keywords

Georgian political discourse, pre-election discourse, political linguistics, metaphor of political discourse
Download (pdf, 0.5MB )

References

1. Alpatov V.M. Ob antropotsentrichnom i sistemotsentrichnom podkhodakh k yazyku [On the Anthropocentric and the System-Centric Approaches to Language]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1993, no. 3, pp. 15–26.
2. Chudinov A.P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Metaphorical Mosaic in Modern Political Communication]. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 248 p.
3. Chudinov A.P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale [Russia in the Metaphorical Mirror]. Russkaya rech’, 2001, no. 1, pp. 34–41.
4. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 1980. 242 p.
5. Baranov A.N. Predislovie redaktora. Kognitivnaya teoriya metafory: pochti dvadtsat’ pyat’ let spustya [Editor’s Preface. The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: Nearly Twenty-Five Years Later]. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 7–21.
6. Gaykova O.V. Predvybornyy diskurs kak zhanr politicheskoy kommunikatsii (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Pre-Election Discourse as a Genre of Political Communication (Based on the English Language): Diss.]. Volgograd, 2003. 211 p.
7. Zheltukhina M.R. Spetsifika vliyaniya verbaliki i neverbaliki mass-medial’noy kommunikatsii na izbiratel’nyy protsess [The Specifics of the Influence of Verbal and Nonverbal Means of Mass-Media Communication on the Election Process]. Sorokin Yu.A., Zheltukhina M.R. (eds.). Massovaya kul’tura na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov: chelovek i ego diskurs [Mass Culture at the Turn of the 21st Century: Man and His Discourse]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 109–132.
8. Levshina N.G. Rechevye taktiki v predvybornom obrashchenii (analiz dvukh predvybornykh obrashcheniy kandidatov v gubernatory Sankt-Peterburga) [Speech Tactics in Pre-Election Address (Analysis of Two Election Addresses of Candidates for Saint-Petersburg Governor)]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 9: Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika, 2005, no. 1, pp. 47–56.
9. Sukhanov Yu.Yu. Semanticheskie i kognitivnye osobennosti predvybornoy ritoriki v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale vystupleniy politikov SShA) [Semantic and Cognitive Features of Pre-Election Rhetoric in Political Discourse (Based on Speeches by US Politicians): Diss.]. Moscow, 2019. 152 p.
10. Filinskiy A.A. Kriticheskiy analiz politicheskogo diskursa predvybornykh kampaniy 1999–2000 gg. [A Critical Analysis of the Political Discourse of the 1999–2000 Election Campaigns: Diss.]. Tver, 2002. 163 p.
11. Baranov A.N., Karaulov Yu.N. Slovar’ russkikh politicheskikh metafor [A Dictionary of Russian Political Metaphors]. Moscow, 1994. 330 p.
12. Sheygal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [The Semiotics of Political Discourse]. Moscow, 2004. 326 p.
13. Sidorova N.A. Appertseptsionnaya baza dialoga: k postanovke problemy [The Apperceptional Basis of Dialogue: On the Statement of the Problem]. Uchenye zapiski Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’nogo universiteta, 2010, no. 5, pp. 157–161.
14. Mikhaleva O.L. Politicheskiy diskurs: sposoby realizatsii agonal’nosti [Political Discourse: Means of Realization of Agonism]. Available at: http://www.rus-lang.com/about/group/mikhaleva/state2.2005 (accessed: 1 April 2020).

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North