UDC

167/168:57

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V008

Authors

Adrian M. Bekarev
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; prosp. Gagarina 23, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9766-0798 e-mail: adrian.bekarev@yandex.ru
Galina S. Pak
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; prosp. Gagarina 23, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-4371 e-mail: pakgalina5@philosophy.unn.ru

Abstract

The concept of rationality is characterized by immanent uncertainty: is it a rationality of life or a rationality specified by the concept “life”? For the philosophical discourse, the concept of rationality is most important. This paper aimed to demonstrate how the concept “life” specifies the concept “rationality”. There are two strategies used to determine rationality: absolutist and relativist; they are not mutually exclusive, but presuppose each other. Rationality is knowledge of a special kind and, like truth, is procedural. It is obvious that in Nietzsche’s philosophical aspect of life, which does not deny the ability of the human mind, the mind is just a servant of life. The Nietzschean will to power sounds like a hymn to human freedom. The essence of the Nietzschean concept of life is represented in his “Die at the right time!” manifest. Nietzsche’s position coincides with liberal humanism, but contradicts the ideas of socialist humanism. The scientific study of life is multidisciplinary. In this context, life is analysed as the basis of human freedom: from the ability of chemical autocatalysts to mutate, through the “power of will” to human freedom. The “power of will” characterizes the range of an organism’s freedom in its movement towards death. At the stage of post-non-classical science, interdisciplinarity is replaced by transdisciplinarity, which means going beyond scientific knowledge into the sphere of culture and everyday life. The scientific and the philosophical understandings of life are drawn closer together. Biological rationality appears as a dilemma: life is rational because it is a prerequisite for freedom, while ending one’s own life to assert freedom is also rational. The realities of the digital society chart a course for rationality to go beyond humanism. Biological rationality is a significant stage in the development of rationality, which is eliminated by its further development.
For citation: Bekarev A.M., Pak G.S. Humanistic Dimension of Biological Rationality. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 2, pp. 72–82. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V008

Keywords

rationality, life sciences, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, dilemma of biological rationality, humanism

References

1. Porus V.N. Ratsional’naya kommunikatsiya i kommunikativnaya ratsional’nost’: epistemologicheskiy analiz [Rational Communication and Communicative Rationality: An Epistemological Analysis]. Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii [Epistemology Today. Ideas, Problems, Discussions]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2018, pp. 79–93.
2. Mezhuev V.M. Esli chelovek ne nuzhdaetsya v svobode, to i filosofiya emu ni k chemu… [If a Person Does Not Need Freedom, He Does Not Need Philosophy Either…]. Novaya gazeta. Nauchno-populayrnoe prilozhenie “Kentavr”, 29 October 2007, no. 6.
3. Nietzsche F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo [Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None]. Moscow, 1990. 301 p.
4. Jaspers K. Vtoraya glava: Kak my ponimaem Nitsshe [Book Two: The Basic Thoughts of Nietzsche]. Jaspers K. Nitsshe. Vvedenie v ponimanie ego filosofstvovaniya [Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activity]. St. Petersburg, 2004, pp. 551–606.
5. Nietzsche F. Antikhristianin [The Antichrist]. Nietzsche F., Freud S., Fromm E., Camus A., Sartre J.-P. Sumerki bogov [Twilight of the Gods]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 17–93.
6. Rousseau J.-J. Pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Works on Pedagogy]. Moscow, 1981. Vol. 1. 656 p.
7. Feyerabend P.K. Nauka v svobodnom obshchestve [Science in a Free Society]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo, 2009, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 85–100.
8. von Mises L. Liberalizm v klassicheskoy traditsii [Liberalism in the Classical Tradition]. Moscow, 1995. 176 p.
9. Hayek F.A. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, 1944 (Russ. ed.: fon Khayek F.A. Doroga k rabstvu. Moscow, 2005. 264 p.).
10. Sartre J.-P. Ekzistentsializm – eto gumanizm [Existentialism Is a Humanism]. Nietzsche F., Freud S., Fromm E., Camus A., Sartre J.-P. Sumerki bogov [Twilight of the Gods]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 319–344.
11. Parmon V.N., Savinov E.N., Savinova E.R., et al. Fotokataliticheskoe preobrazovanie solnechnoy energii. Ch. 2. Molekulyarnye sistemy dlya razlozheniya vody [Photocatalytic Conversion of Solar Energy. Part 2. Molecular Systems
for the Decomposition of Water]. Novosibirsk, 1985. 246 p.
12. Marie François Xavier Bichat. Prokhorov A.M. (ed.). Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia]. Moscow, 1970. Vol. 3.
13. Liseev I.K. (ed.). Nauki o zhizni i sovremennaya filosofiya [Life Sciences and Contemporary Philosophy]. Moscow, 2010. 496 p.
14. Liseev I.K., Petrova E.V., Fesenkova L.V., Khen Yu.V. Nauki o zhizni segodnya: filosofskie innovatsii [Life Sciences Today: Philosophical Innovation]. Moscow, 2016. 239 p.
15. Samoilov Aleksandr Filippovich. Prokhorov A.M. (ed.). Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia]. Moscow, 1975. Vol. 22.
16. Moiseev V.I. Traditsii i novatsii v filosofii biomeditsiny [Traditions and Innovations in the Philosophy of Biomedicine]. Filosofskie problemy biologii i meditsiny. Vyp. 3. Traditsii i novatsii [Philosophical Problems of Biology and Medicine. Vol. 3. Traditions and Innovations]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 5–9.
17. Harari Y.N. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker, 2015. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Kharari Yu.N. Homo Deus. Kratkaya istoriya budushchego. Moscow, 2019. 496 p.).
18. Kemerov V.E. Reduktsionizm [Reductionism]. Kemerov V.E. (ed.). Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar’ [Modern Dictionary of Philosophy]. London, 1998, p. 736.
19. Muzrukova E.B., Fando R.A. Reduktsionizm i kholizm v poznanii zhivogo: metodologicheskiy dialog [Reductionism and Holism in a Process of Cognition of the Living: A Methodological Dialogue]. Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki, 2014, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 211–226.
20. Borzenkov V. Kategoriya “zhizn’” v nauke XX veka [The Category “Life” in Science in the 20th Century]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2007, no. 5, pp. 98–105.
21. Fedyaev A.P. Problema sushchnosti zhizni v sovremennoy nauke: sotsiokul’turnyy aspekt [The Problem of the Essence of Life in Contemporary Science: A Sociocultural Aspect]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, 2012, no. 3-2, pp. 65–68.
22. Sotsiologicheskie razmyshleniya. Interv’yu s prof. N. Lumanom [Sociological Considerations. Interview with Prof. N. Luhmann]. Problemy teoreticheskoy sotsiologii [Issues of Theoretical Sociology]. St. Petersburg, 1994, pp. 237–238.

Received: 23 September 2019
Accepted: 20 December 2019