UDC

81-139

DOI

10.37482/2227-6564-V003

Authors

Yuliya A. Gornostaeva
Siberian Federal University; prosp. Svobodnyy 82a, Krasnoyarsk, 660018, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-4995 e-mail: yulyatald@yandex.ru

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of manipulation in a polarized political discourse. A hypothesis is made here that the polyphony of voices, which was first described by M.M. Bakhtin in his concept of the polyphonic novel, can be used as a means of manipulation within two main manipulative strategies: positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation. In this paper, the voice is a key discursive category, which is widely used by the media in order to construct an alternative reality that is beneficial for certain political forces and often has nothing in common with the real state of things. The material includes articles describing the relations of two political opponents – Russia and the USA – within the context of Venezuela crisis (100 texts published from May to December 2019). Using the methodology of discourse analysis, some elements of intertextual analysis as well as corpus-based technologies (Sketch Engine corpus manager) the author found that the polyphony of voices of different orders is a manipulation tool in a polarized political media discourse. The voice in a text is represented by a cited politician whose opinion is perceived as authoritative by the victim of manipulation. Moreover, the paper distinguishes three groups of voices according to the actors’ political importance. Thus, first-order voices include Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Nicolás Maduro and Juan Guaidó; second-order voices are represented by other powerful political figures, as well as government and party members, while third-order voices are ordinary people, locals and eyewitnesses.
For citation: Gornostaeva Yu.A. The Polyphony of Voices as a Means of Manipulation in a Polarized Political Discourse. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 2, pp. 26–33. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V003

Keywords

manipulation, polyphony of voices, polarized political discourse, media discourse

References

1. Sternin I.A. Osnovy rechevogo vozdeystviya [Fundamentals of Persuasion]. Voronezh, 2012. 178 p.
2. Gornostaeva Yu.A. Verbal’nye markery manipulyatsii v angloyazychnom polyarizovannom politicheskom diskurse: opyt parametrizatsii i avtomaticheskoy obrabotki [Verbal Markers of Manipulation in the English-Language Polarized Political Discourse: Parameterization and Automatic Processing: Diss.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2018. 191 p.
3. Kolmogorova A.V., Kalinin A.A., Taldykina Yu.A. Yazykovye markery manipulyatsii v polyarizovannom politicheskom diskurse: opyt parametrizatsii [Linguistic Markers of Manipulation in Polarized Discourse: Parametric Study]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2016, no. 4, pp. 194‒199.
4. van Dijk T.A. Ideology: Multidisciplinary Approach. London, 1998. 374 p.
5. Eissa M.M. Polarized Discourse in the News. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014, vol. 134, pp. 70–91.
6. Fiorina M.P., Abrams S.A., Pope J.C. Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. J. Politics, 2008, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 556–560.
7. van Dijk T.A. Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse Soc., 2006, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 359–383.
8. Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo; Stat’i o L. Tolstom; Zapiski kursa lektsiy po istorii russkoy literatury [Collected Works. Vol. 2. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Oeuvre; Papers on Leo Tolstoy; Notes of the Course of Lectures on the History of Russian Literature]. Moscow, 2000. 798 p.
9. van Dijk T.A. What Is a Political Discourse Analysis? Belg. J. Linguist. Political Linguist., 1997, vol. 2, pp. 11–52.
10. Arnol’d I.V. Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstual’nost’ [Semantics. Stylistics. Intertextuality]. St. Petersburg, 1999. 444 p.

Received: 16 January 2020
Accepted: 27 March 2020