CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

Phrasemosemiosis as a Cognitive-Pragmatic Problem. P. 114–120

Версия для печати

Section: Reviews and Bibliography

UDC

016:81’37

DOI

10.17238/issn2227-6564.2020.1.114

Authors

Tat’yana N. Fedulenkova
Vladimir State University; ul. Gor’kogo 87, korp. 1, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-5827 e-mail: fedulenkova@list.ru

Abstract

This review gives a high assessment of N.F. Alefirenko’s innovative ideas in his interpretation of the cognitive-pragmatic theory of phrasemosemiosis. Putting forward a number of reasons, he explains the relevance of and urgent need for a theory of cognitive phraseology. Alefirenko argues for differentiating such debatable phenomena as notion and discursive-modus concept. In addition, he determines the importance of connotation interpretation as a sociocultural component of the cognitive theory of phrasemosemiosis in order to penetrate into the deep mechanisms of indirect-derivative verbalization of cognitive categories.
For citation: Fedulenkova T.N. Phrasemosemiosis as a Cognitive-Pragmatic Problem. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 114–120. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2020.1.114

Keywords

phrasemosemiosis, cognitive phraseology theory, communicative-pragmatic model, phrasemosemiosis interpretation, phraseological semantics, discursive-modus concept
Download (pdf, 0.4MB )

References

1. Kubryakova E.S., Shakhnarovich A.M., Sakharnyy L.V. Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke. Yazyk i porozhdenie rechi [Human Factor in Language. Language and Speech Production]. Moscow, 2001. 240 p.
2. Alefirenko N.F. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie istoki frazemosemiozisa [Cognitive-Pragmatic Origins of Phrasemosemiosis]. Moscow, 2018. 192 p.
3. Sperber D., Deirdre W. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, 1995. 326 p.
4. Kasher A. On the Pragmatic Modules: A Lecture. J. Pragmat., 1991, no. 16, pp. 381–397.
5. Adamia Z., Shelia M., Marghania M. A Comparative Study of Biblical Phraseological Units with White and Blue Colours in English, Russian and Georgian. Book of Abstracts: The 12th Conference of the European Society for the Study of English, 29 August – 2 September 2014. Košice, 2014, pp. 89–90.
6. Alefirenko N.F. Kognitivnaya frazeologiya: pro et contra [Cognitive Phraseology: pro et contra]. Ivanov E.E., Mokienko V.M. (eds.). Slavyanskaya frazeologiya i paremiologiya v XXI veke [Slavonic Phraseology and Paremiology in the 21st Century]. Minsk, 2010, pp. 58–65.
7. Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Modelirovanie soderzhaniya kontsepta (kognitivnaya interpretatsiya rezul’tatov lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy) [Modelling the Concept’s Content (Cognitive Interpretation of Linguistic Research)]. Problemy predstavleniya (reprezentatsii) v yazyke. Tipy i formaty znaniy [Representation Problems in Language. Types and Formats of Knowledge]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 322–329.
8. Alefirenko N.F. Frazeologiya i kognitivistika v aspekte lingvisticheskogo postmodernizma [Phraseology and Cognitive Science in the Aspect of Linguistic Postmodernism]. Belgorod, 2008. 152 p.
9. Kas’yanova L.Yu. Neofrazemika v obnovlyaemoy kartine mira [Neophrasemics in the Updated Worldview]. Frazeologiya i kognitivistika. T. 1. Idiomatika i poznanie [Phraseology and Cognitive Science. Vol. 1. Idioms and Cognition]. Belgorod, 2008, pp. 99–103.
10. Arutyunova N.D. Diskurs [Discourse]. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopaedic Dictionary]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 136–137.
11. Kovshova M.L. Lingvokul’turologicheskiy metod vo frazeologii: Kody kul’tury [Method of Linguistic Culture in Phraseology: Cultural Codes]. Moscow, 2019. 456 p.
12. Fedulenkova T.N. Glava IV. Problema varianta frazeologizma kak komponenta frazeologicheskoy modeli (na materiale angliyskogo, nemetskogo i shvedskogo yazykov) [The Problem of Phraseological Variant as a Component of the Phraseological Model (Based on English, German and Swedish)]. Alefirenko N.F., Zimin V.I., Vasilenko A.P., Fedulenkova T.N., Dobrovol’skiy D.O., Melerovich A.M., Mokienko V.M. Sovremennaya frazeologiya: tendentsii i innovatsii [Contemporary Phraseology: Trends and Innovations]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 74–105.
13. Fedulenkova T. Isomorphism and Allomorphism of English, German and Swedish Phraseological Units Based on Metaphor. Phraseology 2005: The Many Faces of Phraseology: Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Conference. Louvain-la-Neuve, 2005, pp. 125–128.
14. Fedulenkova T.N. Geneticheskiy prototip – osnova natsional’no-kul’turnoy spetsifiki frazeologicheskikh edinits [Genetic Prototype as the Basis of the National and Cultural Specifics of Phraseological Units]. Rossiya i Zapad: dialog kul’tur [Russia and the West: A Dialogue of Cultures]. Moscow, 1997. Iss. 4, pp. 81–88.

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North