UDC

[130.122+165.19]:316.77

DOI

10.17238/issn2227-6564.2020.1.80

Authors

Andrey G. Ivanov
Lipetsk State Technical University; ul. Moskovskaya 30, Lipetsk, 398600, Russian Federation; Lipetsk Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; ul. Internatsional’naya 3, Lipetsk, 398050, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-251X e-mail: agivanov2@yandex.ru

Abstract

This article studies the narrative interviews of residents of the Lipetsk Region dealing with family memory to see whether they contain any mythological fragments or elements of everyday mythology. Definitions are given of the concept everyday life as the basic form of social existence and the concept family memory as a space covering all spheres of everyday life (household, labour and leisure). The purpose of the article is to find in the narratives of respondents the stories related to the phenomenon of sacrifice and to determine the significance of such stories for family memory. The space of family memory is understood here as an object of narratives that have a certain structure, contain constructive and destructive elements and can be classified depending on the representation of key phenomena in the stories. One such phenomenon is the sacrifice. The author believes the sacrifice to be one of the most important components of the system of social mythology and refers it to the “myth-content phenomena”, which are the manifestations of social mythology in the life of society, myth-containing facts of social life. The presence of a sacrifice figure, a victim, in family stories indicates a penetration of everyday mythology into all main spheres of everyday life. Explicit or latent mentions of the victim in family stories are considered as a kind of attractor and generator of mythological structures, as a specific fragment of the narrative. The existence of the phenomenon of sacrifice in the narratives of family memory makes it possible to develop a typology of stories about family history: such narratives can fall into the category “a story containing mythologized fragments”. In addition, a conclusion is made that stories of individual families are closely related to a broader context: collective and national memory.
For citation: Ivanov A.G. Everyday Mythology: The Sacrifice Phenomenon in the Narratives of Family Memory. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 80–87. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2020.1.80

Keywords

sacrifice phenomenon, everyday life, narrative interview, everyday mythology, family history, family memory

References

1. Polyakova I.P. Sotsial’no-filosofskoe ponimanie povsednevnosti [Socio-Philosophical Understanding of Everyday Life]. Lipetsk, 2009. 138 p.
2. Radugina O.A. Povsednevnost’ kak sfera mikrosotsial’nykh otnosheniy zhizni lichnosti [Everyday Life as a Sphere of Microsocial Relations in a Person’s Life]. Nauchnyy vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturnostroitel’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 55–60.
3. Alekseev A. Pamyat’ semeynaya i istoricheskaya: tochki peresecheniya i razryvy (gipoteza o vliyanii semeynoy pamyati na mirovospriyatie) [Family Memory and Historical Memory: Intersection Points and Gaps (a Hypothesis About the Influence of Family Memory on One’s Worldview)]. Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovaniy, 2008, no. 5, pp. 49–50.
4. Logunova L.Yu. Semeyno-rodovaya pamyat’: vremennye ipostasi i sotsial’nye resursy [Family-Patrimonial Social Memory: Temporal Subsistence and Social Resources]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, no. 379, pp. 69–75.
5. Thompson P. Semeynyy mif, modeli povedeniya i sud’ba cheloveka [Family Myth, Models and a Person’s Destiny]. Loskutova M.V. (comp.). Khrestomatiya po ustnoy istorii [Selected Passages on Oral History]. St. Petersburg, 2003, pp. 110–145.
6. Schütze F. Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis, 1983, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 283–293.
7. Ivanov A.G. Mifologema geroya v strukture sotsial’nogo mifa [The Hero Mythologeme in the Structure of the Social Myth]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, no. 441, pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/441/11
8. Zenkin S.N. Nebozhestvennoe sakral’noe: Teoriya i khudozhestvennaya praktika [The Non-Divine Sacred: Theory and Literary Practice]. Moscow, 2014. 537 p.
9. Ivanov A.G. Sistema sovremennoy sotsial’noy mifologii [The System of Contemporary Social Mythology]. St. Petersburg, 2019. 182 p.
10. Nekita A.G. Ekrannye zhertvoprinosheniya: arkhaicheskiy mif i gollivudskaya khorror-reanimatsiya massovoy kul’tury [Screen Victims: Archaic Myth and the Hollywood Horror-Reanimation of Mass Culture]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser.: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2018, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 371–377.
11. Girard R. Le Bouc émissaire. Paris, 1982. 313 p. (Russ. ed.: Zhirar R. Kozel otpushcheniya. St. Petersburg, 2010. 336 p.).
12. Burkert W. Homo Necans. The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Berkley, 1983. 335 p. 
13. Maylenova F.G. Mobbing: Violence and Power Institutions in Offices. Russ. J. Philos. Sci., 2008, no. 6, pp. 63–68 (in Russ.).
14. Olick J.K. “Pamyat’ – eto ne veshch’ i ne predmet. Pamyat’ – eto nepreryvnyy protsess”. Interv’yu s Dzh. K. Olikom [“Memory Is Not a Thing, It Is Not an Object. Memory Is an Ongoing Process”. An Interview with J.K. Olick]. Istoricheskaya ekspertiza, 2018, no. 4, pp. 11–21.
15. Lempert B. Critique de la pensée sacrificielle. Paris, 2000. 240 p.