Address: office 1410a, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
http://gum.narfu.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

The Fourth Russian “Oprichnina”: Worldview Confrontation. P. 150–158

Версия для печати

Section: Philosophy, Sociology, Politology

UDC

130.3

Authors

Aleksey A. Lagunov
North-Caucasus Federal University; ul. Gagarina 400, Mikhaylovsk, 356240, Stavropol’skiy kray, Russian Federation;
e-mail: emaillag@mail.ru

Abstract

The article analyses three periods of accelerated modernization of all aspects of Russian social life (the oprichnina of Ivan the Terrible, the reformation of Peter I and the building of a socialist society). The above periods are similar in the fact that they contributed to the elimination of the political and economic strategy of power elites that was hindering social development. This strategy was based on satisfying the needs of the elites and on the well-founded tradition of boyar “feeding”, which later evolved into an all-embracing phenomenon of corruption. In addition, these three “oprichninas” destroyed the former ideological foundations, thus weakening the historically entrenched Orthodox worldview. it should be noted that the first two “oprichninas”, without changing the Orthodox ideology in general, nevertheless prepared public consciousness for its reorientation on a quasi-religious course. The open persecutions on the Orthodox ideology that followed during the Soviet period and the active secularization processes taking place in the world have changed Russian public consciousness so profoundly that it is now problematic to talk about the possibility of creating a unified state ideology; rather, an ideological dialogue is needed about common moral and cultural values. According to the author, Russia today is yet again experiencing “oprichnina”, the fourth in a row, which is standing “oprich” (beyond) the entire world and is at odds with the globally accepted worldviews, which include consumptive attitude towards the world based on the idea that the human mind prevails over nature and has a license to do anything. Therefore, this new “oprichnina”, unlike the previous ones that were predominantly managerial, becomes, in its essence, a worldview oprichnina, and its universal scale cannot be compared with that of Russia.

Keywords

historiosophy, oprichnina, secularization, symphony of authorities, Orthodoxy, quasireligions
Download (pdf, 4.1MB )

References

1. Fedotov G.P. Sobranie sochineniy T. 3. Svyatoy Filipp, mitropolit Moskovskiy. Prilozhenie: Zhitie i podvigi Filippa, mitropolita Moskovskogo i vseya Rossii [Collected Works. Vol. 3. Saint Philip, Metropolitan of Moscow. Supplement: The Life and Deeds of Philip, Metropolitan of Moscow and All Russia]. Moscow, 2000. 251 p.
2. Zhuravlev V.V. (ed.). Patriotizm i natsionalizm kak faktory rossiyskoy istorii (konets XVIII v. – 1991 g.) [Patriotism and Nationalism as Factors of Russian History (Late 18th Century – Year 1991)]. Moscow, 2015. 783 p.
3. Lagunov A.A. Religiya i ideologiya kak ekzistentsial’nye modusy cheloveka obshchestvennogo [Religion and Ideology as the Existential Modes of Man Existence]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal’nem Vostoke, 2017, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 28–32.
4. Lagunov A.A. Vera, religiya, ideologiya: “ispravlenie imen” [Faith, Religion, Ideology: Rectification of Names]. Dukhovno-nravstvennye osnovy ideologii rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti na sovremennom etape [The Spiritual and Moral Bases of the Ideology of Russian Statehood at the Present Stage]. Krasnodar, 2017, pp. 285–290.
5. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe [Sacred and Profane]. Eliade M. Izbrannye sochineniya: Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii; Obrazy i simvoly; Svyashchennoe i mirskoe [Selected Works: The Myth of the Eternal Return; Images and Symbols; Sacred and Profane]. Moscow, 2000, pp. 251–392.
6. Balagushkin E.G. Problemy morfologicheskogo analiza religiy [Problems of Morphological Analysis of Religions]. Moscow, 2003. 218 p.
7. Smirnov A.Yu., Lagunov A.A. Opredelenie etnomental’nykh kharakteristik rossiyskogo pravosoznaniya kak aktual’naya problema sotsial’noy filosofii [Identifying Ethnomental Characteristics of Russian Legal Consciousness as an Important Issue of Social Philosophy]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2011, no. 2, pp. 188–192.
8. Fedotov G.P. Budet li sushchestvovat’ Rossiya? [Will Russia Exist?]. Fedotov G.P. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2. Stat’i 20–30 gg. iz zhurnalov “Put’”, “Pravoslavnaya mysl’” i “Vestnik RKhSD” [Collected Works. Vol. 2. Articles of 1920s – 1930s from the Journals Put, Pravoslavnaya mysl, and Vestnik RKhSD]. Moscow, 1998, pp. 127–139.
9. Dukhovno-nravstvennye osnovy ideologii rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti na sovremennom etape [The Spiritual and Moral Bases of the Ideology of Russian Statehood at the Present Stage]. Krasnodar, 2017. 312 p.
10. Aleynikova L.G., Erkin A.F. Oprichnina i modernizatsiya: mozhet li byt’ odno bez drugogo v Rossii? [Oprichnina and Modernization: Might There Be One Without the Other in Russia?]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal “GosReg”: gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniy, 2016, no. 2, p. 2.
11. Ivannikov I.A. Oprichnina: prichiny, soderzhanie, posledstviya [Oprichnina: Causes, Content, Consequences]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’, 2017, vol. 9, no. 3/1, pp. 56–61.