Address: office 1410a, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
http://gum.narfu.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

The Structural Organization of English and Russian Folk Riddles. P. 124–132

Версия для печати

Section: Philology

UDC

82-193.1

Authors

Naylya I. Fayzullina
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University;
ul. Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan, 420008, Respublika Tatarstan, Russian Federation; e-mail: nelya7@mail.ru

Abstract

The peculiar structure of folk riddles still occupies the minds of linguists and folklorists due to the complex organization of this genre. The author of this article suggests a hypothesis about the threepart model of the riddle (introductory part, descriptive part, and the answer). The introductory and the descriptive parts are differentiated on the basis of their functions. This distinction is best demonstrated in riddles with a clear “guess” intention expressed by the formula What is it? The author believes that it was under the influence of such phrases that some riddles took the form of an interrogative sentence. Folklore formulas appearing at the beginning and at the end of the description also prove the significance of the introductory part. Such formulas can be found both in Russian and English riddles and present a clear statement of intention prior to description. The undertaken detailed analysis of folklore formulas revealed a cultural frame of riddle guessing: the answer should be given within a certain period of time; often, only a wise man can guess the answer; a wrong answer leads to corporal punishment, while the right answer can bring financial reward. The paper also considered riddles with an implicit introductory part. Having performed syntactic transformations and a semantic analysis of such sentences outside of their communicative situation, the author concludes that a declarative sentence is perceived as a riddle only under certain conditions of communication or if the situation has been predetermined.

Keywords

folklore, folk riddle, folklore formula, denotation, intention
Download (pdf, 4MB )

References

1. Petsch R. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Volksrätsels. Berlin, 1899. 168 p.
2. Abrahams R.D. Riddles. Dorson R.M. Folklore and Folklife: An Introduction. Chicago, 1972, pp. 129–143.
3. Toporov V.N. Iz nablyudeniy nad zagadkoy [From Studies on the Riddle]. Issledovaniya v oblasti balto-slavyanskoy dukhovnoy kul’tury. Zagadka kak tekst [Studies into Balto-Slavic Spiritual Culture]. Moscow, 1994. Vol. 1, pp. 10–117.
4. Levin Yu.I. Semanticheskaya struktura zagadki [The Semantic Structure of a Riddle]. Paremiologicheskiy sbornik. Poslovitsa. Zagadka (Struktura. Smysl. Tekst) [A Paremiological Collection. Proverb. Riddle (Structure. Meaning. Text)]. Moscow, 1978, pp. 283–314.
5. Senderovich S.Ya. Morfologiya zagadki [The Morphology of a Riddle]. Moscow, 2008. 208 p.
6. Simashko T.V. Modelirovanie kontseptual’noy struktury na osnove denotativno svyazannykh edinits [Conceptual Structure Modelling on the Basis of Denotatively Related Units]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2016, no. 6, pp. 128–137.
7. Chernousova I.P. Fol’klornye formuly: na peresechenii traditsii i teksta (na materiale bylin) [Folklore Formulae: On the Border of Tradition and Text (Case Study: Russian Epic Tales)]. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova, 2012, no. 2, pp. 106–110.
8. Mal’tsev G.I. Traditsionnye formuly russkoy narodnoy neobryadovoy liriki (Issledovanie po estetike ustnopoeticheskogo kanona) [Traditional Formulas of Russian Non-Ritual Folk Poetry (A Study on the Aesthetics of the Oral Poetic Сanon)]. Leningrad, 1989. 168 p.