CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

Relations Between the Republic of Armenia and the Armed Forces of South Russia in 1918 and Beginning of 1919. P. 27–34

Версия для печати

Section: History

UDC

94(470)

Authors

Mikhaylov Vadim Viktorovich
Faculty for Humanities, Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation (St. Petersburg, Russia)
e-mail: batukom@mail.ru

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the complex, controversial and contradictory political situation in South Caucasus in view of the declared independence of three key state entities of the region: the republics of Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. The author focuses on the diplomatic strategy of the young Republic of Armenia during the ongoing World War I, the Turkish intervention in the Caucasus and Russia’s losing its power over the Armenian territories due to the revolutionary events in the empire. The article examines the little-known aspects of the relationship between the Republic of Armenia and the leaders of the White Volunteer Army at the initial stage of the Civil War in Russia. The author revealed and analysed the causes and contradictions of these close relations against the background of the hard situation in Soviet Russia, anti-Russian policy of the British occupation administration in South Caucasus as well as mutual ethnic conflicts and territorial claims between Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan. The paper also considers the key milestones and areas of cooperation between the Armed Forces of South Russia and the political leaders of the Dashnak Republic of Armenia in terms of military and political collaboration and allied relations, which could change depending on the current political situation and the real correlation of forces. Revealing the goals and objectives of this cooperation, the author also described the diplomacy and military activities of all major political forces that had a say in the Armenian Question and participated in its resolution during the period under study. Based on the various archival materials (including the archives in Armenia), the article reveals the extent to which their actions affected the relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Armed Forces of South Russia.

Keywords

Civil War in Russia, White Movement, First Republic of Armenia, A.I. Denikin, Armed Forces of South Russia, Georgian-Armenian War 1918
Download (pdf, 2.7MB )

References

  1. Tokarzhevskiy E.A. Iz istorii inostrannoy interventsii i grazhdanskoy voyny v Azerbaydzhane [From the History of Foreign Intervention and Civil War in Azerbaijan]. Baku, 1957. 332 p.
  2. Kadishev A.B. Interventsiya i grazhdanskaya voyna v Zakavkaz’e [Intervention and Civil War in the Caucasus]. Moscow, 1960. 261 p.
  3. Petrosyan G.A. Otnosheniya Respubliki Armeniya s Rossiey (1918–1920 gg) [Relations Between the Republic of Armenia and Russia (1918–1920)]. Erevan, 2012. 424 p.
  4. Denikin A.I. Ocherki russkoy smuty. T. III. Beloe dvizhenie i bor’ba dobrovol’cheskoy armii. May–oktyabr’ 1918 goda [Essays on the Russian Turmoil. Vol. III. The White Movement and the Struggle of the Volunteer Army. May–October 1918]. Berlin, 1924. 278 p.
  5. Denikin A.I. Ocherki russkoy smuty. T. IV. Vooruzhennye sily Yuga Rossii [Essays on the Russian Turmoil. Vol. IV. Armed Forces of the Russian South]. Berlin, 1925. 248 p.
  6. Mikhaylov V.V. Vostochnyy vopros i pozitsii Velikobritanii i Rossii v Pervoy mirovoy voyne: dis. … d-ra ist. nauk [The Eastern Question and the Positions of the United Kingdom and Russia in World War I: Dr. Hist. Sci. Diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2009.
  7. Chachkhiani A. Bor’ba za territorial’nuyu tselostnost’ Gruzii v 1918–1919 godakh (Armyano-Gruzinskaya voyna): dis. … kand. ist. nauk [Fighting for the Territorial Integrity of Georgia in 1918–1919 (Georgian-Armenian War): Cand. Hist. Sci. Diss.]. Tbilisi, 2006.
  8. Hovannisian R. The Republic of Armenia. Los Angeles, 1982. Vol. I. 547 p.
  9. Mikhaylov V.V., Puchenkov A.S. Dobrovol’cheskaya armiya i Gruziya v 1918 g. [Volunteer Army and Georgia in 1918]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2012, no. 1, pp. 36–44.
  10. Voronov I. Kavkazskaya missiya Denikina [Denikin’s Mission in the Caucasus]. Krasnoyarskiy rabochiy, 16 August 2008.
  11. Puchenkov A.S. Natsional’naya politika generala Denikina (vesna 1918 – vesna 1920 g.) [The National Policy of General Denikin (Spring 1918 – Spring 1920)]. St. Petersburg, 2012. 338 p.
  12. El’chibekyan A. Belogvardeyshchina yuga Rossii i dashnaki [White Guardists in the South of Russia and the Dashnaks]. Izvestiya Akademii nauk Armyanskoy SSR. Ser.: Obshchestvennye nauki, 1950, no. 9, pp. 25–36.
  13. Iz istorii armyano-gruzinskikh vzaimootnosheniy. 1918 god: pogranichnyy konflikt, peregovory, voyna, soglashenie [From the History of Georgian-Armenian Relations. 1918: Border Conflict, Negotiations, War, Treaty]. Tiflis, 1919. 141 p.
  14. Mailyan B.V. K voprosu o territorial’nom konflikte na chernomorskom poberezh’e Kavkaza (iyul’ 1918 – may 1920 g.) [On the Territorial Conflict on the Caucasian Black Sea Coast (July 1918 – May 1920)]. Istoricheskoe prostranstvo. Problemy istorii stran SNG [Historical Space. Issues of the History of the CIS Countries]. Ed. by Chubar’yan A.O. Moscow, 2013, pp. 174–208.

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North