CC..png   

Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

“The Knowledgeable” of Kenozero: Magic Power and Sacred Knowledge. P. 25–34

Версия для печати

Section: History

UDC

394.9

Authors

Mazalova Nataliya Evgenyevna
Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography,
Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

In spite of the fact that Russian ritual experts (“the knowledgeable”) and their magic activity have long been an object of various studies, this research requires further development in the context of current trends both in Russian and world science. This paper studied folk ideas about “the knowledgeable”, their magic power and sacred knowledge in the local ethnocultural tradition of Kenozero using the field data obtained by the author in 1991. The following methods were used: the structural-semantic one, which helps to find the ethnographic substratum of mythological ideas, and the comparative method, allowing us to determine the place of Kenozero local tradition within the Russian one. The author studied traditional ideas of Kenozero population and compared them with beliefs prevailing on the rest of the Russian territory. Further in this paper ritual experts were differentiated. The author distinguishes between the concepts of magic power and secret knowledge. The magic power of a wizard is concentrated in his helpers. The “secret” knowledge is first of all the knowledge of spells and magical actions, but for wizards it also includes the ability to control his helpers. Spells, that all ritual experts know, also have magic power. Possessing magic power and sacred knowledge, “the knowledgeable” played an important social role: they held contact with the natural world. Kenozero tradition is unique due to the fact that in addition to demons wizards had woodland and water spirits as their helpers. The author believes that when differentiating ritual experts one should take into account the localization of his helper – whether it is the world of people or the natural world. Having studied traditional beliefs about “the knowledgeable” in Kenozero, the author was able to reveal specific mythological ideas typical of this local ethnocultural tradition and found it rather archaic.

Keywords

ritual expert, wizard, sorcerer, healer, magic power, sacred knowledge
Download (pdf, 2.4MB )

References

  1. Vinogradova L.N. Narodnaya demonologiya i mifo-ritual’naya traditsiya slavyan [Folk Demonology and Myth- Ritual Tradition of the Slavs]. Moscow, 2000.
  2. Dobrovol’skaya V.E. Narodnye predstavleniya o koldunakh v neskazochnoy proze [Traditional Ideas About Wizards in Non-Fairytale Prose]. Muzhskoy sbornik. Vyp. 1. Muzhchina v traditsionnoy kul’ture [Male Collection. Vol. 1. Man in Traditional Culture]. Moscow, 2001, рр. 95–105.
  3. Krinichnaya N.A. Russkaya narodnaya mifologicheskaya proza. Istochniki i polisemantizm obrazov. T. 2. Bylichki, byval’shchiny, legendy, pover’ya o lyudyakh, obladayushchikh magicheskimi sposobnostyami [Russian Folk Mythological Prose: Sources and Polysemantic Images. Vol. 1 Stories About Meeting Evil Spirits, True Stories, Legends, Beliefs About People with Magical Powers]. Petrozavodsk, 2000.
  4. Mazalova N.E. Etnograficheskie aspekty izucheniya lichnosti “znayushchego” [Ethnographic Aspects of Studying the Personality of “the Knowledgeable”]. St. Petersburg, 2011.
  5. Shchepanskaya T.B. Sila (kommunikativnye i reproduktivnye aspekty muzhskoy magii) [Powers (Communicative and Reproductive Aspects of Male Magic)]. Muzhskoy sbornik. Vyp. 1. Muzhchina v traditsionnoy kul’ture [Male Collection. Vol. 1. Man in Traditional Culture]. Moscow, 2001, рр. 71–94.
  6. Baranov D.A., Madlevskaya E.L. Obraz lyagushki v vyshivke i mifopoeticheskikh predstavleniyakh vostochnykh slavyan [The Image of a Frog in Embroidery and Myth-Poetic Beliefs of the East Slavs]. Zhenshchina i veshchestvennyy mir kul’tury u narodov Evropy i Rossii: sb. MAE [Woman and the Real Cultural World of the Peoples in Europe and Russia: Collected Papers of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography]. Vol. XLVII. Рр. 115–130.
  7. Bayburin A., Toporkov A. U istokov etiketa. Etnograficheskie ocherki [At the Root of Etiquette. Ethnographic Essays]. Leningrad, 1990.
  8. Vlasova M. Entsiklopediya russkikh sueveriy [Encyclopedia of Russian Superstitions]. St. Petersburg, 2008.
  9. Toporov V.N. Ob odnoy indoevropeyskoy zagovornoy traditsii (izbrannye glavy) [On One Indo-European Tradition of Spells (Selected Chapters)]. Issledovaniya v oblasti balto-slavyanskoy kul’tury: Zagovor [Research in the Balto-Slavic Culture: Spells]. Moscow, 1993.
  10. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya [Magic, Science, and Religion]. Moscow, 1998.
  11. Zelenin D.K. Vostochnoslavyanskaya etnografiya [East Slavic Ethnography]. Moscow, 1991.

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

Elibrary.ru

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
Лесной журнал 

Arctic and North