Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1410a, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 28-76-18
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
http://gum.narfu.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

Vocalization of Postvocalic Sonorants (Based on American and Russian Spontaneous Speech). P. 78–85

Версия для печати

Section: Philology

UDC

81’34

Authors

Svetlana V. Androsova
Amur State University korp. 7, 21 Ignat’evskoe shosse, Blagoveshchensk, 675027, Russian Federation; e-mail: androsova_s@mail.ru
Hai Teng
Amur State University korp. 7, 21 Ignat’evskoe shosse, Blagoveshchensk, 675027, Russian Federation; e-mail: tenghai123@mail.ru

Abstract

This paper focuses on universal and specific features of postvocalic /l/ vocalization in spontaneous American speech (AE), Russian as L1 (RR) and Russian as L2 speech produced by Chinese learners of Russian (RCh). Unlike in British English that has both light and dark varieties of /l/: [l], [lʲ], in AE only dark variety of /l/ is represented; in Russian there is a phonemic opposition of dark and light /l/ and /lʲ/. Acoustic cues of vocalized /l/ compared to its canonical variety include greater number of formants that go above 1000 Hz and increased intensity and duration. There are no data concerning /lʲ/ vocalization. The results of our acoustic study indicate that there are no grounds to consider vocalization a feature of Chinese accent while acquiring Russian and AE as L2, because both RR and RCh speakers demonstrated almost the same percentage of postvocalic /l/ vocalization that was similar to the data on AE, with the quality of the preceding vowel having no effect on the process in all speech samples analysed. However, specific features of vocalization were noted: 1) much larger percentage of /lʲ/ vocalization in RR compared to RCh; 2) longer duration and higher intensity of vocalized /l/ in RCh compared to RR; 3) word-internal i-like vowel insertion after postvocalic /lʲ/ in RCh that was not found in RR.

Keywords

vocalization, postvocalic /l/ glide, spontaneous speech, American English, Russian language, Chinese accent
Download (pdf, 4.5MB )

References

  1. Bondarko L.V., Verbitskaya L.A., Zinder L.R., Geyl’man I.I., Svetozarova N.D., Shtern A.S., Aleksandrov L.G., Bogdanova N.V., Varzhavitina E.A., Vol’skaya N.B., Guseva S.I., Zykova M.A., Kukol’shchikova L.E., Ovcharenko E.B., Oshchuyko E.I., Pavlova A.V., Shitova L.F. Fonetika spontannoy rechi [Phonetics of Spontaneous Speech]. Leningrad, 1988. 245 p. 
  2. Reformatskiy A.A. Iz istorii otechestvennoy fonologii. Ocherk. Khrestomatiya [From the History of Russian Phonology. Essay. Reader]. Moscow, 1970. 527 p. 
  3. Geyl’man N.I. Foneticheskie kharakteristiki spontannoy rechi (eksperimental’no-foneticheskoe issledovanie na materiale soglasnykh): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Phonetic Characteristics of Spontaneous Speech (Experimental Phonetic Studies on Consonants): Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abs.]. Leningrad, 1983. 15 p. 
  4. Krakow R.A. Nonsegmental Influences on Velum Movement Patterns: Syllables, Sentences, Stress and Speaking Rate. Phon. Phonol., 1993, vol. 5, pp. 87–116. 
  5. Gick B. Articulatory Correlates of Ambisyllabicity in English Glides and Liquids. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Constraints on Phonetic Interpretation. Cambridge, 2003, pp. 222–236. 
  6. Shakhbagova D.A. Foneticheskie osobennosti proiznositel’nykh variantov angliyskogo yazyka [Phonetic Peculiarities of Articulatory Variants of the English Language]. Moscow, 1982. 128 p. 
  7. Medvedeva T.V. O tipakh i prichinakh zvukovykh izmeneniy (britanskaya, amerikanskaya i russkaya lingvisticheskie traditsii) [Types and Causes of Sound Change (British, American and Russian Linguistic Tradition)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Ser.: Yazykoznanie i literaturovedenie, 2015, no. 1, pp. 146–152. 
  8. Gick B., Campbell F., Oh S., Tamburri-Watt L. Toward Universals in the Gestural Organization of Syllables: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Liquids. J. Phon., 2006, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 49–72. 
  9. Thomas E.R. An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Duke University Press, 2001. 230 p. 
  10. Shcherba L.V. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ [Language System and Speech Activity]. Leningrad, 1974. 428 p. 
  11. Parson G. From “RP” to “Estuary English”: The Concept ‘Received’ and the Debate About British Pronunciation Standards. Available at: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/parsons_ma.pdf (accessed 10 September 2016). 
  12. He Y. Production of English Syllable Final /l/ by Mandarin Chinese Speakers. J. Lang. Teach. Res., 2014, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 742–750. 
  13. Ding H., Jokish O., Hoffmann R. An Acoustic and Perceptive Analysis of Postvocalic /l/ in Mandarin Chinese Leaners of German. Proc. ICPhS XVII. Hong Kong, 17–21 August 2011. Available at: https://www.internationalpho neticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Ding,%20Hongwei/Ding,%20 Hongwei.pdf (accessed 10 September 2016). 
  14. Boersma P., Weenink D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.4.15). Available at: http://www.fon. hum.uva.nl/praat/ (accessed 10 September 2016).